Objective: The Soft Skills Project examined the professional development of medical students at the University of Pretoria, especially their doctor-patient interaction skills and professional socialisation. This paper reports on one of the findings of the project, namely the importance that medical students attach to role models in the development of soft skills. Methods: We used a qualitative method with symbolic interactionism and grounded theory as framework. Fourty two final-year students from the last cohort following the traditional curriculum at the University of Pretoria in 2001, and 49 final years from the first cohort following the reformed curriculum in 2002 were recruited. Data were collected by applying focus groups, in-depth, individual interviews, as well as autobiographical sketches. Data were captured by means of audio tape recordings, transcripts of the tapes, researchers' field notes, and written accounts by students, and were analysed by using a general inductive approach. Results: There were no striking differences between the comments of the two groups. Students considered registrars to be the most influential role models in the clinical teaching context, followed by specialist consultants. Their idea of a good role model was a clinically and academically competent doctor that cared about patients, had good interpersonal skills, and who could inspire students. Students needed and appreciated good role models to help them to develop their own soft skills. They expected guidance and behavioural examples from clinical teachers. Although there were competent role models, the students were exposed to poor role models. Poor role models mainly affect students negatively. Students tend to imitate and perpetuate unacceptable behaviour. Furthermore, poor role models have a negative emotional effect on students and are detrimental to their moral and learning environment. Sometimes, poor role models have a paradoxical positive effect in the sense that they inform students how not to behave. Conclusion: Medical schools and medical doctors working with medical students should be consciously aware of the importance of role models both when allocating clinical teachers to students, and while performing duties with students. It is especially necessary to realise that poor role modelling has important detrimental effects on students. Therefore, an attempt should be made to ensure that not only clinical examination skills, but also soft skills, are demonstrated at the bedside. Measures to ensure adequate exposure of students to positive role models could include: staff development; the identification of good role models to guide registrars; and a reallocation of tasks, where possible, to increase the exposure of students to the 'natural' role models.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were determined in a population of 20 adults and 36 pediatric patients admitted into an intensive care unit. Amikacin was administered by repeated intravenous infusion over 0.5 h (600 to 1,350 mg for adults; 70 to 1,500 mg for children). The number of administrations ranged from 2 to 17, and the number of samples collected from each patient ranged from 2 to 70. The population enrolled in the study had large variabilities in age (0.5 to 85 years), weight (6 to 95 kg), height (72 to 187 cm), creatinine clearance rate (18 to 110 ml/min), blood urea nitrogen concentration (1.5 to 15 mmol/liter), and total protein concentration (30 to 91 g/liter). The mean population parameters and their interindividual variabilities were obtained for an initial group of 44 patients (16 adults and 28 children). A two-compartment model was fitted to the population data by using the computer program P-PHARM. Model selection was guided by evaluation of the minimum objective function and the weighted residuals. The population analysis has been performed with the complete set of the collected data, including the individual serum amikacin concentration together with the individual estimate of the creatinine clearance values. The potential sources of variability in the population parameters were investigated by using patients' age, height, weight, creatinine clearance, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and total protein concentration as covariables. A test group of 12 additional patients (4 adults and 8 children) was used to evaluate the predictive performances of the population parameters. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by a Bayesian fitting procedure. From the resulting individualized values of the parameters, the concentrations of amikacin in the serum of the patients were calculated. To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian estimation, the experimental concentrations were compared with the predicted ones. The Bayesian approached developed in the study accurately predicts amikacin concentrations in serum and allows for the estimation of amikacin pharmacokinetics parameters, minimizing the risk of bias in the prediction. This was demonstrated in patients with both stable and unstable renal functions.
