Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the pathogenesis of depression and in the antidepressant response to SSRIs. A functional new variant in the promoter region of the 5-HT1A gene was recently reported (-1019 C>G). The aim of this study is to investigate a possible association between this 5-HT1A receptor variant and antidepressant response to fluvoxamine in a sample of 262 mood-disorder subjects (151 major depressed and 111 bipolars) treated with fluvoxamine for 6 wk. The severity of depressive symptoms was assessed weekly with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). 5-HT1A variants did not influence antidepressant response in the whole sample and in unipolar subjects. In bipolars, 5-HT1A*C/C genotype carriers showed a better response to fluvoxamine (p=0.036), independently from clinical variables. The 5-HT1A polymorphism effect on antidepressant response was independent from the previously reported effect of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism. In conclusion, 5-HT1A variants could influence the antidepressant efficacy in bipolar subjects, even if results must be verified on larger samples.
The introduction of selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has significantly improved the pharmacological treatment of a range of psychiatric disorders. Nevertheless, despite the undoubted advantages of antidepressant treatment in terms of improved tolerability to therapy while maintaining a high level of efficacy, not all patients benefit from it; an appreciable proportion do not respond adequately, while others may show adverse reactions. The necessary change of the initial treatment choice often requires extended periods for the remission of symptomatology. Such difficulties could be avoided if it should be possible to determine more quickly the most suitable drug. Several factors have been thought to influence the outcome of antidepressant therapy. Among the factors influencing the interindividual variability in response to treatment with SSRI, differences in genetic features may play a significant role. Several genetic polymorphisms have been associated with therapeutic SSRI response, including genetic variants of the 5-HT transporter, 5-HT-2A-receptor, tryptophan hydroxylase, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, G-protein beta3 subunit, interleukin-1beta and angiotensin-converting enzyme, although with conflicting results; also cytochrome P450 drug-metabolising enzymes may bear a particular importance, although further corroboration of the findings is necessary, and further key participating genes remain to be identified. The hope is that the identification of these genetic components will eventually facilitate the development of a customised SSRI treatment. 1 These drugs show high efficacy, and relatively few adverse reactions compared with the previously used tricyclic antidepressants, even though their mechanism of action is not entirely understood yet. However, these drugs are effective in only about two-thirds of depressed patients.2 The necessary change of the initial treatment choice often requires extended periods for the remission of symptomatology. Such difficulties could be avoided if it would be possible to determine more quickly the most suitable drug for each subject. Several factors have been thought to influence the outcome of antidepressant therapy and efficient clinical predictors have not been yet identified, but there is some evidence suggesting that genetic factors play a substantial role.
The pharmacological treatment of mood disorders has reduced their morbidity and improved mental health for millions of individuals worldwide, favouring a considerable reduction of the direct and indirect costs caused by these common pathologies. Unfortunately, not all individuals benefit, and 30-40% of patients do not show a complete response to treatment. Efficient clinical predictors are not available, although genetic factors are thought to play a substantial (but complex) role in the antidepressant response. Pharmacogenetics, which investigates the influence of genetic features on the pharmacological response, has gained increasing attention and holds great promise for clinical psychiatry. Here, a brief overview is provided on the various pharmacogenetic studies published to date that analyse the commonest treatments for depression: antidepressants, sleep deprivation and lithium salts.
We reported an independent association of the short variant of the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (SERTPR) and tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) genes with antidepressant response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The aim of the present study was to confirm the effect of the SERTPR and TPH gene variants on the SSRIs antidepressant activity in a new sample of major and bipolar depressives. Two hundred and twenty one inpatients (major depressives = 128, bipolar disorder = 93) were treated with SSRIs (fluvoxamine or paroxetine) for 6 weeks; the severity of depressive symptoms was weekly assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). SERTPR and TPH variants were determined using PCR-based techniques, 220 subjects genotyped for SERTPR and 221 for TPH that were never included in previous studies. SERTPR*s/s variant association with a poor response to SSRI treatment was confirmed, even if with less significant P values (P = 0.034), independently from clinical variables; pooling the present sample with previous ones we observed a highly significant effect (P < 0.000001). TPH*A/A variants showed higher HAMD scores throughout the trial but with only a trend in the same direction of our previous study in terms of a worse response of A/A genotypes. Thus, the previous positive association was not fully replicated for TPH. The present independent replication confirms SERTPR variants as a liability factor for antidepressant efficacy while the TPH effect is not unequivocal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.