Summary Background Reoperation rates are high after surgery for hip fractures. We investigated the effect of a sliding hip screw versus cancellous screws on the risk of reoperation and other key outcomes. Methods For this international, multicentre, allocation concealed randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 50 years or older with a low-energy hip fracture requiring fracture fixation from 81 clinical centres in eight countries. Patients were assigned by minimisation with a centralised computer system to receive a single large-diameter screw with a side-plate (sliding hip screw) or the present standard of care, multiple small-diameter cancellous screws. Surgeons and patients were not blinded but the data analyst, while doing the analyses, remained blinded to treatment groups. The primary outcome was hip reoperation within 24 months after initial surgery to promote fracture healing, relieve pain, treat infection, or improve function. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761813. Findings Between March 3, 2008, and March 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 1108 patients to receive a sliding hip screw (n=557) or cancellous screws (n=551). Reoperations within 24 months did not differ by type of surgical fixation in those included in the primary analysis: 107 (20%) of 542 patients in the sliding hip screw group versus 117 (22%) of 537 patients in the cancellous screws group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.63–1.09; p=0.18). Avascular necrosis was more common in the sliding hip screw group than in the cancellous screws group (50 patients [9%] vs 28 patients [5%]; HR 1.91, 1.06–3.44; p=0.0319). However, no significant difference was found between the number of medically related adverse events between groups (p=0.82; appendix); these events included pulmonary embolism (two patients [<1%] vs four [1%] patients; p=0.41) and sepsis (seven [1%] vs six [1%]; p=0.79). Interpretation In terms of reoperation rates the sliding hip screw shows no advantage, but some groups of patients (smokers and those with displaced or base of neck fractures) might do better with a sliding hip screw than with cancellous screws. Funding National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Stichting NutsOhra, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Physicians’ Services Incorporated.

No abstract

Purpose. To classify the spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from infected hip and knee arthroplasty specimens, and to recommend appropriate empiric peri-operative antibiotics. Methods. From January 1999 to August 2006, specimens from revision hip and knee arthroplasties (with or without suspected infection) were routinely collected for identifying possible organisms and their susceptibility patterns. During the period, 147 patients had positive specimens yielding 248 micro-organisms (from 195 tissue specimens, 43 fluid specimens, and 10 swabs). 140 isolates were from hips and 108 from knees. Results. Most isolates were Gram-positive; their distribution was similar in hip and knee specimens. Of the 248 micro-organisms isolated, Staphylococcus was the most common genus encountered (131, 53%), followed by Gram-negative isolates (24%). 88% of Gram-negative organisms were detected within 48 hours of inoculation and 94% of Grampositive organisms within 96 hours. Overall, 46% of Surgery 2008;16(3):339-42 isolates were susceptible to cephalothin. Only 35% of coagulase-negative staphylococci were sensitive to cephalothin. No Gram-positive vancomycin resistance was encountered. Conclusion. Empiric prophylactic antibiotics for revision hip and knee arthroplasties should include vancomycin to cover Gram-positive organisms and gentamicin for most Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Orthopaedic