No abstract

Six pigs were used to evaluate the influence of three separate modalities on contaminated wounds. Full-thickness skin wounds on the abdomen were contaminated with 10(4) or 10(5) Staphylococcus aureus and then closed with one of three methods. The three closure modalities included (1) a new absorbable staple (Insorb) placed in the subcuticular tissue, (2) a braided Vicryl suture, and (3) percutaneous metal staples. Any foreign body material implanted in tissue increases the risk of infection at that site. Wound closure always involves the use of a foreign body. Historically, sutures have been the primary material used to close tissue. The newer synthetic sutures are significangly more biodegradable and cause less infection than sutures composed of protein, such as silk and catgut. Metal staples are also associated with a low risk of infection. Recently, Incisive Surgical, Inc. (Plymouth, Minnesota) has developed an absorbable polymer staple specifically for subcuticular skin closure. The purpose of this study was to compare the new Insorb staple to both an absorbable polymer suture and a metal staple. Wound infection was assessed 7 days after closure by clinical signs and quantitative bacterial swabs. The results demonstrated that wounds closed with Insorb staples had the lowest incidence (33%) of infection, followed by percutaneous metal staples (44%). All wounds (100%) closed with Vicryl suture became infected. The incidence of wound infection directly correlated with the level of quantitative bacterial count at analysis. The Insorb staple was associated with significantly reduced closure time, less inflammation and infection, and better aesthetic result compared to Vicryl. Compared to metal staples, the Insorb subcuticular staplers demonstrated comparable closure time without the need for later staple removal. In conclusion, the closure of contaminated wounds with the Insorb staples is a superior choice to Vicryl suture because they have a significantly (p = 0.009) lower incidence of infection. The Insorb staple is a revolutionary advance in subcuticular skin stapling.

The repair of peripheral nerves with sutures is time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and functional outcome of repairing nerves with octyl 2-cyanoacrylate adhesive. The right peroneal nerve of 64 male, Lewis rats was sectioned and repaired. The rats were randomized into 3 experimental groups: A (n = 27), using only octyl 2-cyanoacrylate; B (n = 27), using 4, 10-0 nylon sutures; and C (n = 10), a sham operation. The recovery of nerve function was quantified through walking-track analyses; group A showed faster return of nerve function than B, especially at 15 days (P < 0.017). Histologic analysis showed a greater axonal regeneration in group A versus group B and no indication of tissue toxicity in group A. No dehiscence occurred during the 6-month study. Use of adhesive shortened the anastomosis time from 12 minutes to 4 minutes. These results indicate that the use of octyl 2-cyanoacrylate adhesive for nerve anastomoses is safe and effective and may have benefits compared with the use of sutures.

Eliciting the views of persons who have undergone significant medical events is a necessary step in rigorous clinical trial development aimed at testing the efficacy of CAM modalities for symptom management. Consideration of patient preferences and motivations may ensure the best fit between interventions and the desired outcomes.

Wound infection is a threatening, troublesome, and costly complication contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. The methods and materials used to close a wound significantly influence the quality of the repair process and the risk of surgical site infection. Six pigs were used to evaluate the influence of four separate skin-closure modalities on the potentiation of infection in contaminated wounds. Full-thickness skin wounds on the abdomen were contaminated with S. aureus and then closed with one of four devices: a novel absorbable staple (InsorbTM) placed in the subcuticular tissue; a braided absorbable suture (VicrylTM); a monofilament absorbable suture (MonocrylTM); percutaneous metal staples. Wound infection was assessed 7 days after closure by clinical signs and quantitative bacterial swabs. InsorbTM staples had significantly lower infection rates than continuous VicrylTM (39% vs. 100%, p=0.002) or MonocrylTM suture (39% vs. 89%, p=0.014). The InsorbTM subcuticular staple and the metal percutaneous skin staple were statistically equivalent in wound infection rate and parameters of inflammation. The combined data for both interrupted staple modalities documented less inflammation compared to the combined data for continuous sutures. These lower levels of inflammatory metrics were statistically significant for edema (p=0.018), gauze exudate observed (p=0.007) and purulent exudate in wound (p<0.0001). In conclusion, InsorbTM staples were shown to be an acceptable choice for the closure of contaminated wounds because they had a significantly lower incidence of wound infection and inflammation when compared to continuous intradermal suture.