Here, we highlight the potential translational benefits of delivering FLASH radiotherapy using ultra-high dose rates (>100 Gy·s −1 ). Compared with conventional dose-rate (CONV; 0.07-0.1 Gy·s −1 ) modalities, we showed that FLASH did not cause radiation-induced deficits in learning and memory in mice. Moreover, 6 months after exposure, CONV caused permanent alterations in neurocognitive end points, whereas FLASH did not induce behaviors characteristic of anxiety and depression and did not impair extinction memory. Mechanistic investigations showed that increasing the oxygen tension in the brain through carbogen breathing reversed the neuroprotective effects of FLASH, while radiochemical studies confirmed that FLASH produced lower levels of the toxic reactive oxygen species hydrogen peroxide. In addition, FLASH did not induce neuroinflammation, a process described as oxidative stress-dependent, and was also associated with a marked preservation of neuronal morphology and dendritic spine density. The remarkable normal tissue sparing afforded by FLASH may someday provide heretofore unrealized opportunities for dose escalation to the tumor bed, capabilities that promise to hasten the translation of this groundbreaking irradiation modality into clinical practice.ultra-high dose-rate irradiation | cognitive dysfunction | neuronal morphology | neuroinflammation | reactive oxygen species R adiation therapy (RT) remains an essential part of cancer treatment, and, today, the benefit of RT would increase dramatically if normal tissues surrounding the tumor could tolerate higher doses of radiation (1-3). In the last decade, major advances in high-precision treatment delivery and multimodal imaging have improved tolerance to RT (4), but the selective protection of normal tissue remains a significant clinical challenge and the radiation-induced toxicities still adversely impact the patient's quality of life. This latter fact largely remains an unmet medical need, and points to the urgency of developing improved RT modalities for combating those cancers refractory to treatment.This issue is especially critical for those afflicted with brain tumors, including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), for which standard treatment consists of surgical resection followed by RT and concomitant chemotherapy (temozolomide). Typical radiotherapeutic protocols for GBM induce neurocognitive complications, including impairments in learning and memory, attention, and executive function and a variety of mood disorders (5-8). A breadth of past work from our laboratories has linked adverse neurocognitive outcomes following cranial irradiation to a range of neuropathologies, including reductions in dendritic complexity and spine density (9-12), reductions in microvascular density (13-15), reduced myelination and synapse density, and increased neuroinflammation (16,17). These changes are persistent and problematic in the conventionally irradiated brain and have prompted efforts to more fully develop a truly innovative approach to RT, where we have concept...

No abstract

No abstract

With the capability to significantly preserve the normal brain from radiation-induced toxicities without compromising the efficacy of tumor treatments, irradiation at ultra-high dose rate referred as FLASH-RT provides a genuine therapeutic gain. Here we focus on the current shift towards hypofractionation in clinical practice and demonstrate that such an approach significantly maximizes the benefits of FLASH-RT in an orthotopic mouse model of GBM. While the clinical implementation of FLASH-RT will require modifications to standard practice such as development of FLASH-capable accelerators as well as the adaptation of treatment regimens, there are many potential benefits including: 1) an improved management of radiation resistant tumors for which dose escalation is necessary; 2) an enhanced quality of life of cancer survivors by preventing debilitating side effects; 3) minimized complications associated with organ motion and 4) an alleviated workload and reduced cost of cancer treatments.

