No abstract

Abstract. Proteinuria plays a causal role in the progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). A previous controlled trial showed that steroids are effective in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function in patients with IgAN. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of steroids in IgAN, examine the trend of proteinuria during follow-up (starting from the hypothesis that the degree of reduction in proteinuria may influence IgAN outcome), and evaluate how histologic scores can influence steroid response. A secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 86 adult IgAN patients who were receiving supportive therapy or intravenous methylprednisolone plus oral prednisone for 6 mo was conducted. Ten-year renal survival was significantly better in the steroid than in the control group (97% versus 53%; log rank test P ϭ 0.0003). In the 72 patients who did not reach the end point (doubling in baseline serum creatinine), median proteinuria significantly decreased (1.9 g/24 h at baseline, 1

Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD). The application of convective therapies to the outpatient setting may improve outcomes, including intradialytic hypotension. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, we randomly assigned 146 long-term dialysis patients to HD (n ϭ 70), online predilution hemofiltration (HF; n ϭ 36), or online predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF; n ϭ 40). The primary end point was the frequency of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension (ISH). Compared with the run-in period, the frequency of sessions with ISH during the evaluation period increased for HD (7.1 to 7.9%) and decreased for both HF (9.8 to 8.0%) and HDF (10.6 to 5.2%) (P Ͻ 0.001). Mean predialysis systolic BP increased by 4.2 mmHg among those who were assigned to HDF compared with decreases of 0.6 and 1.8 mmHg among those who were assigned to HD and HF, respectively (P ϭ 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant risk reductions in ISH for both HF (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) and HDF (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.63). There was a trend toward higher dropout for those who were assigned to HF (P ϭ 0.107). In conclusion, compared with conventional HD, convective therapies (HDF and HF) reduce ISH in long-term dialysis patients.

To compare the efficacy (induction of remission) and safety of cyclosporine (CsA) with those of supportive therapy in patients with steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), we organized an open, prospective, randomized, multicentric, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. Forty-five patients with steroid-resistant INS were randomly assigned to supportive therapy or CsA (5 mg/kg/day for adults, 6 mg/kg/day for children) for six months, then tapered off by 25% every two months until complete discontinuation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. During the first year 13/22 CsA-treated patients versus three of 19 controls attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome (P < 0.001). A symptom score was assessed at time 0 and at six months. The mean score significantly decreased in the CsA group (P < 0.001), but remained unchanged in the controls. At month 6 the mean urinary protein excretion, the mean serum proteins and plasma cholesterol had significantly improved in the CsA group but were not changed in the controls. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine and creatinine clearance between treatments (interaction time* treatments, P = 0.089 and P = 0.935, respectively) at month 6 versus basal. The CsA-related side-effects were mild; no significant difference in blood pressure between the two groups was seen at any time. This study shows that CsA can bring about remission in some 60% of patients with steroid-resistant INS. In patients with normal renal function and without severe hypertension, CsA at the therapeutic scheme adopted did not produce severe renal or extrarenal toxicity.

There is not agreement about the best maintenance treatment for patients with diffuse lupus nephritis. This multicenter, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine and azathioprine. Seventy-five patients with diffuse proliferative lupus were given three intravenous methylprednisolone pulses followed by prednisone and oral cyclophosphamide for a median of 90 d. Subsequently, patients were randomly assigned either to cyclosporine or to azathioprine for 2 yr (core study). Treatment continued for up to 4 yr (follow-up study). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of disease flares. Secondary end points were proteinuria per day, creatinine clearance, and adverse effects. Seven flares occurred in the cyclosporine group, and eight occurred in the azathioprine group. At the end of the core study, mean proteinuria decreased from 2.

No abstract

HF has a progressive stabilizing haemodynamic effect, producing a more physiological cardiovascular profile than HD. This long-term effect, observed in stable patients treated under strictly identical conditions, is probably due to the mechanism of convection, and is different from the acute effect observed mainly in unstable patients.

Treatment based on everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine allowed excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 3 years. An early discontinuation of steroids increased the risk of acute rejection, but was associated with a better graft survival in the long-term. However, it was well tolerated only by 54% of patients.