Non-autonomous thyroid nodules are common in the general population with a proportion found to be cancerous. A current challenge in the field is to be able to distinguish benign adenoma (FA) from preoperatively malignant thyroid follicular carcinoma (FTC), which are very similar both histologically and genetically. One controversial issue, which is currently not understood, is whether both tumor types represent different molecular entities or rather a biological continuum.To gain a better insight into FA and FTC tumorigenesis, we defined their molecular profiles by mRNA and miRNA microarray. Expression data were analyzed, validated by qRT-PCR and compared with previously published data sets.The majority of deregulated mRNAs were common between FA and FTC and were downregulated, however FTC showed additional deregulated mRNA. Both types of tumors share deregulated pathways, molecular functions and biological processes. The additional deregulations in FTC include the lipid transport process that may be involved in tumor progression. The strongest candidate genes which may be able to discriminate follicular adenomas and carcinomas, CRABP1, FABP4 and HMGA2, were validated in independent samples by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. However, they were not able to adequately classify FA or FTC, supporting the notion of continuous evolving tumors, whereby FA and FTC appear to show quantitative rather than qualitative changes. Conversely, miRNA expression profiles showed few dysregulations in FTC, and even fewer in FA, suggesting that miRNA play a minor, if any, role in tumor progression.

Predictive biomarkers are eagerly awaited in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Targeted sequencing performed on tumor and baseline plasma samples in 20 patients with aCRC treated with regorafenib identified 89 tumor-specific mutations of which ≥50% are also present in baseline plasma. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays were optimized to monitor circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels in plasmatic samples collected throughout the treatment course and showed the importance of using the absolute value for ctDNA rather than the mutant/wild type ratio in monitoring the therapy outcome. High baseline cell free DNA (cfDNA) levels are associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (HR 7.38, P=0.001). An early increase (D14) in mutated copies/mL is associated with a significantly worse PFS (HR 6.12, P=0.008) and OS (HR 8.02, P=0.004). These data suggest a high prognostic value for early ctDNA level changes and support the use of blood-born genomic markers as a tool for treatment.

Baseline whole-body metabolically active tumor volume (WB-MATV) measured by 18 F-FDG PET/CT and circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been separately validated as predictors of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study assessed the correlation between WB-MATV and cfDNA, evaluating the added prognostic value of these in combination, along with clinical parameters. Methods: Of 141 mCRC patients included in a prospective multicenter trial, 132 were evaluable for OS/PFS. cfDNA was extracted from 3 mL of plasma and quantified using a fluorometer. All target lesions were delineated on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and their metabolic volumes were summed to obtain the WB-MATV. Results: Baseline WB-MATV and cfDNA were strongly correlated (r 5 0.70; P , 0.001) but showed discordance in 23 of 132 (17%) patients. A multivariate analysis identified 3 independent negative predictors of PFS (high cfDNA, short time since diagnosis, and body mass index , 30) and 5 of OS (high cfDNA, high WB-MATV, body mass index , 30, poor performance status, and short time since diagnosis). Combining WB-MATV and cfDNA increased the overall prognostic value and allowed identification of a subgroup of patients with low cfDNA and high WB-MATV who were associated with intermediate survival (median OS of 8.1 for low-cfDNA/high-MATV patients vs. 12.7 mo for low-cfDNA/low-MATV patients; hazard ratio, 2.04; P 5 0.02). Conclusion: This study confirms the added prognostic value of combined circulating cfDNA and PET-based WB-MATV in chemorefractory mCRC patients. The combination of these two biomarkers should provide a firm basis for risk stratification, both in clinical practice and in research trials.

Background: High-throughput sequencing technologies are increasingly used in research but limited data are available on the feasibility and value of these when routinely adopted in clinical practice.Material and methods: We analyzed all consecutive cancer patients for whom genomic testing by a 48-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (Truseq Amplicon Cancer Panel, Illumina) was requested as part of standard care in one of the largest Belgian cancer networks between 2014 and 2019. Feasibility of NGS was assessed in all study patients, while the impact of NGS on the decision making was analyzed in the group of gastrointestinal cancer patients.Results: Tumor samples from 1064 patients with varying tumor types were tested, the number of NGS requests increasing over time (p < .0001). Success rate and median turnaround time were 91.4% and 12.5 days, respectively, both significantly decreasing over time (p ≤ .0002). Non-surgical sampling procedure (OR 7.97, p < .0001), tissue from metastatic site (OR 2.35, p = .0006) and more recent year of testing (OR 1.79, p = .0258) were independently associated with NGS failure. Excluding well-known actionable or clinically relevant mutations which are recommended by international guidelines and commonly tested by targeted sequencing, 57/279 (20.4%) assessable gastrointestinal cancer patients were found to have tumors harboring at least one actionable altered gene according to the OncoKB database. NGS results, however, had a direct impact on management decisions by the treating physician in only 3 cases (1.1%).Conclusions: Our findings confirm that NGS is feasible in the clinical setting with acceptably low failure rates and rapid turnaround time. In gastrointestinal cancers, however, NGS-based multiplegene testing adds very little to standard targeted sequencing, and in routine practice the clinical impact of NGS panels including genes which are not routinely recommended by international guidelines remains limited.