No abstract

Background. Assessment methods for atopic dermatitis (AD) are not standardized, and therapeutic studies are difficult to interpret. Aims. To obtain a consensus on assessment methods in AD and to use a statistical method to develop a composite severity index.Methods. Consensus definitions were given for items used in the scoring system (extent, intensity, subjective) and illustrated for intensity items. Slides were reviewed to address within and between-observer variability by a group of 10 trained clinicians, and data were statistically evaluated with a two way analysis of variance. Two variants of an assessment system were compared in 88 patients at 5 different institutions. Data were analyzed using principal-component analysis. Results. For 5 intensity items studied (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriations, lichenification), within- and between-observer variability was good overall, except for edema/papulation which was difficult to assess with slides. In the series of 88 patients, principal-component analysis allowed to extract two unrelated components: the first one accounting for 33% of total variance was interpreted as a ‘severity’ component; the second one, accounting for 18% of variance, was interpreted as a ‘profile’ component distinguishing patients with mostly erythema and subjective symptoms and those with mostly lichenification and dryness and lower subjective symptoms. Of the two evaluation systems used, the one using the rule of nine to assess extent was found more workable than the one using a distribution × intensity product. A scoring index (SCORAD) combining extent, severity and subjective symptoms was mathematically derived from the first system and showed a normal distribution of the population studied. Conclusion. The final choice for the evaluation system was mostly made based on simplicity and easy routine use in outpatient clinics. Based on mathematical appreciation of weights of the items used in the assessment of AD, extent and subjective symptoms account for around 20% each of the total score, intensity items representing 60%. The so-designed composite index SCORAD needs to be further tested in clinical trials.

Background: We previously proposed a set of 4 clinical criteria for the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid (BP) that consisted of age greater than 70 years, absence of atrophic scars, absence of mucosal involvement and absence of predominant bullous lesions on the neck and head. These results have been challenged because direct immunoelectron microscopy (IEM), which was used as the standard diagnostic criterion in our initial study, does not identify the different antigens of the basement membrane zone. Objective: To reassess the validity of these clinical criteria for the diagnosis of BP using immunoblot analysis of patient sera as the main diagnostic criterion, in order to precisely identify the antigens recognized by patient sera. Methods: One hundred and eighty-nine sera from patients with various subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) were tested by immunoblotting using dermal and epidermal extracts. IEM was used as a complementary diagnostic procedure in a few patients whose serum recognized BPAG2 exclusively or was negative in immunoblotting. Results: 142 patients (75%) had at least 3 of the 4 clinical diagnostic criteria. Sera from patients who lacked the set of BP clinical criteria were more frequently immunoblot negative (34%) than sera from patients who had the criteria (18%; p = 0.025). BPAG1 was more frequently recognized by sera from patients with the set of BP clinical criteria (78%) than by sera from patients without the criteria (45%; p = 5·10^–4). In contrast, BPAG2 was recognized by a great number of sera from patients who lacked the criteria of BP (71%), which was in accordance with the presence of numerous patients with cicatricial pemphigoid in this group. Among patients with various subepidermal AIBDs, the diagnosis of BP could be made with a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 90% and an excellent prognostic positive value over 95%, if 3 of these clinical criteria were present. Conclusion: These results confirm the interest of this set of clinical criteria for the rapid diagnosis of BP.

A skin equivalent model has been used to fabricate tissues with psoriatic and normal cells. Psoriatic fibroblasts can induce hyperproliferative activity in normal keratinocytes. The psoriatic epidermis from lesions continues to proliferate at high rates for at least 15 days in this model, and normal fibroblasts are unable to suppress this hyperproliferation. The primary defect in psoriatic skin may reside in the dermal fibroblast.

Our data reveal the extremely high frequency, diversity and potential severity of paediatric emergency skin disorders. Specific educational measures and closer co-operation between Dermatologists and Paediatricians are essential if the skin care dispensed to children and teenagers is to be improved.

A new method for studying epidermalization in vitro is described. It consists of inserting a punch biopsy that serves as a source of epidermis into dermal equivalent freshly made up, with fibroblasts mixed in a collagen matrix. Fibroblasts cling to collagen fibrils and contract the matrix, leading in 3 days to a resistant dermal equivalent holding the punch biopsy firmly in place. At day 5, a culture medium favouring epidermal growth was used and a fringe of a new epidermis appeared around the punch, the area of which grew linearly with time. This new epidermis showed a pattern of differentiation similar to epidermis in vivo, with cuboidal basal cells, keratohyalin granules, membrane coating granules and the expression of the 65-67 kd keratin subset. The method seems to combine the advantages of the explant technique and of classical keratinocyte cultures, providing the researcher with a large quantity of differentiated epidermis, the pharmacologist with simple and quantitative system in which to study modifications of growth and differentiation of epidermis, and the plastic surgeon with a possible material for skin grafting.

Lipodystrophies, characterized by reduction of subcutaneous fat over part or all of the body surface, are uncommon. Their causes are unknown. Recently, lipodystrophy has been reported in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients taking protease inhibitors, which have been recommended since 1996 as standard therapy for HIV disease in combination with nucleoside analogues. In these cases, lipodystrophy consists of an association of peripheral lipoatrophy with central adiposity. We report four HIV-infected men on protease inhibitors who developed a disfiguring lipodystrophy. In three of them, the protease inhibitor was administered for a mean duration of 21.5 months (range 19-23) with good immunological and virological responses. Patient 4 had been treated for 2 years with successive combinations of protease inhibitors with nucleoside analogues without success. The four patients progressively developed an increase in abdominal girth associated with fat wasting of the face and legs. Two of them had recurrent paronychia of the great toes. Triglyceride levels were moderately increased in all patients, and one had a slightly increased cholesterol level. One patient had elevated glucose and insulin plasma levels during a glucose tolerance test. In two patients, a deep biopsy taken from the thigh showed thinning of the subcutaneous fat without other morphological changes. Computed tomographic scans of the face and abdomen confirmed the loss of almost all subcutaneous fat of the cheek and temporal regions, and abdominal perivisceral fat accumulation. For patients 1-3, the protease inhibitor was replaced by a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Nine months later, dysmorphic changes had not regressed, but lipid abnormalities had returned to normal and the paronychia had disappeared.

A series of 90 consecutive cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) observed in a single center between 1985 and March 1991 was compared to a previous series from the same institution in order to look for changes in the characteristics of the patients and in the drug etiology. The most salient change was the high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among patients with TEN (20/90). This high rate of HIV infection was linked to two other changes: higher number of male patients leading to an equilibrated sex ratio and an increased role of sulfonamides – mainly sulfadiazine – as etiologic agents.