So far, our endoscope-based transumbilical cholecystectomy technique has not yielded satisfactory results in humans. Further instrument and accessory improvements may increase both success rate and acceptance. Scarless surgery without the inherent risks of a transluminal approach may then become feasible.
BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed ‘standalone’ bariatric procedure in India. Staple line gastric leaks occur infrequently but cause significant and prolonged morbidity. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the management of patients with a gastric leak after LSG for morbid obesity at our institution.PATIENTS AND METHODS:From February 2008 to 2014, 650 patients with different degrees of morbid obesity underwent LSG. Among these, all those diagnosed with a gastric leak were included in the study. Patients referred to our institution with gastric leak after LSG were also included. The time of presentation, site of leak, investigations performed, treatment given and time of closure of all leaks were analysed.RESULTS:Among the 650 patients who underwent LSG, 3 (0.46%) developed a gastric leak. Two patients were referred after LSG was performed at another institution. The mean age was 45.60 ± 15.43 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.79 ± 5.35. Gastric leak was diagnosed 24 h to 7 months after surgery. One was early, two were intermediate and two were late leaks. Two were type I and three were type II gastric leaks. Endoscopic oesophageal stenting was used variably before or after re-surgery. Re-surgery was performed in all and included stapled fistula excision (re-sleeve), suture repair only or with conversion to roux-en-Y gastric bypass or fistula jujenostomy. There was no mortality.CONCLUSION:Leakage closure time may be shorter with intervention than expectant management. Sequence and choice of endoscopic oesophageal stenting and/or surgical re-intervention should be individualized according to clinical presentation.
NAFLD has a high prevalence among morbidly obese patients. Elevated ALT, HT, T2DM, and the metabolic syndrome are predictors for NAFLD and its high-risk histological components. Routine intraoperative liver biopsy is safe in morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgery for diagnosing NAFLD.
Aim Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a new sphincter-sparing surgical technique increasingly used to treat fistulae-in-ano yielding good results. The aim of this study was to evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of complex fistulae-in-ano and to determine factors associated with recurrence and its subsequent management.Method A prospective observational study was performed of 167 patients with complex fistula-in-ano treated by LIFT from June 2013 to January 2014. In all patients a LIFT with partial core-out of the fistula tract was performed.Results There were 167 patients of mean age 43.6 AE 12.8 years. Thirty-three fistulae were recurrent. 150 were trans-sphincteric, 16 were intersphincteric and one was a suprasphincteric fistula. The median postoperative stay was 2 (range: 1-14) days (mean = 2.4 days). At follow up there was no change in continence. The median healing time was 4 (range: 1-8) weeks. Two patients developed an intersphincteric abscess needing surgical drainage healing uneventfully. The mean follow up was 12.8 [median = 12 (range: 4-22)] months. The healing rate was 94.1%. Ten (5.9%) patients developed a recurrent fistula that was managed by a second LIFT procedure in seven, a sinus tract excision with curettage in two and seton placement in one. Recurrence was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus and perianal collections and showed an increased incidence with tract abscesses and multiple tracts.Conclusion LIFT has a high success rate in complex fistulae-in-ano. Recurrence is related to diabetes mellitus, perianal collections, tract abscesses and multiple tracts and a second LIFT procedure may be feasible and efficient.Keywords Fistula-in-ano, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, peri-anal abscess, recurrent fistula-in-ano What does this paper add to literature? This is the largest experience of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in the literature, to date, for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. It identifies factors associated with recurrence and deals with the further management.
So far, this transumbilical approach to the appendectomy in humans has not been reported. We think that this method of approach is an effective technique by itself and an ideal "stepping stone" to NOTES, as well as helpful to train laparoscopic surgeons to make the transition to full-fledged NOTES. Unlike the transgastric or transvaginal approaches, the umbilical approach allows an easy maneuverability of the endoscope, though at the cost of an umbilical scar. The technical ease of the procedure and early outcome seem satisfactory. This technique may be considered as a "precursor" to NOTES.
Endoscopic stenting should be considered a primary option for managing oesophageal leaks. Delayed oral intake may reduce the incidence of stent migration. Larger stents (bariatric or colorectal stents) serve as a useful option in case of migrated stents. Combined minimally invasive procedures can be safely adapted in appropriate clinical circumstances and may contribute to better outcomes.
ARFI SWV values do not correlate with fibrosis on liver biopsy in morbidly obese patients and lack accuracy for diagnosis. Discordant values may be related to higher BMI and increasing hepatic steatosis.
Preoperative UGI endoscopy yielded a high proportion of endoscopic abnormalities even in asymptomatic patients. Surgery was delayed to treat severe mucosal lesions and to investigate polypoidal findings in the majority. A change in surgical approach and surveillance for malignancy was needed in a few cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.