BackgroundThis paper reports on medical students' views on the ways in which their 'soft skills' were developed. It is the result of a study on soft skills among two groups of students before and after curriculum reform at the School of Medicine of the University of Pretoria. One of the aims of the reform was to provide more teaching and learning opportunities for the development of soft skills. Soft skills include professional interpersonal and social skills, communication skills, and professional and ethical attitudes. MethodsAs symbolic interactionism was used as the theoretical framework to guide the research, qualitative methods were used to collect the data. A purposive-theoretical sample of 42 final-year medical students from the traditional curriculum and 49 from the reformed curriculum was recruited. Data were collected by means of focus groups, individual in-depth interviews and autobiographical sketches. ResultsThe same categories of comments emerged from the data collected from the study participants from both the traditional and the reformed curriculum. The students ascribed their behaviour related to soft skills to personality and innate features. They had varying opinions on whether soft skills could be taught, but there was as a strong feeling that teaching should focus on principles and guidelines for dealing with difficult situations. They believed that, in the end, they should take responsibility for their own development of soft skills.Most participants felt they could at least grow through exposure to teaching activities and the observation of role models. They also indicated that they had developed their soft skills and constructed their own identity through their interaction with others. Their definition of situations was shaped by their interactions with doctors and educators, fellow students and other health professionals. Interaction with patients was considered the most important. For both groups of students their third year was a watershed, as it is the first year of more intensive patient contact and the beginning of serious learning from interaction with patients.The views on the development of soft skills differed very little between the traditional and reformed curriculum groups, except that students who had followed the reformed curriculum felt more prepared through the increased teaching and training efforts. Further consideration needs to be given to the intention of the changed curriculum compared to the actual effect.The way in which the participants in the study described their development of soft skills could be categorised as a complex interplay between 'being' and 'becoming'. Instead of using the word 'acquisition' of soft skills, 'development' seemed to be more appropriate. The metaphor of 'guiding' and 'growing' also captures the development of these skills better than the terms 'teaching' and 'learning'. ConclusionTeaching activities in the clinical years should be adapted with a view to facilitating the students' professional growth. New models for the develo...
We retrospectively analyzed amikacin pharmacokinetics in 19 critically ill patients who received amikacin intravenously. Fourteen subjects (577 serum amikacin concentrations, 167 urine measurements) were studied to obtain data for population modeling, while 5 patients (267 serum amikacin concentrations, 68 urine measurements) were studied for the assessment of predictive performance. The population analysis was performed using serum and urine amikacin measurements; the renal clearance of amikacin was expressed as a function of creatinine clearance. A two-compartment model was fitted to the population data by using NONMEM. The population characteristics of the pharmacokinetic parameters (fixed and random effects) were estimated using the FOCE method. The population pharmacokinetic parameters with the interindividual variability (CV%) were as follows: slope (0.254, 126%) and intercept (3 l/h, 59.6%) of the linear model which relate the amikacin renal clearance to the creatinine clearance, initial volume of distribution (17.1 l, 22.2%), intercompartment clearance (5.22 l/h, 104%), steady state volume of distribution (55.2 l, 64.1%) and urinary elimination (67.5%, 36.3%). The Bayesian approach developed in this study accurately predicts amikacin concentrations in serum and urine and allows for the estimation of amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters, minimizing the risk of bias in the prediction.
Objective: This paper reports on the conceptualisation of "soft skills" as part of a study carried out among two groups of undergraduate medical students before and after curriculum reform at the School of Medicine of the University of Pretoria. Congruent with a call from the World Psychiatric Association, the curriculum reform that was undertaken aimed, inter alia, to place more emphasis on soft skills, including professional interpersonal and social skills, communication skills, and professional and ethical attitudes. Methods: Qualitative methods were used to arrive at a descriptive comparison of the conceptualisation of soft skills by final-year medical students of the traditional curriculum with those of final-year students who had followed the reformed curriculum. A purposive-theoretical sampling method was followed; 42 students from the traditional curriculum and 49 from the reformed curriculum were sampled. Data were collected from seven focus groups, 16 individual interviews, and 23 essays (autobiographical sketches). Results: Both groups of students revealed conceptualisations of soft skills that were similar in kind. The themes they pinpointed were the doctor-patient relationship; relationships with other professionals; being a good listener; explaining things to patients; using good communication skills; establishing rapport with patients from different cultural backgrounds; having a professionally correct attitude; being really interested in patients' well being; having empathy; coping with patients, managing difficult situations, and being ethical and professional. However, the traditional curriculum students offered fewer examples and described fewer experiences that exemplified their soft skills. Students following the reformed curriculum gave rich accounts of their conceptualisation in terms of their own experiences and practical examples of how soft skills had been or could be used, particularly in difficult interpersonal situations. Moreover, they came up with helpful ways of dealing with difficult situations, which surpassed the suggestions offered by the students following the traditional curriculum. Conclusion: The educational and training efforts of the reformed curriculum are associated with an adeptness on the part of the students at applying soft skills to the demands of difficult clinical situations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.