In categorical semantics, there have traditionally been two approaches to modelling environments, one by use of finite products in cartesian closed categories, the other by use of the base categories of indexed categories with structure. Each requires modifications in order to account for environments in call-by-value programming languages. There have been two more general definitions along both of these lines: the first generalising from cartesian to symmetric premonoidal categories, the second generalising from indexed categories with specified structure to κ-categories. In this paper, we investigate environments in call-by-value languages by analysing a fine-grain variant of Moggi's computational λcalculus, giving two equivalent sound and complete classes of models: one given by closed Freyd categories, which are based on symmetric premonoidal categories, the other given by closed κ-categories.

We present techniques that enable higher-order functional computations to "explain" their work by answering questions about how parts of their output were calculated. As explanations, we consider the traditional notion of program slices, which we show can be inadequate, and propose a new notion: trace slices. We present techniques for specifying flexible and rich slicing criteria based on partial expressions, parts of which have been replaced by holes. We characterise program slices in an algorithm-independent fashion and show that a least slice for a given criterion exists. We then present an algorithm, called unevaluation, for computing least program slices from computations reified as traces. Observing a limitation of program slices, we develop a notion of trace slice as another form of explanation and present an algorithm for computing them. The unevaluation algorithm can be applied to any subtrace of a trace slice to compute a program slice whose evaluation generates that subtrace. This close correspondence between programs, traces, and their slices can enable the programmer to understand a computation interactively, in terms of the programming language in which the computation is expressed. We present an implementation in the form of a tool, discuss some important practical implementation concerns and present some techniques for addressing them.

Abstract-We study Abramsky's applicative bisimilarity abstractly, in the context of call-by-value λ-calculi with algebraic effects. We first of all endow a computational λ-calculus with a monadic operational semantics. We then show how the theory of relators provides precisely what is needed to generalise applicative bisimilarity to such a calculus, and to single out those monads and relators for which applicative bisimilarity is a congruence, thus a sound methodology for program equivalence. This is done by studying Howe's method in the abstract.

We consider the natural combinations of algebraic computational effects such as side-effects, exceptions, interactive input/output, and nondeterminism with continuations. Continuations are not an algebraic effect, but previously developed combinations of algebraic effects given by sum and tensor extend, with effort, to include commonly used combinations of the various algebraic effects with continuations. Continuations also give rise to a third sort of combination, that given by applying the continuations monad transformer to an algebraic effect. We investigate the extent to which sum and tensor extend from algebraic effects to arbitrary monads, and the extent to which Felleisen et al.'s C operator extends from continuations to its combination with algebraic effects. To do all this, we use Dubuc's characterisation of strong monads in terms of enriched large Lawvere theories.

We present the call-by-push-value (CBPV) calculus, which decomposes the typed call-by-value (CBV) and typed call-by-name (CBN) paradigms into fine-grain primitives. On the operational side, we give big-step semantics and a stack machine for CBPV, which leads to a straightforward push/pop reading of CBPV programs. On the denotational side, we model CBPV using cpos and, more generally, using algebras for a strong monad. For storage, we present an O'Hearn-style "behaviour semantics" that does not use a monad.We present the translations from CBN and CBV to CBPV. All these translations straightforwardly preserve denotational semantics. We also study their operational properties: simulation and full abstraction.We give an equational theory for CBPV, and show it equivalent to a categorical semantics using monads and algebras. We use this theory to formally compare CBPV to Filinski's variant of the monadic metalanguage, as well as to Marz's language SFPL, both of which have essentially the same type structure as CBPV. We also discuss less formally the differences between the CBPV and monadic frameworks.

Scope of the SeriesWith the idea of partial information and approximation as the starting point, this bookseries focuses on the interplay among computer science, logic, and mathematics through algebraic, order-theoretic, topological, and categorical means , with the goal of promoting cross-fertilization of ideas and advancing interdisciplinary research .This bookseries provides a distinctive publication forum for collected works and monographs on topics such as domain theory, programming semantics, types , concurrency, lambda calculi, topology and logic in computer science, and especially applications in non-traditional and emerging areas in which the development of formal semantics deepens our understanding of a computational phenomenon.

The literature on concurrency theory offers a wealth of examples of characteristic-formula constructions for various behavioural relations over finite labelled transition systems and Kripke structures that are defined in terms of fixed points of suitable functions. Such constructions and their proofs of correctness have been developed independently, but have a common underlying structure. This study provides a general view of characteristic formulae that are expressed in terms of logics with a facility for the recursive definition of formulae. It is shown how several examples of characteristic-formula constructions from the literature can be recovered as instances of the proposed general framework, and how the framework can be used to yield novel constructions. The paper also offers general results pertaining to the definition of co-characteristic formulae and of characteristic formulae expressed in terms of infinitary modal logics.

Abstract. Normal form bisimulation is a powerful theory of program equivalence, originally developed to characterize Lévy-Longo tree equivalence and Boehm tree equivalence. It has been adapted to a range of untyped, higher-order calculi, but types have presented a difficulty. In this paper, we present an account of normal form bisimulation for types, including recursive types. We develop our theory for a continuation-passing style calculus, Jump-With-Argument (JWA), where normal form bisimilarity takes a very simple form. We give a novel congruence proof, based on insights from game semantics. A notable feature is the seamless treatment of eta-expansion. We demonstrate the normal form bisimulation proof principle by using it to establish a syntactic minimal invariance result and the uniqueness of the fixed point operator at each type.