No abstract

No abstract

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance ( p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion ( p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance to examine variation in effect magnitudes across sample and setting. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples and 15,305 total participants from 36 countries and territories. Using conventional statistical significance (p &lt; .05), fifteen (54%) of the replications provided evidence in the same direction and statistically significant as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p &lt; .0001), fourteen (50%) provide such evidence reflecting the extremely high powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications had effect sizes larger than the original finding and 21 (75%) had effect sizes smaller than the original finding. The median comparable Cohen’s d effect sizes for original findings was 0.60 and for replications was 0.15. Sixteen replications (57%) had small effect sizes (&lt; .20) and 9 (32%) were in the opposite direction from the original finding. Across settings, 11 (39%) showed significant heterogeneity using the Q statistic and most of those were among the findings eliciting the largest overall effect sizes; only one effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity. Only one effect showed a Tau &gt; 0.20 indicating moderate heterogeneity. Nine others had a Tau near or slightly above 0.10 indicating slight heterogeneity. In moderation tests, very little heterogeneity was attributable to task order, administration in lab versus online, and exploratory WEIRD versus less WEIRD culture comparisons. Cumulatively, variability in observed effect sizes was more attributable to the effect being studied than the sample or setting in which it was studied.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether immune responses interfered with gene therapy rescue using subretinally delivered recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype 2 carrying the RPE65 cDNA gene driven by the human RPE65 promoter (rAAV2.hRPE65p.hRPE65) in the second eye of RPE65À/À dogs that had previously been treated in a similar manner in the other eye. Bilateral subretinal injection was performed in nine dogs with the second eye treated 85-180 days after the first. Electroretinography (ERG) and vision testing showed rescue in 16 of 18 treated eyes, with no significant difference between first and second treated eyes. A serum neutralizing antibody (NAb) response to rAAV2 was detected in all treated animals, but this did not prevent or reduce the effectiveness of rescue in the second treated eye. We conclude that successful rescue using subretinal rAAV2.hRPE65p.hRPE65 gene therapy in the second eye is not precluded by prior gene therapy in the contralateral eye of the RPE65À/À dog. This finding has important implications for the treatment of human LCA type II patients. Gene Therapy (2011) The condition is characterized by severe visual impairment in dim light, typically progressing to complete blindness in the second decade of life. LCA type II results from mutations in the RPE65 gene, and accounts for 10-15% of LCA cases. 2,3 RPE65 encodes a protein that forms an essential component of the visual cycle and is expressed within the retinal pigment epithelium. 3 The visual cycle is responsible for the supply of the chromophore, 11-cis-retinal, to the photoreceptor cells for combination with the rod and cone opsins to form the visual pigments. RPE65 is an isomerohydrolase that converts esters of vitamin A to 11-cis-retinol for subsequent oxidation to 11-cis-retinal prior to transport to the photoreceptors. A spontaneous 4 basepair deletion in RPE65 in the Briard breed of dog results in a premature stop codon and an absence of RPE65 gene product, resulting in a very similar phenotype to LCA type II. 4 Affected dogs have markedly reduced vision and an abnormal electroretinogram with greatly elevated threshold of responses. 4,5 The similarities between the human and canine disease resulting from RPE65 mutations, make the RPE65À/À Briard a valuable large animal model for LCA type II.Dramatic restoration of vision with gene therapy was first reported in the canine RPE65À/À model of LCA. 6 A number of studies have shown rod and cone photoreceptor rescue using rAAV vectors to deliver a normal copy of the RPE65 gene via a subretinal injection in the RPE65 mutant Briard. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] On the basis of the great success of the canine trials, phase I/II clinical trials of rAAV-RPE65 gene replacement therapy in human LCA patients have started with the first reported results showing great promise. 14-16 Thus far in all human patients only one eye has been treated. A critical aspect of the management of LCA