We previously reported that the combination of two safe proteostasis regulators, cysteamine and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), can be used to improve deficient expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in patients homozygous for the CFTR Phe508del mutation. Here we provide the proof-of-concept that this combination treatment restored CFTR function and reduced lung inflammation (P<0.001) in Phe508del/Phe508del or Phe508del/null-Cftr (but not in Cftr-null mice), provided that such mice were autophagy-competent. Primary nasal cells from patients bearing different class II CFTR mutations, either in homozygous or compound heterozygous form, responded to the treatment in vitro. We assessed individual responses to cysteamine plus EGCG in a single-centre, open-label phase-2 trial. The combination treatment decreased sweat chloride from baseline, increased both CFTR protein and function in nasal cells, restored autophagy in such cells, decreased CXCL8 and TNF-α in the sputum, and tended to improve respiratory function. These positive effects were particularly strong in patients carrying Phe508del CFTR mutations in homozygosity or heterozygosity. However, a fraction of patients bearing other CFTR mutations failed to respond to therapy. Importantly, the same patients whose primary nasal brushed cells did not respond to cysteamine plus EGCG in vitro also exhibited deficient therapeutic responses in vivo. Altogether, these results suggest that the combination treatment of cysteamine plus EGCG acts ‘on-target' because it can only rescue CFTR function when autophagy is functional (in mice) and improves CFTR function when a rescuable protein is expressed (in mice and men). These results should spur the further clinical development of the combination treatment.
Hyaluronic acid combined with hypertonic saline solution may contribute to improved adherence to hypertonic saline therapy. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. Considering the extraordinary versatility of hyaluronic acid in biological reactions, perspective studies could define its applicability to halting progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis.
Background:
Currently, no consensus guidelines recommend routine bronchoscopy procedure in cystic fibrosis (CF), as no evidence is available concerning its use as either a diagnostic or therapeutic tool. Its efficacy is controversial, and no randomized controlled prospective trials are available to check its effectiveness. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the effectiveness of bronchoscopy as a diagnostic/therapeutic tool in CF children and adolescents; and to verify the effect of serial bronchoscopy on lung disease progression in subjects with CF not responding to a single procedure.
Methods:
Data of patients who received bronchoscopy at 2 Italian CF centers were collected. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed during the procedure including airway clearance with mucolytics, inhaled antibiotics, and/or surfactant instillation.
Results:
A total of 16 patients in center 1 and 17 in center 2 underwent, respectively, 28 and 23 bronchoscopic procedure in the study period. Five patients in each center underwent >1 procedure. All procedures were generally well tolerated. No patient required admission to the pediatric intensive therapy unit. In 19.6% of bronchoalveolar lavages, growth of Aspergillus fumigatus was evident, although not detected by sputum analyses. After the procedure, an increase in mean percent predicted forced expiratory volume in the 1 second >10% was observed, and a significant decrease in pulmonary exacerbations yearly was evident.
Conclusion:
Based on the results, we suggest bronchoscopy is not to be considered an obsolete tool, and it remains useful in CF management, although in selected cases. We encourage to support longitudinal observational studies to standardize the procedure, focusing on the choice of drugs to be instilled, modalities and timing of serial bronchoscopy and subsequent follow-up in selected severe clinical conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.