◥Purpose: Pembrolizumab improved survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aims of this study were to determine if pembrolizumab would be safe, result in pathologic tumor response (pTR), and lower the relapse rate in patients with resectable human papillomavirus (HPV)-unrelated HNSCC.Patients and Methods: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered and followed 2 to 3 weeks later by surgical tumor ablation. Postoperative (chemo)radiation was planned. Patients with high-risk pathology (positive margins and/or extranodal extension) received adjuvant pembrolizumab. pTR was quantified as the proportion of the resection bed with tumor necrosis, keratinous debris, and giant cells/histiocytes: pTR-0 (<10%), pTR-1 (10%-49%), and pTR-2 (≥50%). Coprimary endpoints were pTR-2 among all patients and 1-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk pathology (historical: 35%). Correlations of baseline PD-L1 and T-cell infiltration with pTR were assessed. Tumor clonal dynamics were evaluated (Clin-icalTrials.gov NCT02296684).Results: Thirty-six patients enrolled. After neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, serious (grades 3-4) adverse events and unexpected surgical delays/complications did not occur. pTR-2 occurred in eight patients (22%), and pTR-1 in eight other patients (22%). One-year relapse rate among 18 patients with high-risk pathology was 16.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-41.4%). pTR ≥10% correlated with baseline tumor PD-L1, immune infiltrate, and IFNg activity. Matched samples showed upregulation of inhibitory checkpoints in patients with pTR-0 and confirmed clonal loss in some patients.Conclusions: Among patients with locally advanced, HPVunrelated HNSCC, pembrolizumab was safe, and any pathologic response was observed in 44% of patients with 0% pathologic complete responses. The 1-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk pathology was lower than historical.
Objective To comprehensively examine the prognostic significance of extranodal extension (ENE) in human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV‐positive OPSCC). Methods Retrospective cohort of cases diagnosed with HPV‐positive OPSCC from 2010 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database. Inclusion of all OPSCC HPV‐positive cases with appropriate International Classification of Diseases‐0‐3 codes that received surgery with a neck dissection. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. Hazard ratios (HR) for the independent effects of ENE and N stage on overall survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Cases that were ENE‐negative had the highest 5‐year survival (92.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.5%–94.7%). ENE‐positive cases had the lowest 5‐year survival (84.0%; 95% CI: 80.7%−87.4%). After adjusting for confounding variables, ENE‐positivity was associated with almost twice the hazard of death (HR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.35–2.67) compared to ENE‐negative cases. Nodal (N) category 1, ENE‐positive status was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.26–2.80) compared with N1, ENE‐negative status. Compared to N1/ENE‐negative cases, N2/ENE‐positive cases had the poorest survival (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.94–4.43). Both microscopic and macroscopic ENE were associated with worse outcomes compared to node‐positive/ENE‐negative status. Conclusion The implementation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system provides a much‐improved framework to develop and discuss treatment plans for HPV‐positive OPSCC. We feel that careful consideration should be given to the importance of ENE in patients with HPV‐positive OPSCC. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:939–945, 2020
IMPORTANCE Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. There is conflicting evidence regarding the indications for and benefits of adjuvant radiation therapy for advanced CSCC tumors of the head and neck. OBJECTIVE To assess indications for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with CSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of 349 patients with head and neck CSCC treated with primary resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy at 2 tertiary referral centers from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data were compared between treatment groups with a χ 2 analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression. RESULTS A total of 349 patients had tumors that met the inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 70 [12] years; age range, 32-94 years; 302 [86.5%] male), and 191 (54.7%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were 59.4% for DFS and 47.4% for OS. Patients with larger, regionally metastatic, poorly differentiated tumors with perineural invasion (PNI) and younger immunosuppressed patients were more likely to receive adjuvant radiation therapy. On Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression, patients with periorbital tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.48; 95% CI, 1.00-6.16), PNI (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.12-3.19), or N2 or greater nodal disease (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.13-4.16) had lower DFS. Immunosuppressed patients (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.12-4.17) and those with N2 or greater nodal disease (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.42-4.17) had lower OS. Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved OS for the entire cohort (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.90). In a subset analysis of tumors with PNI, adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.93) and OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86). Adjuvant radiation therapy was also associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84) and OS (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.61) in patients with regional disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with advanced CSCC, receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved survival in those with PNI and regional disease.
Academic centers rely primarily on q1h flap checks by intensive care unit nurses using physical examination and Doppler sonography. Reduced resident monitoring frequency did not alter flap salvage nor flap outcome. These findings suggest that institutions may successfully monitor free flaps with decreased resident burden.
We want to thank Martin Kauke, MD, for his invaluable contribution to this project. There was no financial compensation for this contribution.
