We have performed studies aimed at elucidating the nature of the humoral immune response in rapidly progressive periodontitis (RPP). We analyzed the sera of 36 periodontally normal subjects and 36 RPP patients for titers and avidities of IgG antibodies reactive with the antigens of Porphyromonas gingivalis using ELISA, prior to and following treatment. We used whole‐cell sonicate, purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and total extractable protein as plate antigens. Twelve of the patients had antibody titers at least 2‐fold greater than the median of the controls and were designated as seropositive. The remaining 24 patients had titers that did not exceed twice the median titer of the controls and were designated as seronegative. For both patient groups, antibody titers were highest when whole‐cell antigen was used, intermediate for LPS, and lowest for the protein fraction. Following treatment, median titer for seropositive patients decreased from pretreatment values of 241.7 to 76.5, while median titer for seronegative patients increased from 39.5 to 80.1. Avidities of pretreatment sera from both patient groups for all 3 antigen preparations were lower than the median avidities of the control sera. Avidity significantly increased following treatment to levels greater than those for control sera in both patient groups. Thus, some young adults with severe periodontitis mount a humoral immune response and produce high levels of serum IgG antibodies reactive with antigens of P. gingivalis, while others do not. The antibodies produced are of relatively low avidity, and may therefore be relatively ineffective biologically. Therapy, which greatly reduces antigen load, appears to stimulate production of higher avidity IgG antibodies in both patient groups; in the seropositive group, low avidity antibodies appear to be replaced by antibodies of higher avidity. Both the purified LPS and protein fractions contain reactive antigen(s), although LPS binds more antibody. Our data are consistent with the idea that many RPP patients do not produce protective levels of biologically functional antibody during the course of their natural infection, but they may be stimulated to do so by treatment. J Periodontol 1991; 62:781–791.
Data from several sources demonstrate that disease-active and disease-inactive periodontal pockets exist, and that disease progression occurs in bursts of activity. Currently used diagnostic procedures do not distinguish between disease-active and disease-inactive sites at any given point in time. We report the results of studies aimed at determining whether levels of the enzyme aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) are associated with disease activity as assessed by the level of gingival inflammation and probing attachment loss. 25 previously treated periodontitis patients participating in a quarterly recall maintenance program, who had experienced recurrent periodontal deterioration, served as experimental subjects. Patients were evaluated at 3-month intervals for 2 years. Values for plaque index, gingival index, and probing attachment level were recorded, and 30-second samples of gingival fluid harvested from the mesiobuccal aspect of the 4 first molars and the distal of the 4 lateral incisors. GCF volume was measured using a Periotron 6000, and AST activity was measured by a standard method. Sites were ranked in a hierarchy based on the degree of certainty of attachment loss as well as the severity of gingival inflammation, and the relationship of the values to AST levels was determined. Three models were used to analyze the resulting data, and all led to the same conclusion. Maximum enzyme level was significantly elevated at sites with confirmed disease activity as assessed by attachment loss, with maximum AST levels 725 units higher at these sites, on average, than at other sites (p less than 0.0001). Our data support the idea that an objective diagnostic test, based on levels of AST in GCF, that distinguishes between disease-active and disease-inactive sites may be possible.
Lipopolysaccharide from a variety of bacterial sources is known to inhibit gingival fibroblast proliferation and synthetic activity and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of periodontal inflammation. However, it may be involved not only in pathogenesis but also be responsible for delayed wound healing following periodontal therapy. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the inhibitory effect of LPS on gingival fibroblast proliferation could be reversed by growth factors. Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of varying concentrations of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or Salmonella enteritidis LPS to determine the optimal concentrations for stimulation and inhibition of proliferation respectively. The effect of PDGF on LPS inhibition of fibroblast proliferation was studied by combining PDGF and LPS together at the outset of the experimental period or adding PDGF to cells which had been previously primed with LPS. Cell proliferation was monitored by incorporation of 3H-thymidine into precipitable DNA. The results indicated that maximal inhibition of fibroblast proliferation was obtained with 50 micrograms/ml LPS and maximal stimulation of proliferation with 5 ng/ml PDGF. PDGF was found to restore the proliferative activity of the cells exposed to LPS to approximately 60% of their control counterparts. A similar value was obtained for cultures exposed to PDGF after an extended priming period of LPS exposure. Subtle differences were noted in the time taken for cells to complete their cell cycle in the various culture conditions and this may reflect variations in subpopulations of cells in their response to various mitogenic stimuli. Overall the results indicate that PDGF has the capacity to significantly negate and reverse the inhibitory effects of LPS on human gingival fibroblast proliferation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.