660 Background: Multiplex partial nephrectomy (MPN) remains the standard of care for hereditary and bilateral kidney tumors. Our institution is an international referral center for the management of hereditary renal cell carcinoma, and therefore has considerable experience with MPN. The objective of this study was to evaluate surgical learning curve for MPN among multiple surgeons at a single institution over an 11-year period. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained registry of patients who underwent MPN from 2007-present. The first 100 consecutive surgeries of 3 NIH fellowship trained Urologic Oncologists were identified and evaluated in quartiles. Surgical outcome measures including operative duration (OD), estimated blood loss (EBL), number of tumors resected, and complication rate were chosen as surrogate markers of learning curve. Differences in individual surgeon outcomes were evaluated and variables including re-do surgery and surgical approach were considered. Significant differences found among quartiles or among surgeon were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 300 MPN's were identified. In the quartile analysis, there were no significant differences in OD, EBL, numbers of tumors resected or rates of complication. Among surgeon factors, there were differences in surgical approach and EBL (table). In a multivariate analysis of factors associated with EBL, open approach (95%CI 245-831), p < 0.0001) and number of tumors (95%CI 43-82), p < 0.0001) were independently associated. No factors were associated increased rate of complication. Conclusions: As surgeons progressed through their first 100 operations, no true learning curve was appreciated, with similar outcomes in each quartile. Among surgeon factors, open surgical approach appears to drive difference in EBL.[Table: see text]
e17056 Background: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly utilized in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging. While there is Level 1 data supporting MRI utility in identifying clinically significant PCa and guiding PCa diagnosis, there is little data on its ability to predict surgical outcomes and its utility as a staging study. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of mpMRI in predicting common surgical pathology outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Men who underwent either open radical prostatectomy (ORP) or robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate adenocarcinoma from January-December 2021 at a single tertiary level care academic medical center were identified. Chart review for relevant patient demographics, mpMRI related variables and final surgical pathology was completed. In patients who had pre-operative mpMRI, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in predicting relevant surgical outcomes, including presence of pT2N0 organ confined disease (OCD), extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), lymph node involvement (LNI), and bladder neck invasion (BNI). Results: 168 eligible patients were identified in a 12-month period. The mean age was 63.5±6.24 years and mean Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 11.4±23.7, with 166 (98.8%) patients undergoing RALP and 115 (68.5%) having pre-operative mpMRI. Median GGG was 2 in both MRI and CT subsets (p = 0.580), and patients who had pre-op MRI were more likely to have higher PSA (12.7 ±28.1 vs 8.38± 6.32, p = 0.073) and clinically node positive disease (p < 0.001) than those with CT. However, there was no significant difference in final surgical pathology or positive surgical margin rates between these two groups. On subset analysis of the MRI subset, Table summarizes the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of pre-op MRI to predict OCD, ECE, SVI, LNI, and BNI. While specificity of pre-op MRI was adequate for all outcomes (89.1-100%), sensitivity (2.9-49.2%), PPV (40-100%), and NPV (56.3-94.3%) were poor. Conclusions: At present, pre-op MRI of the prostate does not appear to be accurate in its ability to predict important pathologic outcomes at the time of radical prostatectomy and should be used cautiously as a local staging tool. More work is needed before MRI can be used as a reliable staging tool for PCa.[Table: see text]
108 Background: MRI fusion prostate biopsy has been shown to improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, however the degree of this benefit is poorly characterized in large clinical trials. Methods: 1750 MRI targeted plus sextant biopsies were performed in 1742 male patients from 2007 to 2017. Patient demographics, PSA, prostate volume, primary and secondary Gleason scores, Johns Hopkins Grade Groups, number of MRI targeted lesions, number of cores obtained, and biopsy yield were recorded. Results: The patient population consisted of men averaging 62.9-year-old (36-86) with a mean PSA 9.6ng/mL, and prostate volume of 59.2 ml. A total of 804 cancers were detected on sextant biopsy and 839 were detected on MRI targeted biopsy. Relative to targeted biopsy, sextant biopsy detected only significantly more Gleason 6 disease (14% vs 21.5%, p < 0.0001) than targeted biopsy. Targeted biopsy detected more Gleason 7 (21% vs 16.6%, p = 0.0009) and Gleason 8-10 (13.4% vs 9.4%). Additionally, Gleason 7 sub-stratification demonstrated substantially more Gleason 4+3 detection in targeted group vs sextant biopsy (4% vs 0.5%, p < 0.0001). When stratified by Grade Group targeted biopsy detected 76% more Grade Group 3-5 cancers (p < 0.0001) and 17.7% less Gleason Group 1-2 cancers (p < 0.0001). Only 1.7% of Grade Group 3-5 cancers were detected on sextant biopsy alone, where as 15.7% of Grade Group 3-5 cancers were detected on targeted biopsy alone. Conclusions: MRI targeted biopsy significantly increases the likelihood of detecting clinically significant cancer and decreases the risk of indolent cancer detection. These finding strongly support the use of MRI targeted biopsy when possible.
101 Background: Prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can precisely depict prostate cancer (PCa) location and adverse pathologic features. Surgeons can utilize this information to maximize sparing of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) during radical prostatectomy (RP) while avoiding a positive surgical margin (PSM). We detail the technique of using preoperative mpMRI to quantify its effect regarding nerve-sparing and rates of PSMs. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was queried for robotic-assisted RPs (RARPs) with preoperative mpMRI between 2007-2017. Imaging margin risk factors (iMRF) were defined on mpMRI as frank extraprostatic extension (EPE), possible EPE, and capsular irregularity (capsular bulge, lesion-capsule contact, or lesion adjacency to the neurovascular bundles). Surgical adjustments to nerve-sparing technique (full sparing, partial sparing, and wide excision) were made based on these findings. Results: Five hundred thirty-two patients comprising 1041 prostate sides were included for analysis. Overall, PSM rate was found in 80/1041 (7.7%) sides of the prostate. iMRF were seen in 313/1041 (30.1%) prostate sides, for which adjustments were made in 244/313 (78.0%) of these. In the 69/244 (22.0%) cases where full nerve-sparing was performed despite iMRF, PSM rate was 20/69 (29%) compared to 33/244 (13.5%), p = 0.002. MRI-guided surgical adjustments decreased PSM risk by 68% and 15% in pT3 and pT2 cases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, logPSA (odds ratio [OR] 4.06, [95% CI 2.40-12.3], p < 0.001) and iMRF (OR 1.78, [95% CI 1.01-3.16], p = 0.047) were significantly associated with PSM while nerve-sparing adjustment was significantly associated with decreased risk of PSM (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.22-0.66], p = 0.001). Conclusions: MRI effectively detects risks for PSM and guides surgical adjustments to decrease PSM rates. As prostate MRI is more frequently acquired for PCa screening and biopsy, we show its additional value for RP planning and potentially improved outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.