To prevent hemophilic arthropathy, prophylactic treatment of children with severe hemophilia should be started before joint damage has occurred. However, treatment is expensive, and the burden of regular venipunctures in young children is high. With the aim of providing information on starting prophylaxis on the basis of individual patient characteristics, the effect of postponing prophylaxis on longterm arthropathy was studied in a cohort of 76 patients with severe hemophilia born between 1965 and 1985. The median age at first joint bleed was 2.2 years (range, 0.2-5.8). Prophylaxis was started at a median age of 6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4-9), and the median annual clotting factor use on prophylaxis was 1750 IU/kg/y (31 IU/kg/wk). Hemophilic arthropathy was measured by the Pettersson score (maximum, 78 points). At a median age of 19 years, the median Pettersson score was 7 points (IQR, 0-17). After 2 decades of follow-up, the Pettersson score was 8% higher (95% confidence interval, 1%-16%) for every year prophylaxis was postponed after the first joint bleed. This effect was independent of age at Pettersson score, age at first joint bleed, and prophylactic dose used. In conclusion, most patients have their first joint bleed after the age of 2 years. Patients who start prophylaxis soon after the first joint bleed show little arthropathy in adulthood. The longer the start of prophylaxis is postponed after the first joint bleed, the higher the risk of developing arthropathy.

Recently, the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL), a haemophilia-specific self-assessment questionnaire to assess a patient's self-perceived functional ability, was introduced and a limited pilot study warranted its further development. The present study finalizes the HAL and assesses the convergent and construct validity, as well as the internal consistency of its definitive version. Three questionnaires (HAL, Dutch-Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire) were completed by 127 patients with severe haemophilia (<1% clotting activity), as well as four performance tests (button test, 50 metre walking test, timed-up-and-go test and figure-8 walking test). After removal of 15 non-informative items from the provisional HAL, three components within the questionnaire were identified (upper extremity activities, basic lower extremity activities and complex lower extremity activities). The internal consistency of these components was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93-0.95), as was internal consistency for the seven domains of the HAL (alpha = 0.61-0.96). The convergent validity of the HAL when compared to the other two questionnaires was good (r = 0.47-0.84). The construct validity of the HAL when compared to the four performance tests was generally lower (r = 0.23-0.77). The final version of the HAL has good internal consistency and convergent validity and gives the clinician insight into a patient's self-perceived ability to perform activities of daily life. It is likely that self-assessment instruments (questionnaires) and performance tests consider different concepts of functional health status and it is therefore recommended that both types are included when clinicians assess a patient's functional abilities.

A multicentre study was performed to compare clotting factor use and outcome between on-demand and prophylactic treatment strategies for patients with severe haemophilia. Data on treatment and outcome of 49 Dutch patients with severe haemophilia, born 1970-80, primarily treated with prophylaxis, were compared with those of 106 French patients, who were primarily treated on demand. Dutch patients received intermediate dose prophylaxis, for a median duration of 12.7 years. Patients primarily treated with prophylaxis had fewer joint bleeds per year (median 2.8 vs. 11.5), a higher proportion of patients without joint bleeds (29% vs. 9%), lower clinical scores (median 2.0 vs. 8.0), and less arthropathy as measured by the Pettersson score (median 7 points vs. 16 points). Mean annual clotting factor use was equal at 1,488 +/- 783 IU kg-1 year-1 (mean +/- standard deviation) for patients primarily treated with prophylaxis and 1,612 +/- 1,442 IU kg-1 year-1 for patients primarily treated on demand. These findings suggest that, compared with a primarily on-demand treatment strategy, a primarily prophylactic treatment strategy leads to better outcome at equal treatment costs in young adults with severe haemophilia.

Several instruments can be used to evaluate the functional status of patients with haemophilia, but none of these instruments is specific for haemophilia. We developed a haemophilia-specific self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate and monitor a patient's perceived functional health status: the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL). In three separate but interlinked substudies, the questionnaire was constructed and tested for face, expert, and convergent validity, as well as internal consistency and patient-evaluated relevance. Items for the questionnaire were collected by interviewing 162 patients, using the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR). The items were combined to generate the first version of the questionnaire [HAL(1)]. This version was evaluated and commented on by two focus groups (patients and caregivers), and then the questionnaire was adapted on the basis of these comments, forming the final version, HAL(2). This version was then validated in a pilot study with 50 consecutive patients using the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurements Scales 2 (Dutch-AIMS2) and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) questionnaires. The HAL(2) showed good convergent validity (Pearson correlation 0.80-0.91; P < 0.01), and the internal consistency was good for six of the eight domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.83-0.95). Patients considered the content of the HAL to be more relevant to their situation than the content of the other questionnaires (P < 0.01). Three major factors (upper extremity function, lower extremity function, key activities/major problem activities) were identified by factor analysis. The questionnaire seems to be a useful tool to identify problematic activities as part of the functional health status of patients with haemophilia. The construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the HAL will be established in the future.

