No abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins maintain transcriptional repression of hundreds of genes involved in development, signaling or cancer using chromatin-based epigenetic mechanisms. Biochemical studies in Drosophila have revealed that PcG proteins associate in at least two classes of protein complexes known as Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2). Drosophila core PRC1 is composed of four subunits, Polycomb (Pc), Sex combs extra (Sce), Polyhomeotic (Ph), and Posterior sex combs (Psc). Each of these proteins has multiple orthologs in vertebrates classified respectively as the CBX, RING1/RNF2, PHC, and BMI1/PCGF families. Mammalian genomes encode five CBX family members (CBX2, CBX4, CBX6, CBX7, and CBX8) that are believed to have distinct biological functions. Here, we applied a tandem affinity purification (TAP) approach coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methodologies in order to identify interacting partners of CBX family proteins under the same experimental conditions. Our analysis identified with high confidence about 20 proteins co-eluted with CBX2 and CBX7 tagged proteins, about 40 with CBX4, and around 60 with CBX6 and CBX8. We provide evidences that the CBX family proteins are mutually exclusive and define distinct PRC1-like protein complexes. CBX proteins also interact with different efficiencies with the other PRC1 components. Among the novel CBX interacting partners, protein kinase 2 associates with all CBX-PRC1 protein complexes, whereas 14-3-3 proteins specifically bind to CBX4. 14-3-3 protein binding to CBX4 appears to modulate the interaction between CBX4 and the BMI1/ PCGF components of PRC1, but has no effect on CBX4-RING1/RNF2 interaction. Finally, we suggest that differences in CBX protein interactions would account, at least in part, for distinct subnuclear localization of the CBX family members. Molecular & Cellular

Identification of protein-protein interactions is crucial for unraveling cellular processes and biochemical mechanisms of signal transduction. Here we describe, for the first time, the application of the tandem affinity purification (TAP) and LC-MS method to the characterization of protein complexes from transgenic mice. The TAP strategy developed in transgenic mice allows the emplacement of complexes in their physiological environment in contact with proteins that might only be specifically expressed in certain tissues while simultaneously ensuring the right stoichiometry of the TAP protein versus their binding partners and represents a novelty in proteomics approaches used so far. Mouse lines expressing TAPtagged 14-3-3 protein were generated, and protein interactions were determined. 14-3-3 proteins are general regulators of cell signaling and represent up to 1% of the total brain protein. This study allowed the identification of almost 40 novel 14-3-3-binding proteins. Biochemical and functional characterization of some of these interactions revealed new mechanisms of action of 14-3-3 in several signaling pathways, such as glutamate receptor signaling via binding to homer homolog 3 (Homer 3) and in cytoskeletal rearrangements and spine morphogenesis by binding and regulating the activity of the signaling complex formed by G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interactor

No abstract

Background: Histone lysine methylation plays a fundamental role in chromatin organization and marks distinct chromatin regions. In particular, trimethylation at lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9) and at lysine 20 of histone H4 (H4K20) governed by the histone methyltransferases SUV39H1/2 and SUV420H1/2 respectively, have emerged as a hallmark of pericentric heterochromatin. Controlled chromatin organization is crucial for gene expression regulation and genome stability. Therefore, it is essential to analyze mechanisms responsible for high order chromatin packing and in particular the interplay between enzymes involved in histone modifications, such as histone methyltransferases and proteins that recognize these epigenetic marks.

A small molecule inhibitor of NF-B-dependent cytokine expression was discovered that blocked tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ␣-induced IB␣ degradation in MM6 cells but not the degradation of ␤-catenin in Jurkat cells. Ro106-9920 blocked lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-dependent expression of TNF␣, interleukin-1␤, and interleukin-6 in fresh human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with IC 50 values below 1 M. Ro106-9920 also blocked TNF␣ production in a dose-dependent manner following oral administration in two acute models of inflammation (air pouch and LPS challenge). Ro106-9920 was observed to inhibit an ubiquitination activity that does not require ␤TRCP but associates with IB␣ and will ubiquitinate IB␣ S32E,S36E (IB␣ee) specifically at lysine 21 or 22. Ro106-9920 was identified in a cell-free system as a time-dependent inhibitor of IB␣ee ubiquitination with an IC 50 value of 2.3 ؎ 0.09 M. The ubiquitin E3 ligase activity is inhibited by cysteine-alkylating reagents, supported by E2UBCH7, and requires cIAP2 or a cIAP2-associated protein for activity. These activities are inconsistent with what has been reported for SCF ␤TRCP , the putative E3 for IB␣ ubiquitination. Ro106-9920 was observed to be selective for IB␣ee ubiquitination over the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), E2UBCH7, nonspecific ubiquitination of cellular proteins, and 97 other molecular targets. We propose that Ro106-9920 selectively inhibits an uncharacterized but essential ubiquitination activity associated with LPSand TNF␣-induced IB␣ degradation and NF-B activation.

No abstract

Most cellular processes are carried out by a multitude of proteins that assemble into multimeric complexes. Thus a precise understanding of the biological pathways that control cellular events relies on the identification and on the biochemical characterization of the proteins involved in such multimeric assemblies. Advances in MS have made possible the identification of multisubunit protein complexes isolated from cell lysates with high sensitivity and accuracy, whereas the TAP (tandem affinity purification) methodology efficiently isolates native protein complexes from cells for proteomics analysis. TAP is a generic method based on the sequential utilization of two affinity tags to purify protein assemblies. During the first purification step, the Protein A moiety of the TAP tag is bound to IgG beads, and protein components associated with the TAP-tagged protein are retrieved by TEV (tobacco etch virus) protease cleavage. This enzyme is a sequence-specific protease cleaving a seven-amino-acid recognition site located between the first and second tags. In the second affinity step, the protein complex is immobilized to calmodulin-coated beads via the CBP (calmodulin-binding peptide) of the TAP tag. The CBP-calmodulin interaction is calcium-dependent and calcium-chelating agents are used in the second elution step to release the final protein complex preparation used for protein identification by MS. The TAP-MS approach has proven to efficiently permit the characterization of protein complexes from bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells, as well as from multicellular organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila and mice.