No abstract

A filter-based single-wavelength photometer (Particle Soot Absorption Photometer, PSAP) for measuring light absorption by aerosols was modified to measure at three wavelengths, 467 nm, 530 nm, and 660 nm. The modified and an unmodified photometer were calibrated during the Reno Aerosol Optics Study (RAOS) 2002 against two absorption standards: a photoacoustic instrument and the difference between the extinction and scattering coefficient. This filter-based absorption method has to be corrected for scattering aerosol and transmission changes. A simple function for this was derived from the calibration experiment as a function of transmission and single-scattering albedo. For an unmodified PSAP at typical atmospheric absorption coefficients the algorithm yields about 5-7% lower absorption coefficients than does the usually used method. The three-wavelength PSAP was used for atmospheric measurements both during RAOS and during the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS).

Abstract. Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filterbased instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The intercomparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate.

[1] Values for Mie-equivalent aerosol asymmetry parameter (g) were derived using a variety of methods from the large suite of measurements (in situ and remote from surface and aircraft) made in Oklahoma during the 2003 aerosol Intensive Operations Period (IOP). Median values derived for dry asymmetry parameter at 550 nm ranged between 0.55 and 0.63 over all instruments and for all derivation methods, with the exception of one instrument which did not measure over the full size range of optically important aerosol. Median values for the ''wet'' asymmetry parameter (i.e., asymmetry parameter at humidity conditions closer to ambient) were between 0.59 and 0.72. Values for g derived for surface and airborne in situ measurements were highly correlated, but in situ and remote sensing measurements both at the surface and aloft did not agree as well because of vertical inhomogeneity of the aerosol. Radiative forcing calculations suggest that a 10% decrease in g would result in a 19% reduction in top of atmosphere radiative forcing for the conditions observed during the IOP. Comparison of the different methods for deriving g suggests that in computing the asymmetry parameter, aerosol size is the most important parameter to measure; composition is less important except for how it influences the hygroscopic growth (i.e., size) of particles.

•1-2% yr -• presumably due to increased agricultural burning. Numerous field fires during the second half of 1999 influenced the surface aerosol at the CART site causing substantial variability of aerosol optical properties. The aerosol hygroscopic growth factor (f(RH)), corresponding to a relative humidity increase of 40-85%, showed a median value of 1.83 for 1999, although much lower values were observed during periods that were probably influenced by locally generated smoke and dust aerosols (median f(RH) = 1.55 and 1.59, respectively). IntroductionThe perturbation of climate through the scattering and absorption of solar radiation by anthropogenic aerosols has been termed direct aerosol radiative forcing. This forcing has been estimated globally to be of similar magnitude and opposite sign (i.e., a negative forcing) to greenhouse gas forcing

[1] Ambient measurements are reported of aerosol light absorption from photoacoustic and filter-based instruments (aethalometer and a particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP)) to provide insight on the measurement science. Measurements were obtained during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study at the Big Bend National Park in South Texas. The aethalometer measurements of black carbon concentration at this site correlate reasonably well with photoacoustic measurements of aerosol light absorption, with a slope of 8.1 m 2 /g and a small offset. Light absorption at this site never exceeded 2.1 Mm À1 during the month of collocated measurements. Measurements were also obtained, as a function of controlled relative humidity between 40% and 90%, during the Photoacoustic IOP in 2000 at the Department of Energy Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site (SGP). PSAP measurements of aerosol light absorption correlated very well with photoacoustic measurements, but the slope of the correlation indicated the PSAP values were larger by a factor of 1.61. The photoacoustic measurements of light absorption exhibited a systematic decrease when the RH increased beyond 70%. This apparent decrease in light absorption with RH may be due to the contribution of mass transfer to the photoacoustic signal. Model results for the limiting case of full water saturation are used to evaluate this hypothesis. A second PSAP measured the light absorption for the same humidified samples, and indicated very erratic response as the RH changed, suggesting caution when interpreting PSAP data under conditions of rapid relative humidity change.

A new multiangle absorption photometer for the measurement of aerosol light absorption was recently introduced that builds on the simultaneous measurement of radiation transmitted through and scattered back from a particle-loaded fiber filter at multiple detection angles. The absorption coefficient of the filter-deposited aerosol is calculated from the optical properties of the entire filter system, which are determined by a two-stream-approximation radiative transfer scheme. In the course of the Reno Aerosol Optics Study (RAOS), the response characteristics of multiangle absorption photometry (MAAP) for white aerosol, pure black carbon aerosol from different sources, external mixtures of black and white aerosol, and ambient aerosol was investigated. The MAAP response characteristics were compared to basic filter transmittance and filter reflectance measurements. MAAP showed close agreement with a reference absorption measurement by extinction minus scattering. The slopes of regression lines vary between 0.99 ± 0.01 and 1.07 ± 0.02 for pure black carbon particles and external mixtures with ammonium sulphate to 1.03 ± 0.05 for ambient aerosol. No effect of the filter aerosol loading or the single-scattering albedo ω 0 of the sampled aerosol on the MAAP response characteristics was observed. In contrast, transmittance and reflectance methods showed a clear impact of ω 0 and the filter loading on the response characteristics, which requires the application of a correction function for the reliable determination of the aerosol absorption coefficient. In the case of nonabsorbing aerosol, the MAAP approach reduced the magnitude of the apparently measured absorption coefficient by one order of magnitude compared to a basic transmittance measurement.

Abstract. Soot, which is produced from biomass burning and the incomplete combustion of fossil and biomass fuels, has been linked to regional and global climate change and to negative health problems. Scientists measure the properties of soot using a variety of methods in order to quantify source emissions and understand its atmospheric chemistry, reactivity under emission conditions, interaction with solar radiation, influence on clouds, and health impacts. A major obstacle currently limiting progress is the absence of established standards or reference materials for calibrating the many instruments used to measure the various properties of soot.The current state of availability and practicability of soot standard reference materials (SRMs) was reviewed by a group of 50 international experts during a workshop in June of 2011. The workshop was convened to summarize the current knowledge on soot measurement techniques, identify the measurement uncertainties and limitations related to the lack of soot SRMs, and identify attributes of SRMs that, if developed, would reduce measurement uncertainties. The workshop established that suitable SRMs are available for calibrating some, but not all, measurement methods. The community of users of the single-particle soot-photometer (SP2), an instrument using laser-induced incandescence, identified a suitable SRM, fullerene soot, but users of instruments that measure light absorption by soot collected on filters did not. Similarly, those who use thermal optical analysis (TOA) to analyze the organic and elemental carbon components of soot were not satisfied with current SRMs. The workshop, and subsequent, interactive discussions, produced a number of recommendations for the development of new SRMs, and their implementation, that would be suitable for the different soot measurement methods.