No abstract

The clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT) requires challenges related to dosimetry and beam monitoring of ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) beams to be addressed. Detectors currently in use suffer from saturation effects under UHDR regimes, requiring the introduction of correction factors. There is significant interest from the scientific community to identify the most reliable solutions and suitable experimental approaches for UHDR dosimetry. This interest is manifested through the increasing number of national and international projects recently proposed concerning UHDR dosimetry. Attaining the desired solutions and approaches requires further optimization of already established technologies as well as the investigation of novel radiation detection and dosimetry methods. New knowledge will also emerge to fill the gap in terms of validated protocols, assessing new dosimetric procedures and standardized methods. In this paper, we discuss the main challenges coming from the peculiar beam parameters characterizing UHDR beams for FLASH RT. These challenges vary considerably depending on the accelerator type and technique used to produce the relevant UHDR radiation environment. We also introduce some general considerations on how the different time structure in the production of the radiation beams, as well as the dose and dose‐rate per pulse, can affect the detector response. Finally, we discuss the requirements that must characterize any proposed dosimeters for use in UDHR radiation environments. A detailed status of the current technology is provided, with the aim of discussing the detector features and their performance characteristics and/or limitations in UHDR regimes. We report on further developments for established detectors and novel approaches currently under investigation with a view to predict future directions in terms of dosimetry approaches, practical procedures, and protocols. Due to several on‐going detector and dosimetry developments associated with UHDR radiation environment for FLASH RT it is not possible to provide a simple list of recommendations for the most suitable detectors for FLASH RT dosimetry. However, this article does provide the reader with a detailed description of the most up‐to‐date dosimetric approaches, and describes the behavior of the detectors operated under UHDR irradiation conditions and offers expert discussion on the current challenges which we believe are important and still need to be addressed in the clinical translation of FLASH RT.

Major advances in high precision treatment delivery and imaging have greatly improved the tolerance of radiotherapy (RT); however, the selective sparing of normal tissue and the reduction of neurocognitive side effects from radiation-induced toxicities remain significant problems for pediatric patients with brain tumors. While the overall survival of pediatric patients afflicted with medulloblastoma (MB), the most common type primary brain cancer in children, remains high (≥80%), lifelong neurotoxic side-effects are commonplace and adversely impact patients’ quality of life. To circumvent these clinical complications, we have investigated the capability of ultra-high dose rate FLASH-radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to protect the radiosensitive juvenile mouse brain from normal tissue toxicities. Compared to conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiation, FLASH-RT was found to ameliorate radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction in multiple independent behavioral paradigms, preserve developing and mature neurons, minimize microgliosis and limit the reduction of the plasmatic level of growth hormone. The protective “FLASH effect” was pronounced, especially since a similar whole brain dose of 8 Gy delivered with CONV-RT caused marked reductions in multiple indices of behavioral performance (objects in updated location, novel object recognition, fear extinction, light-dark box, social interaction), reductions in the number of immature (doublecortin+) and mature (NeuN+) neurons and increased neuroinflammation, adverse effects that were not found with FLASH-RT. Our data point to a potentially innovative treatment modality that is able to spare, if not prevent, many of the side effects associated with long-term treatment that disrupt the long-term cognitive and emotional well-being of medulloblastoma survivors.

Purpose To present the acceptance and the commissioning, to define the reference dose, and to prepare the reference data for a quality assessment (QA) program of an ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) electron device in order to validate it for preclinical animal FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH RT) experiments and for FLASH RT clinical human protocols. Methods The Mobetron® device was evaluated with electron beams of 9 MeV in conventional (CONV) mode and of 6 and 9 MeV in UHDR mode (nominal energy). The acceptance was performed according to the acceptance protocol of the company. The commissioning consisted of determining the short‐ and long‐term stability of the device, the measurement of percent depth dose curves (PDDs) and profiles at two different positions (with two different dose per pulse regimen) and for different collimator sizes, and the evaluation of the variability of these parameters when changing the pulse width and pulse repetition frequency. Measurements were performed using a redundant and validated dosimetric strategy with alanine and radiochromic films, as well as Advanced Markus ionization chamber for some measurements. Results The acceptance tests were all within the tolerances of the company's acceptance protocol. The linearity with pulse width was within 1.5% in all cases. The pulse repetition frequency did not affect the delivered dose more than 2% in all cases but 90 Hz, for which the larger difference was 3.8%. The reference dosimetry showed a good agreement within the alanine and films with variations of 2.2% or less. The short‐term (resp. long‐term) stability was less than 1.0% (resp. 1.8%) and was the same in both CONV and UHDR modes. PDDs, profiles, and reference dosimetry were measured at two positions, providing data for two specific dose rates (about 9 Gy/pulse and 3 Gy/pulse). Maximal beam size was 4 and 6 cm at 90% isodose in the two positions tested. There was no difference between CONV and UHDR mode in the beam characteristics tested. Conclusions The device is commissioned for FLASH RT preclinical biological experiments as well as FLASH RT clinical human protocols.