PURPOSE The volume treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is a mediator of toxicity, and reduced volumes result in improved quality of life (QOL). In this phase II trial, treatment volumes were reduced by omitting PORT to the pathologically negative (PN0) neck in patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical resection and neck dissection with a PN0 neck and high-risk features mandating PORT to the primary and/or involved neck were eligible. The primary end point was greater than 90% disease control in the unirradiated neck. QOL was evaluated using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the University of Michigan patient-reported xerostomia questionnaire. RESULTS Seventy-three patients were enrolled, and 72 were evaluable. Median age was 56 years (range, 31 to 81 years); 58 patients were male, and 47 (65%) had a smoking history. Sites included oral cavity (n = 14), oropharynx (n = 37), hypopharynx (n = 4), larynx (n = 16), and unknown primary tumor (n = 1). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition), 67 patients (93%) had stage III/IV disease, and 71% of tumors involved or crossed midline. No patient had contralateral neck PORT. In 17 patients (24%), only the primary site was treated. At a median follow-up of 53 months, two patients experienced treatment failure of the PN0 unirradiated neck; they also experienced treatment failure locally. Unirradiated neck control was 97% (95% CI, 93.4% to 100.0%). Five-year rates of local control, regional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 84%, 93%, 60%, and 64%, respectively. QOL measures were not significantly different from baseline at 12 and 24 months post-PORT ( P > .05). CONCLUSION Eliminating PORT to the PN0 neck resulted in excellent control rates in the unirradiated neck without long-term adverse effects on global QOL.
6012 Background: Pembrolizumab has efficacy in metastatic HNSCC. We hypothesized that treatment intensification in surgically resectable HPV-negative, Stage III/IV HNSCC with neoadjuvant plus post-operative adjuvant (POA) pembrolizumab would be safe and reduce 1-year locoregional recurrence/distant metastases (LRR/DM) from 35% (historical: Cooper and Bernier NEJM 2004) to 15%. Methods: Phase II trial where all eligible patients received 1 dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg) prior to surgery and only those with high-risk pathologic features (HRPF: extracapsular extension/positive margin) were given POA cisplatin and radiation followed by pembrolizumab. PD-L1 staining was assessed by immunohistochemistry (9A11 antibody). Results: The study continues to enroll. Characteristics of 21 enrolled patients (pts) were median age 59 (32-87) yrs, tobacco use 81% (17 pts), clinical T2 (n = 2), T3 (n = 1), T4 (n = 18), and cN0/1 (n = 8), cN2 (n = 13). Preliminary analyses revealed five important findings: 1) No serious study drug-related AEs or unexpected surgical delays/complications, 2) No LRR/DM events in the first 10 patients with > 1-year follow-up after surgery 3) HRPF rate of 38% (95% CI: 18%-62%) (expected: 80%), 4) 43% of pts (95% CI: 22%-66%) with pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (definition: tumor necrosis and/or giant cell/histiocytic reaction to keratinous debris in > 10% of tumor area), and 5) 48% of pts (95% CI:26%-70%) with clinical-to-pathologic downstaging. Pathologic treatment effect (TE) in ≥ 70% of the resected tumor or lymph node tissue area occurred in 6/21 pts (29%). Baseline tumor biopsies were PD-L1 positive ( > 1% of tumor cells) in 11/19 (58%) evaluable samples and in 7/8 (88%) evaluable pathologic responders. A significant correlation existed between baseline PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and pathologic treatment effect in the tumor (correlation coefficient: 0.72 and p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab was safe and well tolerated. We observed several lines of evidence supporting an anti-tumor effect in these pts with a single dose of pre-operative pembrolizumab. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02296684.
Objectives The primary objective was to determine the rate of occult cervical nodal metastasis in patients undergoing elective neck dissection (END) during salvage laryngectomy. The secondary objective was to compare survival and postoperative complication rates between patients undergoing END versus observation. Methods A medical librarian performed a comprehensive search for END outcomes in laryngeal cancer patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy after primary chemoradiation therapy. Seventeen retrospective studies and 1 prospective study met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1,141 patients (799 END, 350 observed). Results The rate of nodal positivity was 11% among patients who underwent END during their salvage laryngectomy. Three studies and 155 patients were included in a 5‐year overall survival (OS) analysis with no significant difference in OS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82‐2.22). After inclusion of six studies and 494 patients (249 END, 245 observed), the risk of fistula formation was not statistically different (95% CI: 0.61‐2.56). Due to significant heterogeneity between studies and inadequate data, most patients could not be included in the meta‐analysis of outcomes. Conclusion Salvage laryngectomy patients undergoing END have an occult nodal positivity rate of 11%. Meta‐analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5‐year OS between patients undergoing END versus observation. Laryngoscope, 130:899–906, 2020
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.