Objective:To investigate the impact of interferon-beta (IFN) on disease progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Methods: A cohort of 1,504 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (1,103 IFN-treated and 401 untreated) patients was followed for up to 7 years. Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for propensity score inverse weighting was used to assess the differences between the two groups for three different clinical end points: secondary progression (SP) and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores 4 and 6. Times from first visit and from date of birth were used as survival time variables. Results: The IFN-treated group showed a highly significant reduction in the incidence of SP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 -0.58 for time from 1st visit; HR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.23-0.56 for time from date of birth; p Ͻ 0.0001), EDSS score of 4 (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.94 for time from first visit; HR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.52-0.93 for time from date of birth; p Ͻ 0.02), and EDSS score of 6 (HR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.38 -0.95 for time from first visit; HR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.34 -0.86 for time from date of birth; p Յ 0.03) when compared with untreated patients. SP and EDSS scores of 4 and 6 were reached with significant delays estimated by times from first visit (3.8, 1.7, and 2.2 years) and from date of birth (8.7, 4.6, and 11.7 years) in favor of treated patients. Sensitivity analysis confirmed findings. Interpretation: IFN- slows progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.Ann Neurol 2007;61: 300 -306 Few experienced in the long-term management of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients would disagree that the development of unremitting disability progression represents the major adverse event in the course of this illness, and as a consequence, it is the most important target for clinical trials to evaluate their real cost effectiveness. Whether long-term treatment with the current interferon- (IFN) products in relapsingremitting MS (RRMS) can alter the development of long-term disability is not yet known, but it can be surmised from short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 1-3 and their continuous extensions at no more than 4 years 4 and 5 years. 5 This is the stage at which immunomodulatory therapy is likely to be most effective, but then the long-term benefits on disability have to be projected from the results generated during a much earlier and briefer period in the natural disease course. Long-term RCTs would undoubtedly provide definitive evidence, but they are impractical and considered by many to be unethical. 6 More recently, further data have been collected in noncontinuous and/or retrospective, open-label extensions of the IFN RCTs 7-10 ; but in these studies, the protection against bias afforded by randomization was largely lost.11 Moreover, patients enrolled in the placebo arms of RCTs do not represent the natural history of MS because they are selected for having frequent attacks during a set interval before the study....