IPCH and PP are able to achieve unexpected long-term survival in patients with bulky PC. However, one must be careful when selecting the patients for such an aggressive treatment, as morbidity rate remains high even for an experienced team.

This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e19. Learning Objective: Upon completion of this CME activity successful learners will be able to (1) evaluate the probability of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); (2) identify the risk factors for VTE in patients with PDAC; and (3) assess the impact of VTE on survival in patients with PDAC. Venous Thromboembolism and Pancreatic CancerThe BACAP-VTE Study : pancreatic cancer patients prospectively followed-up from time of enrollment until last visit or death 152 patients (20.79%) developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 19.3 months Patients developing VTE during follow-up had lower PFS (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.19-2.54, P=.004) Patients developing VTE during follow-up had lower OS (HR 2.02, 95%CI 1.57-2.60, P<.001).

No abstract

No abstract

The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.