BackgroundWeaning failure is a crucial hindrance in critically ill patients. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), a well-known weaning index, has some limitations in predicting weaning outcomes. A new weaning index using point-of-care ultrasound with diaphragmic thickening fraction (DTF) has potential benefits for improving weaning success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of DTF and RSBI for predicting successful weaning compared to RSBI alone.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients from the medical intensive care unit or ward who were using mechanical ventilation and readied for weaning. Patients underwent a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) for 1 h, and then, both hemi-diaphragms were visualized in the zone of apposition using a 10-MHz linear probe. Diaphragm thickness was recorded at the end of inspiration and expiration which supposed the lung volume equal to total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV), respectively, and the DTF was calculated as a percentage from this formula: thickness at TLC minus thickness at RV divided by thickness at RV. In addition, RSBI was calculated at 1 min after SBT. Weaning failure was defined as the inability to maintain spontaneous breathing within 48 h.ResultsOf the 34 patients enrolled, the mean (± SD) age was 66.5 (± 13.5) years. There were 25 patients with weaning success, 9 patients in the weaning failure group. The receiver operating characteristic curves of right and left DTF and the RSBI for the prediction of successful weaning were 0.951, 0.700, and 0.709, respectively. The most accurate cutoff value for prediction of successful weaning was right DTF ≥ 26% (sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 68%, positive predictive value of 89%, negative predictive value of 86%). The combination of right DTF ≥ 26% and RSBI ≤ 105 increased specificity to 78% but slightly decreased sensitivity to 92%. Intra-observer correlation increased sharply to almost 0.9 in the first ten patients and slightly increased after that.ConclusionsPoint-of-care ultrasound to assess diaphragm function has an excellent learning curve and helps physicians determine weaning readiness in critically ill patients. The combination of right DTF and RSBI greatly improved the accuracy for prediction of successful weaning compared to RSBI alone.Trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20171025001. Retrospectively registered on October 23, 2017.

No abstract

Background:Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is usually underrecognized due to nonspecific presentations. Undiagnosed CTEPH leads to unnecessary investigations for other diseases, and more importantly, increased morbidities and mortality.Objectives:The aim of this study was to define overall CTEPH incidence and the rate of CTEPH after acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in a tertiary care university hospital and to record risk factors, clinical and imaging characteristics, diagnosis assessment, and management methods.Materials and Methods:The retrospective 5-year data, between 2012 and 2016, was extracted. Out of 1751 patients, we screened, 286 had, at least, evidence of pulmonary embolism. CTEPH was diagnosed in 20 patients, and 12 in this group had characteristics of combined APE or history of APE.Results:The overall incidence of CTEPH was 37.8 cases per million patients, and the incidence of CTEPH after APE was 5.1%. The most common presentation was progressive exertional dyspnea (50%). All patients were diagnosed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography combined with echocardiogram. Surprisingly, only two patients had investigations with ventilation/perfusion lung scan. None underwent the preferred curative surgical treatment of pulmonary endarterectomy and two had balloon pulmonary angioplasty. All patients received anticoagulants, while only 5 patients were treated with pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific drugs.Conclusion:CTEPH was uncommon in our institute, with an underuse of the standard test. Suboptimal diagnosis assessment and management remain critical problems. Developing a properly trained CTEPH care team would improve patient outcomes, but cost/resources may be prohibitive for such a relatively rare disease.Trial Registration:TCTR20180220008 registered February 19, 2018.

No abstract