Ameloblastoma is a slow-growing, persistent and locally aggressive neoplasm of epithelial origin accounting for 10% out of 30% of all odontogenic tumors. According to the World Health Organization, ameloblastomas are classified into the following types: conventional, unicystic, and peripheral. Unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) refers to those cystic lesions that show clinical, radiographic, or gross features of a mandibular cyst, but on histologic examination show a typical ameloblastomatous epithelium lining part of the cyst cavity, with or without luminal and/or mural tumor growth. We report a case of young female with a radiolucent lesion in the right posterior mandible. Surgical removal of the lesion was performed, with differential diagnosis of a radicular cyst. However, histopathologic examination revealed UA. The patient was kept under observation and showed signs of local bone regeneration. The purpose of presenting this report of a clinical case of UA previously misdiagnosed as radicular cyst is to emphasize the significance of histopathologic examination of all tissue specimens recovered in surgery even when clinical and radiological finding are innocuous.

The patients have completed a follow-up of 24 to 64 months (median, 38.5 months). Of the 44 patients, 12 had bilateral involvement. Trauma in childhood was, expectedly, the most frequent etiologic factor. Gap arthroplasty was the most frequently employed technique, followed by the use of autologous tissue interposition. The temporalis muscle-fascia and the temporalis fascia alone, as well as the auricular cartilage, were employed most frequently. Complete alloplastic condylar replacement was performed in one patient, who, unfortunately, returned with pain, clicking, and deviation of the jaw, necessitating removal within 1 month. Total joint replacement was abandoned after this case. We outline our protocol for the management of this disabling condition.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant in refractory glaucomas in Indian eyes. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted on the charts of 122 eyes of 122 patients with refractory glaucoma treated with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant placement at Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi between January 1996 and December 1999. The main outcome measure was success at the last follow-up. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 22 mmHg or less and 5 mmHg or more and at least a 30% reduction in IOP without visually devastating complications or additional glaucoma surgery. Results The mean postoperative IOP (17.2973.79 mmHg) was significantly (Po0.001) lower than the mean preoperative IOP (31.4777.86 mmHg) at last follow up (mean 12.5178.37 months; range 3-24 months). The cumulative probability of success by Kaplan -Meier analysis was 85.95% at 12 months and 82.83% at 24 months. The mean number of postoperative antiglaucoma medications (0.7570.80) was also significantly lower (Po0.001) than the mean preoperative number of antiglaucoma medications (2.83 þ 0.72). The most common complication was corneal-tube contact, which occurred in five (4.10%) eyes. Retinal detachment occurred postoperatively in one eye with the clinical diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma secondary to Eale's disease. Two patients had tube extrusion requiring repositioning and reinforcement with scleral patch graft. Conclusions Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation is an effective and relatively safe therapy for the treatment of refractory glaucoma in Indians.

Osteomyelitis is defined as inflammation of the medullary cavities, haversian system and adjacent cortex of bone. Osteomyelitis involving maxilla is quite rare when compared to that of mandible. Fungal osteomyelitis is very rarely seen and documented in the maxillofacial area. It is devastating to patients if it is invasive in nature. A prospective study was undertaken from December 2011 to December 2013. Biopsied hard tissue bits were decalcified and sections were stained with H&E, periodic acid Schiff and Grocott methenamine silver. Culture sensitivity was carried out in all cases. Surgical intervention followed by antifungal therapy was advocated to treat the patients. The current series showed five cases of fungal osteomyelitis which included candidal osteomyelitis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis with slight predominance of maxilla over mandible. Osteomyelitis of facial bones needs to be investigated thoroughly as there is no difference in clinical presentation between bacterial and fungal osteomyelitis. The diagnostic workup with biopsy and culture sensitivity helps to identify the pathogen at the earliest. Appropriate antifungal treatment needs to be advocated for successful treatment.

No abstract