Emerging evidence suggests that the cellular actions of flavonoids relate not simply to their antioxidant potential but also to the modulation of protein kinase signalling pathways. We investigated in primary cortical neurons, the ability of the flavan-3-ol, (-)epicatechin, and its human metabolites at physiologically relevant concentrations, to stimulate phosphorylation of the transcription factor cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB), a regulator of neuronal viability and synaptic plasticity. (-)Epicatechin at 100-300 nmol/L stimulated a rapid, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-and PI3K-dependent, increase in CREB phosphorylation. At micromolar concentrations, stimulation was no longer apparent and at the highest concentration tested (30 lmol/L) (-)epicatechin was inhibitory. (-)Epicatechin also stimulated ERK and Akt phosphorylation with similar bell-shaped concentration-response characteristics. The human metabolite 3¢-O-methyl-(-)epicatechin was as effective as (-)epicatechin at stimulating ERK phosphorylation, but (-)epicatechin glucuronide was inactive. (-)Epicatechin and 3¢-O-methyl-(-)epicatechin treatments (100 nmol/L) increased CRE-luciferase activity in cortical neurons in a partially ERK-dependent manner, suggesting the potential to increase CREB-mediated gene expression. mRNA levels of the glutamate receptor subunit GluR2 increased by 60%, measured 18 h after a 15 min exposure to (-)epicatechin and this translated into an increase in GluR2 protein. Thus, (-)epicatechin has the potential to increase CREB-regulated gene expression and increase GluR2 levels and thus modulate neurotransmission, plasticity and synaptogenesis.
The rat SK1 gene (rSK1) does not form functional Ca2+‐activated potassium channels when expressed alone in mammalian cell lines. Using a selective antibody to the rSK1 subunit and a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tag we have discovered that rSK1 expression produces protein that remains largely at intracellular locations. We tested the idea that rSK1 may need an expression partner, rSK2, in order to form functional channels. When rSK1 was co‐expressed with rSK2 in HEK 293 cells it increased the current magnitude by 77 ± 34 % (as compared with cells expressing rSK2 alone). Co‐expression of rSK1 with rSK2 also changed the channel pharmacology. The sensitivity of SK current to block by apamin was reduced ~16‐fold from an IC50 of 94 pm (for SK2 alone) to 1.4 nm (for SK2 and SK1 together). The sensitivity to block by UCL 1848 (a potent small molecule blocker of SK channels) was similarly reduced, ~26‐fold, from an IC50 of 110 pm to 2.9 nm. These data clearly demonstrate that rSK1 and rSK2 subunits interact. The most likely explanation for this is that the subunits are able to form heteromeric assemblies.
The aim of this study was to determine whether functional heteromeric channels can be formed by co-assembly of rat SK3 (rSK3) potassium channel subunits with either SK1 or SK2 subunits. First, to determine whether rSK3 could co-assemble with rSK2 we created rSK3VK (an SK3 mutant insensitive to block by UCL 1848). When rSK3VK was co-expressed with rSK2 the resulting currents had an intermediate sensitivity to UCL 1848 (IC 50 of ϳ5 nM compared with 120 pM for rSK2 and >300 nM for rSK3VK), suggesting that rSK3 and rSK2 can form functional heteromeric channels. To detect co-assembly of SK3 with SK1, we initially used a dominant negative construct of the human SK1 subunit (hSK1YP). hSK1YP dramatically reduced the SK3 current, supporting the idea that SK3 and SK1 subunits also interact. To determine whether these assemblies were functional we created rSK3VF, an rSK3 mutant with an enhanced affinity for tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA) (IC 50 of 0.3 mM). Co-transfection of rSK3VF and hSK1 produced currents with a sensitivity to TEA not different from that of hSK1 alone (IC 50 ϳ15 mM). These results suggest that hSK1 does not produce functional cell-surface assemblies with SK3. Antibody-staining experiments suggested that hSK1 may reduce the number of functional SK3 subunits reaching the cell surface. Additional experiments showed that co-expression of the rat SK1 gene with SK3 also dramatically suppressed SK current. The pharmacology of the residual current was consistent with that of homomeric SK3 assemblies. These results demonstrate interactions that cause changes in protein trafficking, cell surface expression, and channel pharmacology and strongly suggest heteromeric assembly of SK3 with the other SK channel subunits.Small conductance Ca 2ϩ -activated potassium channels (SK 1 channels) are widely expressed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. In many neurons SK channels underlie some components of the post-spike after-hyperpolarization (see e.g. Ref. 1). They also have important functions in nonneuronal tissues. Native SK channels have a characteristic pharmacology. They can be blocked by the bee venom toxin apamin and several selective small molecule blockers that we have developed (such as UCL 1848) that are active at nanomolar or subnanomolar concentrations (2-4).Molecular cloning studies have identified three closely related genes (SK1, -2, and -3) which code for SK channel subunits in mammalian cells (5-7). In both Xenopus oocytes and mammalian cell lines, expression of the rat homologues of SK2 and SK3 (rSK2 and rSK3 respectively) results in the formation of functional homomeric SK channels. Further, both homomeric rSK2 and homomeric rSK3 channels can be blocked by either apamin or UCL 1848 at concentrations that are similar to those reported for native channels (8). The potencies of both compounds depend on the subunit composition of the channel, with the IC 50 for blocking homomeric SK2 channels being ϳ18-fold lower than for SK3.The behavior of SK1 is different to that of other SK genes....
Electrophiles produced during oxidative stress trigger pain responses by reacting with TRPA1 ion channels on sensory nerves. Bahia et al. show that residue C621 on TRPA1 has remarkable reactivity with electrophiles—more than cellular antioxidants—and is crucial for this sensory response.
Mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent oxidative stress has been reported for a variety of cell types in inflammatory diseases. Given the abundance of mitochondria at the peripheral terminals of sensory nerves and the sensitivity of transient receptor potential (TRP) ankyrin 1 (A1) and TRP vanilloid 1 (V1) to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and their downstream products of lipid peroxidation, we investigated the effect of nerve terminal mitochondrial dysfunction on airway sensory nerve excitability. Here we show that mitochondrial dysfunction evoked by acute treatment with antimycin A (mitochondrial complex III Q i site inhibitor) preferentially activated TRPA1-expressing "nociceptor-like" mouse bronchopulmonary C-fibers. Action potential discharge was reduced by the TRPA1 antagonist HC-030031. Inhibition of TRPV1 further reduced C-fiber activation. In mouse dissociated vagal neurons, antimycin A induced Ca 21 influx that was significantly reduced by pharmacological inhibition or genetic knockout of either TRPA1 or TRPV1. Inhibition of both TRPA1 and TRPV1 was required to abolish antimycin A-induced Ca 21 influx in vagal neurons. Using an HEK293 cell expression system, antimycin A induced concentration-dependent activation of both hTRPA1 and hTRPV1 but failed to activate nontransfected cells. Myxothiazol (complex III Q o site inhibitor) inhibited antimycin A-induced TRPA1 activation, as did the reducing agent dithiothreitol. Scavenging of both superoxide and hydrogen peroxide inhibited TRPA1 activation following mitochondrial modulation. In conclusion, we present evidence that acute mitochondrial dysfunction activates airway sensory nerves preferentially via TRPA1 through the actions of mitochondrially-derived ROS. This represents a novel mechanism by which inflammation may be transduced into nociceptive electrical signaling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.