Background:
Pregnancy in a woman's life is associated with many physiological changes in the body due to alterations in the hormone levels. These altered hormonal levels are associated with many systemic diseases. The incidence of oral diseases in general and periodontal diseases in particular are higher in pregnant women, with gingivitis and periodontitis being the most common. Furthermore, it has been evidenced in literature that periodontal diseases are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm low birth weight and preeclampsia.
Aims and Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral health knowledge among pregnant women visiting and not visiting a dental professional.
Materials and Methods:
The study was a survey-based one with a sample size of 260. The study population was divided into two groups based on their visits to a dentist. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions has been used to assess their awareness and attitude towards oral health.
Results:
The awareness regarding oral health and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes among the study population was very low, irrespective of their dental visit. Furthermore, majority of the study population in neither of the groups were aware that dental treatment was safe during pregnancy.
Conclusion:
The results of the study clearly reflected that the awareness levels among the pregnant women regarding this association were low. Hence, more collective efforts are required from dental and medical professionals to improve the oral and periodontal health outcomes during pregnancy.
Background:
Root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is gold standard with few drawbacks such as requirement of second surgical site, reduced donor tissue availability, and increased surgical complications and pain. Periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) due to its rich source of pluripotent stem cells and nonrequirement of second surgical site could be a successful alternative for invasive SCTG. Therefore, current research aims to compare the amount of root coverage obtained with PPG to SCTG.
Materials and Methods:
Fifty-two single gingival recessions were included in the sample, with 26 patients allocated to the SCTG (control) and PPG (test) groups at random. At baseline, 3, and 6 months after surgery, clinical measurements of probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and width of keratinized tissue were taken.
Results:
Both procedures, i.e., SCTG and PPG, resulted in root coverage to a variable extent and a significant decrease in RD (1.69, 1.38 mm in SCTG and PPG groups, respectively) and RW, CAL gain is found in both the groups without any intergroup statistical variance. Complete root coverage (CRC) was obtained in 14 out of 26, i.e., 53.8% defects in both SCTG and PPG groups. A better comfort level is found in the group treated with PPG.
Conclusion:
Gingival recessions can be successfully treated with PPG, which has predictability comparable to SCTG and does not require a second surgical site.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.