Objective. Due to the high prevalence of prescription opioid misuse, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) requiring manufacturers of extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics to fund continuing education based on a FDA Blueprint. This article describes the Safe and Competent Opioid Prescribing Education (SCOPE of Pain) program, an ER/LA opioid analgesic REMS program, and its impact on clinician knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and self-reported clinical practice.Method. Participants of the 3-h SCOPE of Pain training completed pre-, immediate post- and 2-month post-assessments.Subjects. The primary target group (n = 2,850), and a subset (n = 476) who completed a 2-month post-assessment, consisted of clinicians licensed to prescribe ER/LA opioid analgesics, who care for patients with chronic pain and who completed the 3-h training between February 28, 2013 and June 13, 2014.Results. Immediately post-program, there was a significant increase in correct responses to knowledge questions (60% to 84%, P ≤ 0.02) and 87% of participants planned to make practice changes. At 2-months post-program, there continued to be a significant increase in correct responses to knowledge questions (60% to 69%, P ≤ 0.03) and 67% reported increased confidence in applying safe opioid prescribing care and 86% reported implementing practice changes. There was also an improvement in alignment of desired attitudes toward safe opioid prescribing.Conclusions. The SCOPE of Pain program improved knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and self-reported clinical practice in safe opioid prescribing. This national REMS program holds potential to improve the safe use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain.
Physician knowledge, opinions, subjective perception of child happiness, and regional factors, all influence physicians' practices and the shared decision-making process. Parents may not be informed or offered all the services available to their child. Knowledge translation initiatives are needed to enhance SMA1 care. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:662-668. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Background: Cerebral palsy is the most common cause of childhood physical disability, with multiple associated comorbidities. Administrative claims data provide population-level prevalence estimates for cerebral palsy surveillance; however, their diagnostic accuracy has never been validated in Quebec. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of administrative claims data for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with cerebral palsy born between 1999 and 2002 within 6 health administrative regions of Quebec. Provincial cerebral palsy registry data (reference standard) and administrative physician claims were linked. We explored differences between true-positive and false-negative cases using subgroup sensitivity analysis.Results: A total of 301 children were identified with confirmed cerebral palsy from the provincial registry, for an estimated prevalence of 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.1) per 1000 children 5 years of age. The sensitivity and specificity of administrative claims data for cerebral palsy were 65.5% (95% CI 59.8%-70.8%) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.9%-99.9%), respectively, yielding a prevalence of 2.0 (95% CI 1.9-2.3) per 1000 children 5 years of age. The positive and negative predictive values were 58.8% (95% CI 53.3%-64.1%) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.9%-99.9%), respectively. The κ value was 0.62 (95% CI 0.57-0.67). Administrative claims data were more sensitive for children from rural regions, born preterm, with spastic quadriparesis and with higher levels of motor impairment.Interpretation: Administrative claims data do not capture the full spectrum of children with cerebral palsy. This suggests the need for a more sensitive case definition and caution when using such data without validation. AbstractResearch Research CMAJ OPENCMAJ OPEN, 5(3) E571 bursement mechanisms. 6 These databases are not without their limitations, including potential inaccuracy in diagnostic code entry that may reflect biases in recall, multiple entries from varying sources, a lack of clear, universally accepted case definitions and "diagnostic undershadowing," wherein only 1 diagnosis is entered for a child with multiple comorbidities. Such databases do have potential advantages related to a large sampling frame (population), lower costs associated with a lack of direct additional patient contact and assessment for case ascertainment, and the ability to obtain records over a longitudinal time frame from multiple sources. This convenience has been translated into a preference for using such administrative databases for surveillance and health outcomes research. Indeed, validated case definitions have been developed and applied to a number of conditions, such as asthma, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to identify cohorts of affected people. 7-9The validity of diagnostic codes for cerebral palsy used in administrative databases has not yet been established. As data from health administrative databases can potentially influence the formulation of hea...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.