BackgroundBlunt thoracic trauma is one of the critical injury mechanisms in multiply injured trauma victims. Although these patients present a plethora of potential structural damages to vital organs, it remains debated which injuries actually influence outcome and thereby should be addressed initially. Hence, the aim of this study was to identify the influence of critical structural damages on mortality.MethodsAll patients in the database of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) from 2002–2011 with AIS Chest ≥ 2, blunt trauma, age of 16 or older and an ISS ≥ 16 were analyzed.Outcome parameters were in-hospital mortality as well as ventilation time in patients surviving the initial 14 days after trauma.Results22613 Patients were included (mean ISS 30.5 ± 12.6; 74.7% male; Mean Age 46.1 ± 197 years; mortality 17.5%; mean duration of ventilation 7.3 ± 11.5; mean ICU stay 11.7 ± 14.1 days).Only a limited number of specific injuries had a significant impact on survival. Major thoracic vessel injuries (AIS ≥5), bilateral lung contusion, bilateral flail chest, structural heart injury (AIS ≥3) significantly influence mortality in study patients. Several extrathoracic factors (age, blood transfusion, systolic blood pressure and extrathoracic severe injuries) were also predictive of increased mortality.Most injuries of the thoracic wall had no or only a moderate effect on the duration of ventilation. Injuries to the lung (laceration, contusion or pneumothoraces) had a moderate prolonging effect. Cardiac injuries and severe injuries to the thoracic vessels induced a substantially prolonged ventilation interval.ConclusionsWe demonstrate quantitatively the influence of specific structural damages of the chest on critical outcome parameters. While most injuries of the chest wall have no or only limited impact in the study collective, injuries to the lung overall show adverse outcome. Injuries to the heart or thoracic vessels have a devastating prognosis following blunt chest trauma.

Treatment of patients with traumatic macroamputations is challenging. The aim of this study is to analyze the significance of this type of injury in TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) and to depict the rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation, epidemiologic data, as well as outcome in severely injured patients with amputations. We acquired data from the TR-DGU of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The inclusion criteria for our study were Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, macroamputation, and available data about the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code. A total of 48,908 of 67,425 patients had an ISS greater than 9 and available data about the AIS code. In total, 926 (1.9%) of 48,908 patients had an immediate traumatic macroamputation on-scene. Thereof, 298 patients (32.2%) had a macroamputation of the arms, 605 patients (65.3%) had an amputation of the legs, and 23 patients (2.5%) had both. Among them, 457 patients (49.4%) with a macroamputation had monotrauma. In total, 126 patients (13.6%) underwent replantation and 800 patients (86.4%) underwent formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation. Seventy-six (23.7%) of 321 patients with upper-extremity amputations and 53 (8.4%) of 628 patients with lower-extremity amputations underwent replantation. Mortality in patients with replantation was lower (5.6% vs. 19.6%, P < 0.001). Standardized mortality rate was lower for patients with replantation (0.71, 95% confidence interval, 0.20-1.21 vs. 0.94, 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.10; P = 0.26). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was significantly better for patients with replantation (34.0%; GOS score 5) as compared with patients without replantation (20.7%; GOS score 5; P < 0.001). In borderline patients (defined according to the orthopedic damage control principles), 91.5% received formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation and 8.5% underwent replantation. The rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation is higher when principles of damage control surgery are applied. The replantation rate in the upper extremity is higher than in the lower extremity. The less ISS and base excess and the higher blood pressure, hemoglobin value, and thromboplastin time are, the safer the decision for replantation seems to be.

Regarding operation time, blood loss and perioperative complications the 2 laparoscopic techniques for splenectomy do not differ significantly. Merely reduced material costs and a reduction of incisions were found in patients -operated with the hanging-spleen technique. Whether the hanging-spleen technique is the method of choice will have to be shown by further prospective studies.

We report the results of 22 infected nonunions treated by radical resection and bone transport technique according to Ilizarov with a minimal follow-up period of 2 years. This series involves four fractures of the femur diaphysis, ten at tibial level, four defects of the knee and four of the upper limb. The mean length of the bone defect was 7.7 cm. The mean time from the transport procedure to frame removal was 14.5 months. In 15 cases the docking site was reviewed to refresh the bone ends at the end of the transport procedure, of which eight had a bone graft performed. Five refractures were noticed at the docking site in the nonrevised group and one in the other group. Two of them were treated conservatively and four with a new external fixator. Consolidation was achieved in all but two nonunions at the knee level, which means a succesrate of 91%. The infection could be eradicated in all 22 patients. A revision of the docking site at the end of the bone transport procedure with or without bone grafting is recommended.

One third of the people aged 65 years and over fall every year, and 1–5% of these falls result in a fracture. For these people, history of fracture and surgery become a risk factor for recurrent falls. In osteoporotic patients, repeated fractures often require several osteosynthetic procedures within a short time frame. Despite the lack of biomechanical studies, clinical experience suggests that additional fractures adjacent to implants occur because of the difference in stiffness between the metallic implant and the osteoporotic bone. This requires customized fixation techniques to ensure stability.The technique was first performed in an 81-year old female patient presenting with a dislocated proximal femoral fracture at the tip of a previously implanted distal femoral nail (DFN), and non-union of the old fracture. For this technique, the DFN was advanced until it passed the proximal fracture, thereby reducing both fractures, while a lateral femoral nail (LFN), extra-long and 3 mm thicker than the DFN, was introduced and advanced distally. The LFN was implanted in a “kissing nail technique,” meaning the tips of the two nails were touching each other, and all fracture fragments were held in functional reduction. The DFN was slowly pulled backwards and fragment stability was maintained, while both nails passed the distal non-union.The Kissing Nail Technique allows simple, safe and fast reduction of all instable fragments, precise and easy positioning of the proximal entry point by the retrograde guide wire, a minimally invasive procedure, and stable fixation of a periprosthetic fracture.We found this new customized procedure accommodating to the unique anatomical features of a single patient, that can be applied as a strategy especially for osteoporotic patients with periprosthetic fractures.