Abstract. Pumice from the``Minoan eruption'' on Thera (Cyclades, Greece) was investigated to reveal the differences between the composition of the bulk material, which contains a certain percentage of crystallites, and the pure glass phase. This is important for the identi®cation of vitric tephra layers found in the Eastern Mediterranean region in archaeological context and in deep sea drilling cores. Eruption products, deposited at some distance, have usually lost their crystalline fraction due to gravity separation and consist only of glass shards. Only major element distributions in such layers and in pumiceous glass phases have been published up to now, but these data are not suf®cient for a reliable identi®cation of the volcanic source, as several other eruptions are known to have produced chemically very similar layers in this region (Milos, Nisyros, Yali, Kos). Therefore, a technique has been developed to separate the glass phase from the primary pumice to reveal differences in the trace element distributions obtained by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). X-ray diffractometry and microscopical techniques were applied to check the purity of this fraction. The concentrations of the major constituents, in particular Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Si, and Ti were determined by X-ray¯uorescence (XRF) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), those of Al, Ba, Ca, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Dy, Eu, Fe, Hf, K, La, Lu, Mn, Na, Nd, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Ta, Ti, Th, U, Yb and Zr by instrumental neutron activation analysis and partly also by X-ray¯uorescence. Subtle differences between the compositions of the glass phase and the bulk material are explained by differentiation during partial crystallization and their applicability to the classi®cation of tephra layers is demonstrated.
