No abstract

Melanism in Lepidoptera, either industrial or in mimicry, is one of the most commonly cited examples of natural selection [1] [2]. Despite extensive studies of the frequency and maintenance of melanic genes in insect populations [1] [2], there has been little work on the underlying molecular mechanisms. Nowhere is butterfly melanism more striking than in the Eastern Tiger Swallowtail (Papilio glaucus) of North America [3] [4] [5]. In this species, females can be either yellow (wild type) or black (melanic). The melanic form is a Batesian mimic of the distasteful Pipevine Swallowtail (Battus philenor), which is also black in overall color. Melanism in P. glaucus is controlled by a single Y-linked (female) black gene [6]. Melanic females, therefore, always have melanic daughters. Black melanin replaces the background yellow in melanic females. Here, we show that the key enzyme involved is N-beta-alanyl-dopamine-synthase (BAS), which shunts dopamine from the melanin pathway into the production of the yellow color pigment papiliochrome and also provides products for cuticle sclerotization. In melanic females, this enzyme is suppressed, leading to abnormal melanization of a formerly yellow area, and wing scale maturation is also delayed in the same area. This raises the possibility that either reduced BAS activity itself is preventing scale sclerotization (maturation) or, in contrast, that the delay in scale maturation precludes expression of BAS at the correct stage. Together, these data show how changes in expression of a single gene product could result in multiple wing color phenotypes. The implications for the genetic control of mimicry in other Lepidoptera are discussed.

Hormonal mechanisms underlie many life-history traits and their interactions. We studied the role of ecdysteroids with regard to wing pattern and development time of the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Ecdysteroid titers and sensitivity to ecdysone injection were assayed for two-trait selected lines (ventral eyespot size and development time concurrently). These two traits are genetically and phenotypically coupled, having a common endocrinal basis. Two-trait selection had been applied both antagonistically (opposite the correlation) and synergistically (in the same direction as the correlation). Although selected lines had diverged most in eyespot size, the widest differences in timing of ecdysteroid titers were observed between the development time selection regimes; fast selected lines had an earlier hormonal increase after pupation than slow selected lines (even when corrected for differential pupal times). This endocrine peak was also earlier for females than for males. Furthermore, sensitivity to ecdysone injection as measured by a subsequent decrease in pupal time was significantly lower for slow selected lines than for fast or unselected lines. We conclude that the observed response in eyespot size to artificial selection must have been achieved via alteration of, or selection on, other developmental mechanisms, because the dynamics of the alternative, hormonal, pathway were dictated by development time selection. The developmental system is flexible enough to allow evolution in directions opposing the correlation between wing pattern and developmental time, and responses to selection are not constrained by a shared hormonal system.

No abstract

We use an outcrossed stock and selected lines of Bicyclus anynana in combination with measurements and manipulations of ecdysteroid hormones in early pupae to examine the regulation of eyespot size in adult butterflies. The eyespots on the ventral wing surfaces express adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to the dry-wet seasonal environments of the butterflies. Larvae reared at low or high temperatures produce adults with small or large ventral eyespots, respectively. Our experiments examine the role of ecdysteroids in mediating this phenotypic plasticity. Higher titers of ecdysteroids shortly after pupation yield larger ventral wing eyespots. There is an uncoupling of the ventral eyespots and those on the dorsal forewing. The latter do not show phenotypic plasticity. They show very little response to rearing temperature, and variation in their size is not associated with differences in the dynamics of ecdysteroids in early pupae. A testable hypothesis in terms of the distribution of hormone receptors in the developmental "organizers" or foci of the eyespots is proposed to account for how some eyespots express plasticity while others do not.