Background: Respiratory infections are common in acute stroke. Previous studies have found dysphagia is associated with respiratory infections. Of interest is whether patients who are ‘Nil by Mouth’ (NBM) and tube fed have higher risk of developing infections due to aspiration of bacteria-laden saliva or refluxed material than stroke patients who are fed orally. Methods: Prospective cohort of 330 ischemic stroke survivors were followed for 30 days and infections recorded. Results: 115 infections were treated with antibiotics; these included 51 respiratory infections. Incidence of infection in NBM tube-fed stroke patients (n = 74) was 69%, with 30 respiratory infections occurring in 74 patients who received enteral feeding after stroke. Logistic regression analysis showed tube feeding during admission was a significant risk for respiratory infection. We also saw a significant time-to-event effect with 73% (22/30) respiratory infections in tube-fed survivors diagnosed on days 2–4 after stroke, and 76% (39/51) of infections in all tube-fed survivors occurring by day 7 after stroke. Relevance to a theory of critical period of susceptibility to infection in acute stroke is discussed. Conclusions: NBM tube-fed survivors were unlikely to have aspirated anything other than saliva/secretions or reflux, yet experienced significantly higher rates of respiratory infections than survivors fed orally. Stringent oral care and measures to prevent reflux are potentially modifiable aspects of stroke management.

Dysphagia has previously been reported in the inflammatory myopathies (IMs): inclusion body myositis (IBM), dermatomyositis (DM), and polymyositis (PM). Patients report coughing, choking, and bolus sticking in the pharynx. Myotomy has been the treatment of choice, with variable success reported. We sought to determine underlying causes of dysphagia in IM patients using instrumental evaluation. Eighteen subjects participated in the study: four with DM, six with PM, and eight with IBM. They underwent simultaneous videofluoroscopy and manometry, yielding 214 swallows for analysis regarding function of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), swallow initiation, hyolaryngeal excursion, and pharyngeal residue. Penetration and aspiration were also recorded. UES failed to relax in two participants. High incidence of pharyngeal dysphagia was noted; 72% of participants demonstrated abnormalities, including delayed swallow initiation (24%), decreased hyolaryngeal excursion (22%), pyriform residue (17%), and penetration (22%). Dysphagia in IM patients appears to be more due to impaired muscle contraction and reduced hyolaryngeal excursion than the often held belief of failed UES relaxation. The distinction between mechanisms causing patients' dysphagia should be examined, particularly if CP myotomy is being considered as it may be contraindicated for patients with normal UES relaxation. More studies investigating IM patients pre- and post-myotomy are needed.

No abstract

This study compared self-reported incidence and prevalence of dysphagia in inflammatory myopathy diseases with instrumental data from videofluoroscopy in a cohort of 18 patients with inflammatory myopathies (inclusion body myositis, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis). We found a high self-report of incidence of dysphagia and demonstrated that symptoms described by the patients follow a characteristic pattern. We conclude that there is a high incidence of dysphagia in all three of the inflammatory myopathies. Questions about swallowing should routinely be included in inflammatory myopathy patient examinations in order to appropriately refer patients for further investigation of their swallowing function and avoid the complications associated with dysphagia.