Pharmacokinetics (PK) plays a key role in bridging drug efficacy and safety from adults to pediatric patients. The principal purpose of projecting dosing in pediatrics is to guide trial design, not to waive the study per se. This research was designed to evaluate whether the allometric scaling (AS) approach is a satisfactory method to design PK studies in pediatric patients aged 2 years and older. We systematically evaluated drugs that had pediatric label information updated from 1998 to 2015. Only intravenous (IV) or oral administration drugs with available PK information in both children and adults from FDA-approved labels were included. The allometric scaling approach was used to extrapolate adult clearance to pediatric clearance. The relative difference between the observed and the allometric scaling approach-predicted clearance was summarized and used to evaluate the predictive power of the allometric scaling approach. A total of 36 drugs eliminated by a metabolic pathway and 10 drugs by the renal pathway after intravenous (IV) or oral administration were included. Regardless of the administration route, elimination pathway, and age group, the allometric scaling approach can predict clearance in pediatric patients within a 2-fold difference; 18 of the included drugs were predicted within a 25% difference, and 31 drugs within a 50% difference. The allometric scaling approach can adequately design PK studies in pediatric subjects 2 years and older.
For the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today's standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium's use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification.
Purpose
A well-defined and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument for COVID-19 is important for assessing symptom severity and supporting research studies. The InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) instrument has been expanded to include loss of taste and smell in the FLU-PRO Plus, to comprehensively cover COVID-19 symptoms. Our studies were designed to evaluate and validate the FLU-PRO Plus among patients with COVID-19.
Methods
Two studies were conducted: (1) a qualitative, non-interventional, cross-sectional study of patients with COVID-19 involving hybrid concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews; (2) a psychometric evaluation of the measurement properties of FLU-PRO Plus, using data from COMET-ICE (COVID-19 Monoclonal antibody Efficacy Trial—Intent to Care Early).
Results
In the qualitative interviews (n = 30), all 34 items of the FLU-PRO Plus were considered relevant to COVID-19, and participants determined the questionnaire was easily understood, well written, and comprehensive. In the psychometric evaluation (n = 845), the internal consistency reliability of FLU-PRO Plus total score was 0.94, ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 for domain scores. Reproducibility (Day 20–21) was 0.83 for total score, with domain scores of 0.67–0.89. Confirmatory factor analysis with the novel smell/taste domain demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data.
Conclusion
The content, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the FLU-PRO Plus in the COVID-19 population were supported. Our results suggest that FLU-PRO Plus is a content- and psychometrically-valid, fit-for-purpose measure which is easily understood by patients. FLU-PRO Plus is a suitable PRO measure for evaluating symptoms of COVID-19 and treatment benefit directly from the patient perspective.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04545060, September 10, 2020; retrospectively registered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.