No abstract

Objectives We hypothesized that human atrial fibrillation (AF) may be sustained by localized sources (electrical rotors and focal impulses), whose elimination (Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation, FIRM) may improve outcome from AF ablation. Background Catheter ablation for AF is a promising therapy, whose success is limited in part by uncertainty in the mechanisms that sustain AF. We developed a computational approach to map whether AF is sustained by several meandering waves (the prevailing hypothesis) or localized sources, then prospectively tested whether targeting patient-specific mechanisms revealed by mapping would improve AF ablation outcome. Methods We recruited 92 individuals during 107 consecutive ablation procedures for paroxysmal or persistent (72%) AF. Cases were prospectively treated, in a 2-arm 1:2 design, by ablation at sources (FIRM-Guided) followed by conventional ablation (n=36), or conventional ablation alone (n=71; FIRM-Blinded). Results Localized rotors or focal impulses were detected in 98 (97%) of 101 cases with sustained AF, each exhibiting 2.1±1.0 sources. The acute endpoint (AF termination or consistent slowing) was achieved in 86% of FIRM-guided versus 20% of FIRM-Blinded cases (p<0.001). FIRM ablation alone at the primary source terminated AF in 2.5 minutes (median; IQR 1.0–3.1). Total ablation time did not differ between groups (57.8±22.8 versus 52.1±17.8 minutes, p=0.16). During 273 days (median; IQR 132–681 days) after a single procedure, FIRM-Guided cases had higher freedom from AF (82.4% versus 44.9%; p<0.001) after a single procedure than FIRM-blinded cases with rigorous, often implanted, ECG monitoring. Adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Localized electrical rotors and focal impulse sources are prevalent sustaining-mechanisms for human AF. FIRM ablation at patient-specific sources acutely terminated or slowed AF, and improved outcome. These results offer a novel mechanistic framework and treatment paradigm for AF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01008722)

Background The substrates for human atrial fibrillation (AF) are poorly understood but involve abnormal repolarization (action potential duration, APD). We hypothesized that beat-to-beat oscillations in APD may explain AF substrates and why vulnerability to AF forms a spectrum from control subjects without AF to patients with paroxysmal then persistent AF. Methods and Results In 33 subjects (12 persistent AF, 13 paroxysmal AF, 8 controls without AF), we recorded left (n=33) and right (n=6) atrial APD on pacing from cycle lengths (CL) 600–500 ms (100–120 beats/min) to AF. APD alternans required progressively faster rates for patients with persistent AF, paroxysmal AF and controls (CL 411±94 vs 372±72 vs 218±33 ms; p<0.01). In AF patients, APD alternans occurred at rates as slow as 100–120 beats/min, unrelated to APD restitution (p=NS). In this milieu, spontaneous ectopy initiated AF. At fast rates, APD alternans disorganized to complex oscillations en route to AF. Complex oscillations also arose at progressively faster rates for persistent AF, paroxysmal AF and controls (CL: 316±99 vs 266±19 vs 177±16 ms; p=0.02). In paroxysmal AF, APD oscillations amplified prior to AF (p<0.001). In controls, APD alternans arose only at very fast rates (CL < 250 ms; p<0.001 vs AF groups) just prior to AF. In n=4 AF patients in whom rapid pacing did not initiate AF, APD alternans arose transiently then extinguished. Conclusions Atrial APD alternans reveals dynamic substrates for AF, arising most readily (at lower rates and higher magnitudes) in persistent AF then paroxysmal AF, and least readily in controls. APD alternans preceded all AF episodes, and was absent when AF did not initiate. The cellular mechanisms for APD alternans near resting heart rates require definition.

Objectives To determine if ablation that targets patient-specific AF-sustaining substrates (rotors or focal sources) is more durable than trigger ablation alone at preventing late AF recurrences. Background Late recurrence substantially limits the efficacy of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for AF, and is associated with PV reconnection and the emergence of new triggers. Methods We performed 3 year follow-up of the CONFIRM trial, in which 92 consecutive AF patients (70.7% persistent) underwent novel computational mapping to reveal a median of 2 (IQR 1–2) rotors or focal sources in 97.7% of patients during AF. Ablation comprised source (Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation, FIRM) then conventional ablation in n=27 (FIRM-guided), and conventional ablation alone in n=65 (FIRM-blinded). Patients were followed with implanted ECG monitors when possible (85.2% FIRM guided, 23.1% FIRM-blinded). Results On 890 days follow-up (median; IQR 224–1563) compared FIRM-blinded therapy, patients receiving FIRM-guided ablation maintained higher freedom from AF after 1.2±0.4 procedures (median 1, IQR 1–1) (77.8% vs 38.5%; p=0.001) and a single procedure (p>0.001), and higher freedom from all atrial arrhythmias (p=0.003). Freedom from AF was higher when ablation directly or coincidentally passed through sources than when it missed sources (p>0.001). CONCLUSIONS FIRM-guided ablation is more durable than conventional trigger-based ablation at preventing 3 year AF recurrence. Future studies should investigate how ablation of patient-specific AF-sustaining rotors and focal sources alters the natural history of arrhythmia recurrence.

No abstract

No abstract

IDC is common in elderly persons, especially in the annulus fibrosus and lower thoracic spine. The prevalence of IDC increases with age and extent of disk space loss.

Objective We hypothesized that ablation of recently described stable AF sources, either directly by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) or coincidentally when anatomical ablation passes through AF sources, may explain long term freedom of AF. Background It is unclear why conventional anatomical AF ablation can be very effective in some patients yet ineffective in others with similar profiles. Methods The CONFIRM trial prospectively revealed stable AF rotors or focal sources in 98/101 subjects with AF at 107 consecutive ablation cases. In 1:2 fashion, subjects received targeted source ablation (FIRM) then conventional ablation, or conventional ablation alone. We determined if ablation lesions on electroanatomic maps passed through AF sources on FIRM maps. Results Subjects who completed followup (n=94, 71.2% persistent AF) each showed 2.3±1.1 concurrent AF rotors or focal sources, that lay near pulmonary veins (22.8%), left atrial roof (16.0%), and elsewhere in left (28.2%) and right (33.0%) atria. AF sources were ablated directly in 100% FIRM cases and coincidentally (e.g. left atrial roof) in 45% conventional cases (p<0.05). During 273 days (median, IQR 138–636) after 1 procedure, AF was absent in 80.3% of patients if sources were ablated but recurred in 81.8% of patients if sources were missed (p<0.001). Freedom from AF was highest if all sources were ablated, intermediate if some sources were ablated, and lowest if no sources were ablated (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Elimination of stable AF rotors and focal sources may explain freedom from AF after diverse approaches to ablation. Patient-specific AF source distributions are consistent with the reported success of specific anatomical lesion sets, and of widespread ablation. These results support targeting AF sources to reduce unnecessary ablation, and motivate studies on FIRM-only ablation.