No abstract

This review evaluates the status of standardization of lipids and lipoproteins.

Background: Accurate and precise measurement of blood cholesterol plays a central role in the National Cholesterol Education Program’s strategy to reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to coronary heart disease. Matrix effects hamper the ability of manufacturers to adequately calibrate and validate traceability to the National Reference System for Cholesterol (NRS/CHOL). CDC created the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) to improve cholesterol measurement by assisting manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic products with validation of the traceability of their assays to the NRS/CHOL. Methods: CRMLN laboratories established the CDC cholesterol reference method (modification of the Abell-Levy-Brodie-Kendall chemical method) and are standardized using CDC frozen serum reference materials. CRMLN laboratories use common quality-control materials and participate in monthly external performance evaluations conducted by CDC. The CRMLN performance criteria require member laboratories to agree with CDC within ± 1.0% and maintain a CV ≤2.0%. Results: From 1995 to 2000, the CRMLN laboratories met the accuracy criterion 97% of the time and the precision criterion 99% of the time. During this time period, the CRMLN maintained an average bias to CDC of 0.01% and an average collective CV of 0.33%. Conclusions: CDC established the CRMLN as the first international reference method laboratory network. The CRMLN assists manufacturers in the validation of the calibration of their diagnostic products so that clinical laboratories can measure blood cholesterol more reliably. The CRMLN can serve as a model for other clinical analytes where traceability to a hierarchy of methods is needed and matrix effects of the field methods with processed calibrators or reference materials are present.

Background: Homogeneous LDL-cholesterol methods from Genzyme, Reference Diagnostics, Roche, and Sigma were evaluated for precision, accuracy, and specificity for LDL in the presence of abnormal lipoproteins. Methods: Each homogeneous method was performed by a Roche/Hitachi 911 according to the vendors’ instructions, and the results were compared with the β-quantification reference method. We measured precision over 20 days using quality-control and frozen serum specimens. Sera from 100 study participants, including 60 with hyperlipidemias, were assayed by each method. Accuracy was evaluated from regression and total error analysis. Specificity was evaluated from the bias (as a percentage) vs concentration of triglycerides. Results: The total CV was <2% for all methods. Regression slope and intercept (with 95% confidence intervals) were as follows: Genzyme, 0.955 (0.92 to 0.99) and 30.3 (−12 to 73) mg/L; Reference Diagnostics, 0.975 (0.93 to 1.02) and −8 (−63 to 47) mg/L; Roche, 1.067 (1.02 to 1.11) and −101 (−161 to −42) mg/L; and Sigma, 0.964 (0.91 to 1.02) and 164 (89 to 239) mg/L. The percentages of individual results with >12% bias were as follows: Genzyme, 8.0%; Reference Diagnostics, 11.0%; Roche, 10.0%; and Sigma, 30.0%. Total error calculated from mean systematic bias and all-sources random bias was as follows: Genzyme, 12.6%; Reference Diagnostics, 16.5%; Roche, 41.6%; and Sigma, 38.3%. Slopes of bias (as a percentage) vs triglycerides were P <0.001 for all methods except the Roche method, which was P = 0.094. Conclusions: The evaluated methods show nonspecificity toward abnormal lipoproteins, thus compromising their ability to satisfy the National Cholesterol Education Program goal for a total error of <12%. These homogeneous LDL-cholesterol results do not improve on the performance of LDL-cholesterol calculated by the Friedewald equation at triglyceride concentrations <4000 mg/L.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract