No abstract

The clinical profile of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated to determine if earlier results in the BENEFIT study were sustained at 3 years. BENEFIT is a randomized 3 year, phase III study in adults receiving a kidney transplant from a living or standard criteria deceased donor. Patients were randomized to a more ( Belatacept-treated patients maintained a high rate of patient and graft survival that was comparable to cyclosporine-treated patients, despite an early increased occurrence of acute rejection and PTLD.

SummaryBackground and objectives Prolonged use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients is associated with renal and nonrenal toxicity and an increase in cardiovascular risk factors. Belatacept-based regimens may provide a treatment option for patients who switch from CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression.Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a randomized, open-label Phase II trial in renal transplant patients with stable graft function and receiving a CNI-based regimen. Patients who were Ն6 months but Յ36 months after transplantation were randomized to either switch to belatacept or continue CNI treatment. All patients received background maintenance immunosuppression. The primary end point was the change in calculated GFR (cGFR) from baseline to month 12.Results Patients were randomized either to switch to belatacept (n ϭ 84) or to remain on a CNI-based regimen (n ϭ 89). At month 12, the mean (SD) change from baseline in cGFR was higher in the belatacept group versus the CNI group. Six patients in the belatacept group had acute rejection episodes, all within the first 6 months; all resolved with no allograft loss. By month 12, one patient in the CNI group died with a functioning graft, whereas no patients in the belatacept group had graft loss. The overall safety profile was similar between groups. ConclusionsThe study identifies a potentially safe and feasible method for switching stable renal transplant patients from a cyclosporine-or tacrolimus-based regimen to a belatacept-based regimen, which may allow improved renal function in patients currently treated with CNIs.

TRANSFORM (TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus‐based regiMen) was a 24‐month, prospective, open‐label trial in 2037 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized (1:1) within 24 hours of transplantation to receive everolimus (EVR) with reduced‐exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR + rCNI) or mycophenolate with standard‐exposure CNI. Consistent with previously reported 12‐month findings, noninferiority of the EVR + rCNI regimen for the primary endpoint of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was achieved at month 24 (47.9% vs 43.7%; difference = 4.2%; 95% confidence interval = −0.3, 8.7; P = .006). Mean eGFR was stable up to month 24 (52.6 vs 54.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2) in both arms. The incidence of de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) was lower in the EVR + rCNI arm (12.3% vs 17.6%) among on‐treatment patients. Although discontinuation rates due to adverse events were higher with EVR + rCNI (27.2% vs 15.0%), rates of cytomegalovirus (2.8% vs 13.5%) and BK virus (5.8% vs 10.3%) infections were lower. Cytomegalovirus infection rates were significantly lower with EVR + rCNI even in the D+/R− high‐risk group (P < .0001). In conclusion, the EVR + rCNI regimen offers comparable efficacy and graft function with low tBPAR and dnDSA rates and significantly lower incidence of viral infections relative to standard‐of‐care up to 24 months. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01950819.

Recipients of extended-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long-term outcomes compared to standard-criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3-year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty-three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacepttreated versus cyclosporine-treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine-treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept-treated patients (27-30%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept-treated patients (two in MI, three in LI), most of which occurred during the first 18 months; four additional cases (3 in LI, 1 in cyclosporine) occurred after 3 years. Tuberculosis was reported in two MI, four LI and no cyclosporine patients. In conclusion, at 3 years after transplantation, immunosuppression with belatacept resulted in similar patient survival, graft survival and acute rejection, with better renal function compared with cyclosporine. As previously reported, PTLD and tuberculosis were the principal safety findings associated with belatacept in this study population.Key words: Belatacept, cyclosporine, extended criteria donor, kidney, renal function Abbreviations: BENEFIT-EXT, belatacept evaluation of nephroprotection and efficacy as first-line immunosupression trial-EXTended criteria donors; CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; DCD, donation after cardiac death; ECD, extended criteria donor; LI, less intensive; MI, more intensive; PTLD, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder; UNOS, United Network for Organ Sharing.