SummaryThe measurement of crosslinked fibrin derivatives in plasma has received evaluation as a screening test in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Plasma samples were taken from 104 patients undergoing venography because of clinical suspicion of lower limb venous thrombosis. The samples were assayed using a monoclonal antibody identifying an epitope on D dimer and larger crosslinked fibrin derivatives in an enzyme immunoassay. 100% of patients with positive venograms had elevated levels of these molecules. While a percentage of patients with negative venograms also had increased levels, alternative clinical explanations were apparent in most. A normal D dimer value excludes the diagnosis of venous thrombosis, while an increased value supports it. The measurement of crosslinked fibrin derivatives in plasma may play a role in the selection of patients for venography.
Background Long‐term sequelae of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) include decreased quality of life (QoL). Evidence suggests that adequacy of initial anticoagulant treatment in the acute phase of venous thrombosis has a key impact on late postthrombotic complications. We hypothesize that patients with acute PE treated with edoxaban for acute PE experience have improved QoL compared to those treated with warfarin. Methods Patients with PE who participated in the Hokusai‐VTE trial were contacted between June 2017 and September 2020 for a single long‐term follow‐up visit. Main outcomes were the generic and disease‐specific QoL measured by the 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire. Results We included 251 patients from 26 centers in eight countries, of which 129 (51%) had been assigned to edoxaban and 122 (49%) to warfarin. Patient‐ and thrombus‐specific characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean time since randomization in the Hokusai‐VTE trial was 7.0 years (standard deviation, 1.0). No relevant or statistical differences were observed in the QoL for patients treated with edoxaban compared to patients treated with warfarin. The mean difference between patients treated with edoxaban and patients with PE treated with warfarin was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]. −1.6 to 3.2) for the SF‐36 summary mental score and 1.6 (95% CI, −0.9 to 4.1) for summary physical score. Conclusion Our findings indicate that patients with an index PE treated with edoxaban or warfarin have a similar long‐term QoL. Since our study was a follow‐up study from a well‐controlled clinical trial setting, future studies should be designed in a daily clinical practice setting. We suggest a longitudinal design for investigation of changes in QoL over time.
A 65-year-old woman called paramedics for stridor and neck swelling following an insect bite with a possible anaphylactic reaction. On arrival paramedics administered intramuscular epinephrine without any observed improvement in stridor. Paramedics then prepared 5 mg of 1:1000 epinephrine for nebulised administration, which was inadvertently given intravenously. The patient developed tachycardia, anxiety and a severe headache, with biochemical evidence of cardiac necrosis without any haemodynamic compromise. The patient recovered over the next 24 hours and no long-term sequelae were identified on CT coronary angiogram, electrocardiography (ECG) echocardiography or invasive angiography. This case highlights the risk of cardiac ischaemia during epinephrine administration and the importance of protocols to ensure appropriate dosing. This case also raises questions regarding appropriate management of epinephrine overdose and shines a light on the absence of guidelines on the prevention of complications from epinephrine administration.
Background Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a long‐term complication after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and can affect quality of life (QoL). Pathogenesis is not fully understood but inadequate anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists is a known risk factor for the development of PTS. Objectives To compare the prevalence of PTS after acute DVT and the long‐term QoL following DVT between patients treated with edoxaban or warfarin. Methods We performed a long‐term follow‐up study in a subset of patients with DVT who participated in the Hokusai‐VTE trial between 2010 and 2012 (NCT00986154). Primary outcome was the prevalence of PTS, defined by the Villalta score. The secondary outcome was QoL, assessed by validated disease‐specific (VEINES‐QOL) and generic health‐related (SF‐36) questionnaires. Results Between 2017 and 2020, 316 patients were enrolled in 26 centers in eight countries, of which 168 (53%) patients had been assigned to edoxaban and 148 (47%) to warfarin during the Hokusai‐VTE trial. Clinical, demographic, and thrombus‐specific characteristics were comparable for both groups. Mean (SD) time since randomization in the Hokusai‐VTE trial was 7.0 (1.0) years. PTS was diagnosed in 85 (51%) patients treated with edoxaban and 62 (42%) patients treated with warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.6). Mean differences in QoL scores between treatment groups were not clinically relevant. Conclusion Contrary to our hypothesis, the prevalence of PTS tended to be higher in patients treated with edoxaban compared with warfarin. No differences in QoL were observed. Further research is warranted to unravel the role of anticoagulant therapy on development of PTS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.