This study examined the psychometric properties of the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5; Weathers, Litz, et al., 2013b) in 2 independent samples of veterans receiving care at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (N = 468). A subsample of these participants (n = 140) was used to define a valid diagnostic cutoff score for the instrument using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Weathers, Blake, et al., 2013) as the reference standard. The PCL-5 test scores demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .96), test-retest reliability (r = .84), and convergent and discriminant validity. Consistent with previous studies (Armour et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014), confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the data were best explained by a 6-factor anhedonia model and a 7-factor hybrid model. Signal detection analyses using the CAPS-5 revealed that PCL-5 scores of 31 to 33 were optimally efficient for diagnosing PTSD (κ(.5) = .58). Overall, the findings suggest that the PCL-5 is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used effectively with veterans. Further, by determining a valid cutoff score using the CAPS-5, the PCL-5 can now be used to identify veterans with probable PTSD. However, findings also suggest the need for research to evaluate cluster structure of DSM-5. (PsycINFO Database Record

Abstract-In 2010, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Defense (DOD) jointly published the revised VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Posttraumatic Stress. The Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) provides evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating a spectrum of stress-related disorders. Included in the CPG were recommendations for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other stress disorder-related functional impairment. This article complements those CPG recommendations by providing information that may further guide clinicians in the assessment of functional impairment related to PTSD and other stress-related disorders. We briefly review some of the empirical literature on the association between PTSD and functional impairment and some of the more frequently used methods and measures for assessing functional impairment and introduce a new measure currently being developed by our group. We suggest that information obtained via patient self-report and/or clinician rating be supplemented whenever possible with collateral data from friends, family members, coworkers, or supervisors to provide a complete picture of current and premorbid functional status. Finally, we explore several important issues that we encourage clinicians to keep in mind when assessing functional impairment among Veterans and Active Duty servicemembers.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; PT074941, "Development and validation of a PTSD-related functional impairment scale;" http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) is an 18-item symptom checklist used as a brief distress screening in cancer and other medical patients. This study evaluated the validity of the BSI-18 in a sample of 221 adult survivors of childhood cancers ages 18-55 (median = 26). Validity of the BSI-18 was compared to the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Results indicated the BSI-18 scales had acceptable internal consistency (alpha >0.80) and were highly correlated with the corresponding SCL-90-R subscales (correlations from 0.88 to 0.94). When subjects were classified as case positive (significantly distressed) using the BSI-18 manual case-rule, classification agreement with the SCL-90-R was poor as evidenced by low sensitivity (41.78%). An alternative BSI-18 case-rule previously developed for cancer patients using the General Severity Index (GSI; GSI t-score >or=57) demonstrated better sensitivity (83.54%). ROC analysis indicated the BSI-18 had strong diagnostic utility relative to the SCL-90-R (AUC = 0.98) and several possible GSI cut-off scores were evaluated. The optimal cut-of score was a t-score >or=50 which had a sensitivity of 97.47% and a specificity of 85.21%. Results support use of the BSI-18 with adult survivors of childhood cancer but indicate an alternative case-rule must be used.

This study describes the three-phase development and validation of the Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF), an 80-item, self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related psychosocial functional impairment. In Phase I, we conducted 12 focus groups with male and female veterans (n = 53) to identify and operationalize the domains of psychosocial impairment associated with PTSD. This information was used to develop the IPF. We subsequently evaluated the psychometric properties of the newly developed inventory in Phases II (n = 276) and III (n = 368) using two independent samples of veterans. We found that the overall IPF score demonstrated stronger correlations with measures of mental health-related impairment (all rs > |.39|; all ps < .05) and weaker correlations with measures of physical health-related impairment (all rs < |.29|; all ps < .05). Overall IPF scores were most strongly associated with PTSD and other disorders associated with the anxious-misery factor of the three-factor model of psychiatric comorbidity (all rs > .56; all ps < .05) and less strongly associated with disorders associated with the fear factor (all rs < .48; all ps < .05) and the externalizing factor (r = .16; p < .05). The IPF demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (r = .77; p < .05). Our results suggest that the IPF is a valid and reliable measure of PTSD-related psychosocial functional impairment. (PsycINFO Database Record

This paper describes the process for and safety/feasibility of adapting the Beardslee Preventive Intervention Program for Depression for use with predominantly low income, Latino families. Utilizing a Stage I model for protocol development, the adaptation involved literature review, focus groups, pilot testing of the adapted manual, and open trial of the adapted intervention with 9 families experiencing maternal depression. Adaptations included conducting the intervention in either Spanish or English, expanding the intervention to include the contextual experience of Latino families in the United States with special attention to cultural metaphors, and using a strength-based, family-centered approach. The families completed preintervention measures for maternal depression, child behavioral difficulties, global functioning, life stresses, and an interview that included questions about acculturative stressors, resiliency, and family awareness of parental depression. The postintervention interview focused on satisfaction, distress, benefits of the adapted intervention, and therapeutic alliance. The results revealed that the adaptation was nonstressful, perceived as helpful by family members, had effects that seem to be similar to the original intervention, and the preventionists could maintain fidelity to the revised manual. The therapeutic alliance with the preventionists was experienced as quite positive by the mothers. A case example illustrates how the intervention was adapted.

This study validated the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (B-IPF), an abridged version of the 80-item Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF; Bovin et al., 2018). The B-IPF—a 7-item self-report questionnaire that assesses posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)–related psychosocial functional impairment—was developed for use in settings in which the full IPF would be too time intensive to administer. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the B-IPF among a sample of 362 veterans recruited from 2 Veterans Affairs hospitals. The B-IPF demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .84) and adequate test-retest reliability (r = .65, p < .001). The B-IPF was strongly correlated with the IPF (r = .71, p < .01) and had higher correlations with measures of mental health impairment and quality of life (all rs > ∥.50∥; all ps < .001) than with a measure of physical health impairment (i.e., the Physical Component Summary; r = −.34; p < .001), which demonstrated strong construct validity. In addition, the B-IPF displayed strong criterion-related validity, with higher correlations with a PTSD symptom measure, (r = .63, p < .05), and measures of other internalizing disorders (all rs > .44; all ps < .05) and a lower correlation with a measure of an externalizing disorder (r = .14; p < .05). These results indicate that the B-IPF is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing PTSD-related impairment. The strong psychometric properties of the instrument, in addition to its length, make it ideal for settings in which time is a factor.

No abstract

No abstract