Abstract-Based on purely spectral-domain prior knowledge taken from the remote sensing (RS) literature, an original spectral (fuzzy) rule-based per-pixel classifier is proposed. Requiring no training and supervision to run, the proposed spectral rule-based system is suitable for the preliminary classification (primal sketch, in the Marr sense) of Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper and Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus images calibrated into planetary reflectance (albedo) and at-satellite temperature. The classification system consists of a modular hierarchical top-down processing structure, which is adaptive to image statistics, computationally efficient, and easy to modify, augment, or scale to other sensors' spectral properties, like those of the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer and of the Satellite Pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT-4 and -5). As output, the proposed system detects a set of meaningful and reliable fuzzy spectral layers (strata) consistent (in terms of one-to-one or manyto-one relationships) with land cover classes found in levels I and II of the U.S. Geological Survey classification scheme. Although kernel spectral categories (e.g., strong vegetation) are detected without requiring any reference sample, their symbolic meaning is intermediate between those (low) of clusters and segments and those (high) of land cover classes (e.g., forest). This means that the application domain of the kernel spectral strata is by no means alternative to RS data clustering, image segmentation, and land cover classification. Rather, prior knowledge-based kernel spectral categories are naturally suitable for driving stratified application-specific classification, clustering, or segmentation of RS imagery that could involve training and supervision. The efficacy and robustness of the proposed rule-based system are tested in two operational RS image classification problems.Index Terms-Data clustering, fuzzy rule, fuzzy set (FS), generalization capability, image classification, image color analysis, image segmentation, one-class classifier, prior knowledge, remotely sensed imagery, spectral information, supervised and unsupervised learning from finite data.

No abstract

For pt.I see ibid., p.775-85. In part I an equivalence between the concepts of fuzzy clustering and soft competitive learning in clustering algorithms is proposed on the basis of the existing literature. Moreover, a set of functional attributes is selected for use as dictionary entries in the comparison of clustering algorithms. In this paper, five clustering algorithms taken from the literature are reviewed, assessed and compared on the basis of the selected properties of interest. These clustering models are (1) self-organizing map (SOM); (2) fuzzy learning vector quantization (FLVQ); (3) fuzzy adaptive resonance theory (fuzzy ART); (4) growing neural gas (GNG); (5) fully self-organizing simplified adaptive resonance theory (FOSART). Although our theoretical comparison is fairly simple, it yields observations that may appear parodoxical. First, only FLVQ, fuzzy ART, and FOSART exploit concepts derived from fuzzy set theory (e.g., relative and/or absolute fuzzy membership functions). Secondly, only SOM, FLVQ, GNG, and FOSART employ soft competitive learning mechanisms, which are affected by asymptotic misbehaviors in the case of FLVQ, i.e., only SOM, GNG, and FOSART are considered effective fuzzy clustering algorithms.

No abstract

Clustering algorithms aim at modeling fuzzy (i.e., ambiguous) unlabeled patterns efficiently. Our goal is to propose a theoretical framework where the expressive power of clustering systems can be compared on the basis of a meaningful set of common functional features. Part I of this paper reviews the following issues related to clustering approaches found in the literature: relative (probabilistic) and absolute (possibilistic) fuzzy membership functions and their relationships to the Bayes rule, batch and on-line learning, prototype editing schemes, growing and pruning networks, modular network architectures, topologically perfect mapping, ecological nets and neuro-fuzziness. From this discussion an equivalence between the concepts of fuzzy clustering and soft competitive learning in clustering algorithms is proposed as a unifying framework in the comparison of clustering systems. Moreover, a set of functional attributes is selected for use as dictionary entries in the comparison of clustering algorithms, which is the subject of part II of this paper.

Periodic monitoring of biodiversity changes at a landscape scale constitutes a key issue for conservation managers. Earth observation (EO) data offer a potential solution, through direct or indirect mapping of species or habitats. Most national and international programs rely on the use of land cover (LC) and/or land use (LU) classification systems. Yet, these are not as clearly relatable to biodiversity in comparison to habitat classifications, and provide less scope for monitoring. While a conversion from LC/LU classification to habitat classification can be of great utility, differences in definitions and criteria have so far limited the establishment of a unified approach for such translation between these two classification systems.Focusing on five Mediterranean NATURA 2000 sites, this paper considers the scope for three of the most commonly used global LC/LU taxonomies-CORINE Land Cover, the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) land cover classification system (LCCS) and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme to be translated to habitat taxonomies. Through both quantitative and expert knowledge based qualitative analysis of selected taxonomies, FAO-LCCS turns out to be the best candidate to cope with the complexity of habitat description and provides a framework for EO and in situ data integration for habitat mapping, reducing uncertainties and class overlaps and bridging the gap between LC/LU and habitats domains for 123Landscape Ecol (2013) 28:905-930 DOI 10.1007 landscape monitoring-a major issue for conservation. This study also highlights the need to modify the FAO-LCCS hierarchical class description process to permit the addition of attributes based on class-specific expert knowledge to select multi-temporal (seasonal) EO data and improve classification. An application of LC/LU to habitat mapping is provided for a coastal Natura 2000 site with high classification accuracy as a result.

No abstract

To support decisions relating to the use and conservation of protected areas and surrounds, the EU-fundedBIOdiversity multi-SOurce monitoring System: from Space TO Species (BIO SOS) project has developedthe Earth Observation Data for HAbitat Monitoring (EODHaM) system for consistent mapping and mon-itoring of biodiversity. The EODHaM approach has adopted the Food and Agriculture Organization LandCover Classification System (LCCS) taxonomy and translates mapped classes to General Habitat Cate-gories (GHCs) from which Annex I habitats (EU Habitats Directive) can be defined. The EODHaM systemuses a combination of pixel and object-based procedures. The 1st and 2nd stages use earth observation(EO) data alone with expert knowledge to generate classes according to the LCCS taxonomy (Levels 1 to3 and beyond). The 3rd stage translates the final LCCS classes into GHCs from which Annex I habitat typemaps are derived. An additional module quantifies changes in the LCCS classes and their components,indices derived from earth observation, object sizes and dimensions and the translated habitat maps (i.e.,GHCs or Annex I). Examples are provided of the application of EODHaM system elements to protectedsites and their surrounds in Italy, Wales (UK), the Netherlands, Greece, Portugal and India