For survivors of severe COVID-19 disease, having defeated the virus is just the beginning of an uncharted recovery path. What follows after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection depends on the extension and severity of viral attacks in different cell types and organs. Despite the ridiculously large number of papers that have flooded scientific journals and preprinthosting websites, a clear clinical picture of COVID-19 aftermath is vague at best. Without larger prospective observational studies that are only now being started, clinicians can retrieve information just from case reports and or small studies. This is the time to understand how COVID-19 goes forward and what consequences survivors may expect to experience. To this aim, a multidisciplinary post-acute care service involving several specialists has been established at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS (Rome, Italy). Although COVID-19 is an infectious disease primarily affecting the lung, its multi-organ involvement requires an interdisciplinary approach encompassing virtually all branches of internal medicine and geriatrics. In particular, during the post-acute phase, the geriatrician may serve as the case manager of a multidisciplinary team. The aim of this article is to describe the importance of the interdisciplinary approach-coordinated by geriatrician-to cope the potential post-acute care needs of recovered COVID-19 patients.

Due to the low diagnostic capability of clinical variables, PCR amplifications in CSF, especially for EBV-DNA and for JCV-DNA, represent, in most cases, an essential step in the differential diagnosis of AIDS-related FBL. This is particularly true in patients with FBL without mass effect or with mass effect and who are either seronegative or undergoing anti-Toxoplasma prophylaxis. Brain biopsy remains a necessary procedure in EBV-DNA-positive cases and in seronegative patients with FBL displaying a mass effect. Positive JCV-DNA testing may obviate the need for brain biopsy in patients with FBL without mass effect. An advanced diagnostic strategy based on combined clinical criteria and PCR tests may allow rapid and accurate identification of patients for prompt brain biopsy or specific therapy.

We analyzed the bacterial communities of the nasopharynx in 40 SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected patients. All infected patients had a mild COVID-19 disease. We did not find statistically significant differences in either bacterial richness and diversity or composition. These findings suggest a nasopharyngeal microbiota at least early resilient to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Since its first description, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide with over 2 million cases reported and thousands of deaths. Every human is susceptible to the infection, and pregnant women are not spared. Although reports documented COVID-19 infections among pregnant women 1,2 and described the neonatal outcome relatively to early days of life, 3 to date, no information on late-onset infection in newborns to mother with SARS-CoV-2 contracted in pregnancy are available. AbstractObjective To date, no information on late-onset infection in newborns to mother with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) contracted in pregnancy are available. This study aimed to evaluate postdischarge SARS-CoV-2 status of newborns to mothers with COVID-19 in pregnancy that, at birth, were negative to SARS-CoV-2. Study Design This is an observational study of neonates born to mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 .Results Seven pregnant women with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection have been evaluated in our institution. One woman had a spontaneous abortion at 8 weeks of gestational age, four women recovered and are still in follow-up, and two women delivered. Two newborns were enrolled in the study. At birth and 3 days of life, newborns were negative to SARS-CoV-2. At 2-week follow-up, one newborn tested positive although asymptomatic. Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of follow-up of newborns to mothers with COVID-19 in pregnancy, since they remain at risk of contracting the infection in the early period of life and long-term consequences are still unknown.

Sample date Result (cycle threshold per target) Gestational age on admission 34 weeks, 4 days 37 weeks, 3 days

No abstract

Infection with high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical cancer. However, relatively few infections progress to malignant disease. Progression to malignancy requires the overexpression of the E6 and E7 genes in the integrated HPV genome. It follows that the E6 and E7 transcripts could be useful markers of disease progression. The study presented here tests this possibility, using data from colposcopy and from cytological and histological tests to compare RNA assays for the E6 and E7 genes with DNA testing. A total of 180 women underwent colposcopy, cytology, and biopsy of suspected lesions (143 cases). Cervical brush specimens were analyzed for HPV DNA and for E6 and E7 mRNA. DNA from HR HPV was found in 57.8% of the specimens; E6 and E7 transcripts were found in 45%. The rates of detection of HPV DNA and of E6 and E7 transcripts were 33.3% and 25%, respectively, for specimens with normal findings; 51.4% and 31.9%, respectively, for specimens with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1); and 61.1% and 44.2% for specimens with CIN2, respectively. All specimens with CIN3 and 95.5% of specimens from patients with squamous cell carcinoma were positive by both assays. Thirty-seven patients with normal colposcopy findings did not undergo biopsy. HPV DNA and mRNA transcripts were found in 32.4% and 18.9% of these cases, respectively. Comparisons with cytological tests produced similar results. Overall, the mRNA tests showed a higher specificity than the DNA tests for high-grade lesions (72.7% and 56.2%, respectively) and a higher positive predictive value (59.3% and 49.0%, respectively). These findings suggest that mRNA assays could be more powerful than DNA testing for predicting the risk of progression and offer a strong potential as a tool for triage and patient follow-up.Carcinomas of the anogenital tract, particularly cancer of the cervix, represent the second most frequent type of neoplasm worldwide (43, 57). The major cause of these cancers is infection with high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV). DNA from HPV has been detected in more than 99% of cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and a smaller proportion of adenocarcinomas (3,4,31,33). However, most HPV infections regress spontaneously or progress only after a long period of latency. As a result, the number of infections is far higher than the number of women who develop cancer.The most common types of HPV found in cancer patients are types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 (5, 10, 40, 53). Persistent infection with these types is regarded as a significant risk factor (40). The role of HPVs in the etiology of cervical cancer is tightly correlated with the overexpression of two oncogenes (E6 and E7) due to a specific opening in the E2 open reading frame in the integrated viral genome (23, 28). Studies of cervical cancer cell lines and cancer biopsy specimens have shown that the continuous expression of the genes is a necessary condition for the transformation and maintenance of neoplastic and dysplastic cells (46,56,57).Ce...

This study investigates the prevalence of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection in kidney transplant patients, evaluating the risk of HHV-8 transmission via transplantation and the association between pre-and posttransplantation HHV-8 infection and the subsequent development of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Immunofluorescence and an enzyme immunoassay were used to determine HHV-8 seroprevalence in 175 patients awaiting kidney transplantation and 215 controls who were attending our clinic for other reasons. All patients in the study came from central or southern Italy. Seroprevalence was similar in both groups (14.8 versus 14.9%), with no significant difference between the rates for male and female patients. Of the 175 patients, 100 were tested for anti-HHV-8 antibodies at various times during follow-up. During follow-up, seroprevalence increased from 12% on the date of transplantation to 26%. This increase was paralleled by an age-related increase in seroprevalence in the control group. During follow-up from 3 months to 10 years after transplantation, KS was diagnosed in seven patients (4.0%). Six of these patients were positive for HHV-8 prior to transplantation. Overall, 23.0% of patients who were HHV-8 positive before transplantation developed KS, whereas only 0.7% of seronegative patients developed the disease (relative risk, 34.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.31 to 274.0). This finding suggests that the key risk factor for KS is infection prior to transplantation and that antibody detection in patients awaiting transplantation could be useful in identifying patients at high risk for KS. In patients from geographic areas with a high prevalence of HHV-8, serological tests on donors may be less important.