No abstract

No abstract

Background During pregnancy, physiological changes occur from conception to birth. We assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout pregnancy and postpartum using the EQ-5D-5L. Methods Between May and July 2021 (wave 1) and December 2021 and April 2022 (wave 2), we conducted a series of cross-sectional, national online surveys of 5250 pregnant and postpartum United States (US) adults. The survey included the EQ-5D-5L, EQ visual analog scale (EQ VAS), items measuring respondents’ sociodemographic and health information, last menstrual period, estimated date of delivery, and date of pregnancy end (if postpartum). We examined monthly EQ-5D-5L items, utility values, and EQ VAS scores during pregnancy and postpartum. We used quantile regression adjusted for calendar month of last menstrual period to estimate changes in HRQoL at different time points of pregnancy and postpartum. Results There was a steady increase in the frequency of respondents reporting health-related problems and a decline in EQ-5D-5L utility values from early pregnancy until the ninth month of pregnancy ( β = − 0.21; standard error [SE] 0.02; P < 0.001), followed by a 0.10 (SE 0.02; P < 0.001) unit increase in values during the first postpartum month and a stabilization during the remainder of the postpartum period ( β = 0.02; SE 0.02; P = 0.214). The median EQ-5D-5L utility value was lowest during the ninth month of pregnancy (median 0.78 [interquartile range 0.30]). Conclusions HRQoL as measured by EQ-5D-5L varies across pregnancy, indicating progressive declines throughout pregnancy and a return to first trimester values during the first month postpartum. Studies involving HRQoL measurement in pregnant people should account for the stage of pregnancy in their estimates. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-023-00798-5.

Respiratory diseases remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children especially among children less than five years old. To study the prescribing pattern and assess caregiver's perception about pediatric respiratory disease therapy by using questionnaires. A prospective observational study was carried out for a total of 225 cases of inpatients in pediatric department and caregivers were assessed regarding pediatric respiratory disease therapy by questionnaires. We observed that Majority of the pediatric patients were diagnosed with LRTI 95(42.2%), followed by ARI 60(26.7%), URTI 36(16.0%), Fever and cough 15(6.8%) Pneumonia 11(4.9%), Asthma 3(1.3%), Bronchiolitis and Chronic cough 02(0.8%). Most of the drugs prescribed were Bronchodilators (36.5%). Among Bronchodilators SABA 258(81.6%) were prescribed more in number in which salbutamol were prescribed more (77.5%). Majority of the antibiotics prescribed were Cephalosporin's (58.8%), and among Corticosteroid's Budesonide were prescribed more i.e. (26.32%). Most of the caregivers given formulation preference towards nebulization i.e. (61.4%). Almost (44.5%) of caregivers felt that usage of the nebulizers was easy. Out of 225 caregivers about 88% of the caregivers were satisfied with their child's treatment. Educational interventions must be implemented for health care professionals for more appropriate and cost effective prescribing. A separate parent education program also should be conducted to bring awareness regarding respiratory disease in parents/ caregivers. This will ensure rational use of drugs in pediatric Respiratory diseases and there by improve quality of life.

