The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical features, prognostic factors, and efficacy of treatments in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with a leukemic presentation at onset of the disease. In order to do this, a retrospective multicenter study was performed from 2005-2011 in 28 Italian hematology divisions in which 43 cases were collected. Forty-one patients received an induction therapy, consisting of an acute myeloid leukemia-type regimen in 26 patients (60%) and acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type regimen in 15 patients (35%). Six patients (14%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Seventeen patients (41%) achieved a complete remission: seven after acute myeloid leukemia-type treatment and 10 after an acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type regimen, with a significant advantage for acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy (P=0.02). Relapse occurred in six of the 17 patients (35%) who achieved complete remission, more frequently after acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 8.7 months (range, 0.2-32.9). The patients treated with an acute myeloid leukemia-type regimen had an overall survival of 7.1 months (range, 0.2-19.5), whereas that of the patients receiving acute lymphoid leukemia/lymphoma-type chemotherapy was 12.3 months (range, 1-32.9) (P=0.02). The median overall survival of the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients was 22.7 months (range, 12-32.9), and these patients had a significant survival advantage compared to the non-transplanted patients (median 7.1 months, 0.2-21.3; P=0.03). In conclusion, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with bone-marrow involvement is an aggressive subtype of high-risk acute leukemia. The rarity of this disease does not enable prospective clinical trials to identify the better therapeutic strategy, which, at present, is based on clinicians' experience. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: an Italian multicenter study

Associazione QOL-ONE.

No abstract

Summary:The factors possibly affecting the collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were evaluated in 104 de novo acute leukemia patients (66 myeloid and 38 lymphoblastic leukemias) in first cytological complete remission (CR); all patients achieved CR after first-line induction chemotherapy. The acute myeloid leukemia patients (AML) were given consolidation-mobilization chemotherapy with cytarabine, and daunoblastin or mitoxantrone or idarubicin; the acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients (ALL) were given consolidation-mobilization chemotherapy with cytarabine and etoposide. In all patients, the collection of PBSC was performed during recovery after giving consolidation chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Two main groups were considered according to the CD34 þ cells  10 6 /kg b.w. collected, that is, poor mobilizers (PM), with a collection of o2  10 6 /kg and good mobilizers, with a collection of 42  10 6 /kg. Of 104 patients, 27 (25.9%) were PM; 20/27 had AML and 7/27 had ALL. At multivariate analysis, a lower CD34 þ cells count premobilization chemotherapy (CD34 steady state), the presence of FUO (fever of unknown origin) or infection, and a lower number of CD34 þ cells on the first day of collection correlated with poor mobilization. These results may enable early recognition of patients who may have poor mobilization, and aid selection of patients for different mobilization regimens.

The breakpoint cluster region-abelson 1 p190 fusion transcript is the most frequent variant observed in Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Qualitative-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR are the currently used methods to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) in Ph+ ALL patients; for the latter, full standardization and an international quality validation are lacking. Here, we developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for MRD monitoring in p190+ ALL cases. The analytical performance was assessed by the limit-of-detection determination, showing a reliability, sensitivity, and precision of the assay of up to 0.001%. Comparison of results obtained with qualitative PCR and ddPCR in 117 follow-up samples from 16 of 26 Ph+ ALL patients showed discordant results in 27% of cases (32 of 117). Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of 19 ddPCR-positive samples with a low tumor burden failed to provide quantitative results in 63% of cases (12 of 19). These results highlight that in p190+ ALL the ddPCR method has a sufficient analytical performance for very low MRD monitoring and for predicting molecular relapse several months before hematologic relapse. In conclusion, MRD monitoring by ddPCR may better stratify Ph+ ALL patients at risk of disease progression.