The replication frequency of IncFH plasmids is regulated through the availability of a rate-limiting protein, RepA.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is post‐transcriptionally controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, that binds to the leader region in the RepA mRNA, CopT, and ultimately inhibits the synthesis of the replication initiator protein RepA. We present results demonstrating that CopA controls RepA synthesis indirectly. A reading frame for a 24 amino acid leader peptide (Tap, translational activator peptide) is located in the region between the copA and repA genes. A translational fusion between the tap and lacZ genes was used to demonstrate that tap is translated and controlled by CopA. Stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA) introduced at three different positions within the tap gene led to a severe decrease in repA expression. Specific suppression of the stop codons reversed the effect. This indicates that tap translation is required for RepA synthesis. Phylogenetic comparisons between IncFII‐like plasmids, together with previous in vitro and in vivo results (Ohman and Wagner, 1989, 1991), suggest that a stable RNA stem‐loop structure sequesters the repA ribosome binding site irrespective of CopA‐CopT duplex formation. The results presented here show that ribosomes translating the tap reading frame have to terminate close to the start codon of repA to permit reinitiation (direct translational coupling), and that transient disruption of the inhibitory RNA stem‐loop is insufficient for activation of repA translation. The possibility that direct translational coupling is required because of a suboptimal repA RBS cannot be excluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is regulated by an antisense RNA, CopA, which inhibits the synthesis of the rate‐limiting initiator protein RepA. The inhibition requires an interaction between the antisense RNA and its target, CopT, in the leader of the RepA mRNA. This binding reaction has previously been studied in vitro, and the formation of a complete RNA duplex between the two RNAs has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Here we investigate whether complete duplex formation is required for CopA‐mediated inhibition in vivo. A mutated copA gene was constructed, encoding a truncated CopA which is impaired in its ability to form a complete CopA/CopT duplex, but which forms a primary binding intermediate (the ‘kissing complex’). The mutated CopA species (S‐CopA) mediated incompatibility against wild‐type R1 plasmids and inhibited RepA‐LacZ fusion protein synthesis. Northern blot, primer extension and S1 analyses indicated that S‐CopA did not form a complete duplex with CopT in vivo since bands corresponding to RNase III cleavage products were missing. An in vitro analysis supported the same conclusion. These data suggest that formation of the ‘kissing complex’ suffices to inhibit RepA synthesis, and that complete CopA/CopT duplex formation is not required. The implications of these findings are discussed.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, that inhibits the synthesis of the replication initiator protein, RepA, at the post-transcriptional level. This inhibition is indirect and affects translation of a leader peptide reading frame (tap). Translation of tap is required for repA translation (Blomberg et al., 1992). Here we asked whether an RNA stem-loop sequestering the repA ribosome-binding site blocks tap translation-independent repA expression. Destabilization of this structure resulted in tap-independent RepA synthesis, concomitant with a loss of CopA-mediated inhibition; thus, CopA acts at the level of tap translation. Structure probing of RepA mRNAs confirmed that the introduced mutations induced a local destabilization in the repA ribosome-binding site stem-loop. An increased spacing between the repA Shine-Dalgarno region and the start codon permitted even higher repA expression. In Incl alpha/IncB plasmids, an RNA pseudoknot acts as an activator for rep translation. We suggest that the regulatory pathway in plasmid R1 does not involve an activator RNA pseudoknot.

We have analyzed the cis-acting sequences that regulate rRNA gene (rDNA) replication in Tetrahymena thermophila. The macronucleus of this ciliated protozoan contains 9,000 copies of a 21-kbp minichromosome in the form of a palindrome comprising two copies of the rDNA. These are derived from a single chromosomally integrated copy during conjugation through selective amplification and are maintained by replicating once per cell cycle during vegetative growth. We have developed a transformation vector and carried out a deletion analysis to determine the minimal sequences required for replication, amplification, and/or stable maintenance of the rDNA molecule. Using constructs containing progressively longer deletions, we show that only a small portion (ϳ900 bp) of the rDNA is needed for extrachromosomal replication and stable maintenance of this molecule. This core region is very near but does not include the rRNA transcription initiation site or its putative promoter, indicating that replication is not dependent on normal rRNA transcription. It includes two nearly identical nuclease-sensitive domains (D1 and D2), one of which (D1) corresponds to the physical origin of replication determined previously. Deletion of both domains abolishes replication, whereas deletion of either domain allows the molecules to replicate, indicating that only one domain is required. In addition to this core region, we have found several DNA segments, including a tandem array of a 21-nucleotide repeat (type II repeats) and sequences within the rRNA coding region, that play distinctive and important roles in maintaining the rDNA at a high copy number.