No abstract

Limitations in the ability to identify knee extensor loading deficits during gait in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) may underlie their persistence. A recent study suggested that shank angular velocity, directly output from inertial sensors, differed during gait between individuals post-ACLr and controls. However, it is not clear if this kinematic variable relates to knee moments calculated using joint kinematics and ground reaction forces. Heel rocker mechanics during loading response of gait, characterized by rapid shank rotation, require knee extensor control. Measures of shank angular velocity may be reflective of knee moments. This study investigated the relationship between shank angular velocity and knee extensor moment during gait in individuals (n=19) 96.7±16.8 days post-ACLr. Gait was assessed concurrently using inertial sensors and a marker-based motion system with force platforms. Peak angular velocity and knee extensor moment were strongly correlated (r=0.75, p<0.001) and between limb ratios of angular velocity predicted between limb ratios of extensor moment (r2=0.57 ,p<0.001) in the absence of between limb differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters. The strength of these relationships indicate that shank kinematic data offer meaningful information regarding knee loading and provide a potential alternative to full motion analysis systems for identification of altered knee loading following ACLr

Background Decreased extensor moments in the surgical knee during bilateral squats can persist beyond 1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This is accomplished using interlimb and intralimb compensations. Objectives This study sought to assess loading during squatting longitudinally, 3 and 5 months post ACLR, and to determine the extent to which interlimb and intralimb compensations contribute to reduced knee extensor moments. Methods In this controlled, longitudinal laboratory study, 11 individuals (4 male) underwent 3-D motion analysis of a squat at 3 and 5 months post ACLR. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (limb by time) assessed differences in peak knee and hip flexion angles, knee extensor moment, vertical ground reaction force, and hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the contribution of interlimb (between-limb vertical ground reaction force ratio) and intralimb (within-surgical-limb hip-to-knee moment ratio) compensations to the between-limb knee extensor moment ratio. Results A significant effect of limb was observed for knee flexion angle, knee extensor moment, vertical ground reaction force, and hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio, while a significant effect of time was observed for knee extensor moment and hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio. At 3 months, the vertical ground reaction force ratio and hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio predicted the knee extensor moment ratio (R = 0.854, P<.001). At 5 months, the hip-to-knee extensor moment ratio predicted the knee extensor moment ratio (R = 0.584, P = .006). Conclusion Individuals used interlimb and intralimb compensations to reduce the knee extensor moment of the surgical limb at 3 months post ACLR. Similar reductions in the knee extensor moment at 5 months were accomplished with only intralimb compensations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(9):713-718. Epub 12 Jun 2018. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.7977.

Modulation of kinetics and kinematics contribute to decreases in knee extensor moments during gait and provide direction for targeted interventions to restore gait mechanics.

Background: Clinically, normalization of gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is defined as the absence of observable deviations. However, biomechanical studies report altered knee mechanics during loading response (LR); a time of double limb support and weight transfer between limbs. It is conceivable that subtle adjustments in whole body mechanics, including center of mass (COM) velocity and ground reaction force (GRF) peaks and timing, are present. Research question:The purpose was to compare limb and whole body mechanics during LR of gait in the surgical and non-surgical limbs post-ACLr.Methods: Anterior and vertical COM velocity at initial contact; knee flexion range of motion, peak knee extensor moment, peak vertical and posterior GRF, minimum vertical COM position and maximum anterior and vertical COM velocity during LR were identified for twenty individuals 112±17 days post-ACLr without observable gait deficits. To assess differences in timing of COM variables, coupling angles (vector coding) were calculated for multidirectional coordination of vertical and anteroposterior COM velocities and GRFs and categorized as inphase, anti-phase, vertical phase, or anteroposterior phase coordination. Paired t-tests compared peaks between limbs; non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared coordination pattern frequency.Results: Less knee range of motion (5.6 degrees), 30% smaller knee extensor moment, 11% smaller posterior GRF, and slower anterior COM velocity at initial contact (2%) and peak during