Since January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a far-reaching impact on global morbidity and mortality. The effects of varying degrees of implementation of public health and social measures between countries is evident in terms of widely differing disease burdens and levels of disruption to public health systems. Despite Thailand being the first country outside China to report a positive case of COVID-19, the subsequent number of cases and deaths has been much lower than in many other countries. As of 7 January 2021, the number of confirmed COVID-19-positive cases in Thailand was 9636 (138 per million population) and the number of deaths was 67 (1 per million population). We describe the nature of the health workforce and function that facilitated the capacity to respond to this pandemic. We also describe the public health policies (laboratory testing, test-and-trace system and mandatory 14-day quarantine of cases) and social interventions (daily briefings, restriction of mobility and social gatherings, and wearing of face masks) that allowed the virus to be successfully contained. To enhance the capacity of health-care workers to respond to the pandemic, the government (i) mobilized staff to meet the required surge capacity; (ii) developed and implemented policies to protect occupational safety; and (iii) initiated packages to support morale and well-being. The results of the policies that we describe are evident in the data: of the 66 countries with more than 100 COVID-19-positive cases in health-care workers as at 8 May 2020, Thailand ranked 65th.
Objective: On 1 December 2020, the Department of Disease Control of Thailand was notified of a cluster of food poisoning cases among participants at a church festival in Mae Ai district, Chiang Mai province. We conducted an outbreak investigation to confirm diagnosis, describe the epidemiological characteristics of the outbreak, identify possible sources of the outbreak and provide appropriate control measures. Methods:We reviewed medical records of the food poisoning cases from the health care centres. Active case finding was conducted among participants who had consumed food and water at the festival. An environmental survey was done in the village where the festival was held. A case-control study was conducted to identify the source of the outbreak. Samples for laboratory analysis included rectal swabs and fresh stool specimens from the cases and food handlers, surface swabs of cooking equipment, food, water and ice samples.Results: Among 436 participants surveyed, 368 (84.4%) cases of food poisoning were identified. The most common clinical manifestation was abdominal pain (89.7%), followed by watery diarrhoea (45.7%), nausea (43.5%), vomiting (38.9%), fever (18.5%) and bloody diarrhoea (4.6%). None died in this outbreak. The case-control study showed that mixed spicy seafood salad served in the festival was significantly associated with the disease by both univariable and multivariable analyses. However, the causative agent could not be identified. The environmental investigation suggested this seafood might have been undercooked. Conclusion:Clinical manifestations of the cases, incubation period and the suspected seafood salad suggested seafood-related food poisoning. Grimontia hollisae, the organism causing illness similar to Vibrio parahaemolyticus and commonly undetectable in the laboratory with routine testing, might be the pathogen that caused this outbreak.G. hollisae should be in differential diagnosis and identified in seafood-associated outbreaks.
On 23 Mar 2020, the Situation Awareness Team of the Emergency Operations Center, Department of Disease Control, was notified that a 44-year-old Thai male, who was infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), had died in a private hospital in Bangkok, and there was a suspicion that some healthcare workers were infected with SARS-CoV-2 following his death. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. We reviewed medical records of the index case, interviewed relatives of the index case, and performed contact tracing using a standard questionnaire. We could identify 206 high-risk contacts. Twenty out of 206 high-risk contacts were then found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2. Fifteen of them were healthcare workers, two of them were current inpatients, and the other three were household contacts. The likely cause of disease spreading was the missed diagnosis of COVID-19 as the index case did not present with upper respiratory tract symptoms at the first visit to the hospital. Meal sharing among healthcare workers and sharing of a portable chest X-ray machine without proper protective equipment potentially served as other causes of COVID-19 spreading.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.