Introduction:The implementation of early long-term, regular clotting factor concentrate (CFC) replacement therapy ('prophylaxis') has made it possible to offer boys with haemophilia a near normal life. Many different regimens have reported favourable results, but the optimum treatment regimens have not been established and the cost of prophylaxis is very high. Both for optimizing treatment and reimbursement issues, there is a need to provide objective evidence of both short-and long-term results and benefits of prophylactic regimens. Aims: This report presents a critical review of outcome measures for use in the assessment of musculoskeletal health in persons with haemophilia according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). This framework considers structural and functional changes, activities and participation in a context of both personal and environmental factors. Methods: Results were generated by a combination of a critical review of available literature plus expert opinion derived from a two day consensus conference between 48 health care experts from different disciplines involved in haemophilia assessment and care. Outcome tools used in haemophilia were reviewed for reliability and validity in different patient groups and for resources required. Results and conclusion: Recommendations for choice of outcome tools were made according to the ICF domains, economic setting, and reason for use (clinical or research). The next step will be to identify a 'core' set of outcome measures for use in clinical care or studies evaluating treatment.

Outcome assessment in haemophilia is important to assess results of prophylactic treatment. Recently, the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed to assess early joint damage in children with haemophilia. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess reliability and explore validity of the HJHS in teenagers and young adults with haemophilia. Twenty-two patients with haemophilia (mean age 20.4, range 14-30, including 15 severe) were assessed by the HJHS1.0, Haemophilia Activities List (HAL), SF36 and self-evaluation was performed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. A subset of 12 patients were assessed by three physiotherapists to establish interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: ICC). Total HJHS1.0 scores were calculated without overall global gait. Validity was explored by the assessment of Pearson's correlation with all outcome parameters and recent Pettersson scores. Overall outcome was good, with median HJHS score of 5.5 of a maximum 144 (range 0-34), median patients' VAS of 96.5 and maximum scores for HAL and SF36 physical functioning for the majority of patients. Pettersson scores were low (median 3.5 of 78, N = 18). Interobserver reliability was good (ICC 0.84), with limits of agreement of ±7.2 points. ICC was unaffected by different score calculation methods. Exploration of validity in 22 patients showed weak correlations of HJHS scores with patients' VAS (0.33) and HAL (-0.40) and strong correlations with SF36-PF (-0.66) and Pettersson scores (0.86). These results suggest that interobserver reliability of the HJHS1.0 in teenagers and young adults with limited joint damage is excellent. Preliminary data on validity were similar or better than those in children.

Patients with severe haemophilia often experience pain caused by haemophilic arthropathy, and it is known that pain acts as a predictor of disability. The role of pain in functional limitations in these patients, however, has not been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to describe pain as experienced by patients with haemophilia and to address the role of pain in subsequent functional limitations. Seventy-eight adult patients (18-70 years) with severe haemophilia completed one questionnaire on pain and one on self-perceived functional abilities. Two-thirds of the patients suffered from more than one painful joint, the ankle being mentioned most frequently (n=43). Analgesics were used by 36% of the patients indicating having pain. Six of 10 most frequently mentioned pain descriptors were of evaluative nature. Evaluative qualities of pain were associated with pain intensity, which in turn was associated with the impact of pain on daily life. Pain outcomes, after adjusting for age and treatment modality, explained 3-22% of the variance in self-perceived functional abilities. Data on radiological joint damage (Pettersson scores) were retrieved for a subgroup of 28 younger patients on prophylaxis and no significant correlations with pain parameters were found. Over two-thirds of the patients with severe haemophilia had one or more painful joints. Pain plays a small, but significant role in functional limitations. In the identified subgroup, arthropathy, as measured by the Pettersson score, seemed to have no role in pain experience. Promoting analgesic use might decrease the impact of pain on functional limitations.

Articular contractures in haemophilia are impairments that can not be cured by means of physiotherapy because of the pathophysiology of the joint. Rehabilitation, however, tries to diminish the disabilities and prevent handicaps caused by the impairments. Physiotherapy aims at pain reduction by means of manual traction. Next to manual traction the intensive physiotherapy programme includes mobilization techniques, muscle strengthening exercises and stretching, joint stability training, postural and gait, training, and functional training. In all 50 haemophilia patients have undergone this intensive 4-week clinical rehabilitation programme. Data of 20 of these severe haemophilia patients show that the mean range of motion at the start of the rehabilitation period, after 4 weeks and after 5 years do not differ. In spite of progressing arthropathy after 5 years the activities of daily living (ADL), walking range and pain are equal or better according to 13 of 15 patients.