No abstract

Background Compared to the non-pregnant population, pregnant persons are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 related illness, including higher rates of admission to intensive care and greater mortality. Despite the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant persons, current guidelines for the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy are limited, and the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among US pregnant adults is unclear. Methods As part of an ongoing national longitudinal cohort study, 1,372 pregnant and recently postpartum pregnant persons participated in an online baseline survey, including questions on COVID-19 vaccination status and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines. Preliminary analyses were restricted to 1,041 individuals who were pregnant during vaccine availability (after 14 December 2020). Post-stratification survey weights were applied to ensure results are representative of the general population. Weighted percentages and odds ratios were estimated based on survey responses. Results 39.4% (95% CI 33.7, 45.1%) of respondents received a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Predictors of vaccination included belief that COVID-19 was a serious disease (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.41, 4.11) and concerns about giving birth during the COVID-19 pandemic (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.10, 3.04). The most common reason for receiving a COVID-19 vaccine was to protect themselves (21.2%) or their baby (39.1%). Among unvaccinated respondents, 14.9% planned to receive a vaccine during their pregnancy and 35.3% after pregnancy, 28.6% had no intention of receiving a vaccine, and the remaining 21.1% were uncertain. Among those who never planned to vaccinate, the most common reason was concern about side effects (57.2%). Percent of pregnant persons receiving at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, by month of delivery (postpartum participants) or estimated month of delivery (pregnant participants). Conclusion Our results indicate that despite the lack of clear recommendations for vaccination during pregnancy, more than one-third of pregnant persons received a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Evaluation of the health effects of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, including the ability to protect pregnant persons and their infants from infection, is needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background: Pregnancy induced  hypertension (PIH) is defined as  elevation in blood pressure 140/90 mmHg or greater after 20 weeks of gestation  on two occasions more than 4 hours apart in a newly diagnosed patients. Complications of pregnancy are the major health problems leading to maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Some anti-hypertensive drugs are commonly used to control hypertension.Methods: A prospective, parallel group, open label observation study was carried out at SVS Medical Hospital, Mahabubnagar. Patients were divided into three groups based on severity of hypertension and the drug used for treatment.Results: Of 120 patients diagnosed with PIH majority (50%) of women were in the age group of 21-24 years with 33-37 gestational age. In the present study there was a significant reduction in BP after the treatment with Labetalol when compare to Nifedepine and Methyldopa. Although, all the three groups have shown significant reduction in BP during 24 hrs treatments and the mean time to achieve target BP was shown less in Labetalol group when compare to Methyldopa and Nifedepine and the maximum doses required to achieve target BP was in between 4-6 doses/day. 40% of complication observed was HELLP syndrome.Conclusions: Our study coincides with the previous findings that labetolol is an efficacious and safer drug for use in control of PIH and mean time required to achieve target BP is low when compared to nifedipne and methyldopa.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth remains a major health issue worldwide. Preterm delivery affects over 7–12% of births in India and is responsible for up to 75% of neonatal deaths. Despite advances in medical technology, the prevalence of preterm birth is increasing. Discovery of antenatal corticosteroid for fetal maturation and its adoption into clinical practice highlights several fascinating and universal truths about science and medicine. The challenge in human studies is to demonstrate antenatal corticosteroid administration in pregnancy contributes to developmental programming and how this is manifested in later life. The World Health Organization recommends the use of one course of antenatal steroids for all pregnant women between 26 and 35 weeks of gestation who are at risk of preterm delivery within 7 days. Both, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommend their use between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation (1). The use of antenatal steroids after 34 or 35 weeks of gestation is not recommended unless there is evidence of fetal pulmonary immaturity. Despite this, antenatal steroids are widely used globally across all gestational periods. In a diverse country like India, diversity in clinical practice is a reality. Hence, the present research study intends to study the maternal and perinatal outcomes with antenatal corticosteroid administration in preterm deliveries at Government district hospital, Nandyal in South India. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Ÿ To determine the incidence of RDS at District hospital, Nandyal among neonates delivered between 28-37 weeks due to PTL, PPROM or severe PET whose mothers received ACS and in those whose mothers did not receive ACS. Ÿ To determine the severity of RDS at District hospital, Nandyal among neonates delivered between 28-37 weeks due to PTL, PPROM or severe PET whose mothers received ACS and in those whose mothers did not receive ACS. Ÿ To compare the neonatal mortality among neonates delivered between 28-37 weeks due to PTL, PPROM or severe PET whose mothers received ACS with those whose mothers did not receive ACS. Ÿ To determine the effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroid administration in preventing early neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in early preterm labour versus late preterm labour. Ÿ To determine the effectiveness of ACS administration in preventing neonatal complications with respect to the mode of delivery. METHODOLOGY: Study was conducted at Government District Hospital, Nandyal from 01/01/2019 to 30/10/2019. A structured questionnaire was prepared under guidance of thesis guide. All pregnant women with gestational age between 28 completed weeks to 37 completed weeks, presenting in OPD either in labour or getting admitted due to any other maternal medical complication, are initially assessed thoroughly to estimate the gestational age by history, LMP, early USG, and clinical examination. They are given a course of ACS if they were not expecting delivery within next 1 hour, after explaining the benets and risks of ACS as per recommendations of Federation of International st Gynecology and Obstetrics. Those who did not receive ACS or those who delivered within 24hrs of administration of 1 dose of ACS were considered as subjects in NACS group. Those who received ACS were considered as subjects in ACS group. After delivery, the neonate is followed up in NICU until discharged or until 7 days whichever is shorter. Mother is followed up for any clinical signs of infection, until she is discharged. Data is analyzed scientically. RESULTS: In Antenatal corticosteroids group (ACS), there were 36 subjects within 20 years, 43 subjects between 20-25 years, 29 subjects between 25-30 years, 25 subjects between 30-35 years. In No Antenatal corticosteroids group (NACS), there were 32 subjects within 20 years, 49 subjects between 20-25 years, 25 subjects between 25-30 years, 10 subjects between 30-35 years. Study observed that Antenatal corticosteroids group had lower incidence of Respiratory distress syndrome compared to No Antenatal corticosteroids group (12.07% versus 23.28%). Antenatal corticosteroids group had lower incidence of severe Respiratory distress syndrome compared to No Antenatal corticosteroids group (21.3 % versus 33.33%) among those who had Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Antenatal corticosteroids group had fewer admissions to NICU than No Antenatal corticosteroids group (20.69% versus 33.62%). Antenatal corticosteroids group had lower mortality than No Antenatal corticosteroids group (12.07 % versus 22.41%). Antenatal corticosteroids group had 35 % less chances of Respiratory distress syndrome compared to No Antenatal corticosteroids group. In No Antenatal corticosteroids group, subjects who underwent vaginal delivery had 10% less risk compared to those who underwent LSCS for their neonates to have Respiratory distress syndrome. In Antenatal corticosteroids group, subjects who underwent vaginal delivery had 14.29 % less risk compared to those who underwent LSCS for their neonates to have Respiratory distress syndrome. Antenatal corticosteroids group had maternal infection rate comparable to No Antenatal Corticosteroids group. CONCLUSION: Use of antenatal corticosteroids was found to be benecial in pregnant women with Gestational age of 28 completed weeks to less than 37 completed weeks at Government District hospital, Nandyal. Antenatal corticosteroids did not have statistically signicant adverse effects (i.e. increased rate of infection) in mothers.