Plasma concentrations of codeine and its demethylated metabolite, morphine, were determined after single and repeated oral administration of codeine. Twelve healthy volunteers received two doses of codeine 60 mg, 2.8 h apart. In order to achieve steady-state conditions codeine 60 mg was then taken every 8 h for a further five doses. The plasma concentrations of codeine and morphine after the first, second and seventh doses were analyzed by GC-MS. The maximum plasma concentrations of codeine and morphine were reached about 1 h after administration and this time interval did not change on repeated administration. The peak plasma codeine was higher after the second dose of codeine than after the first and the concentration resembled that at steady-state. For morphine, the plasma concentration did not increase significantly after the second dose. Both after a single dose and during steady-state the plasma concentration of morphine was only 2-3% of that of codeine. It seems unlikely that morphine plays a significant role in the analgesic efficacy of single or repeated doses of codeine.
The ability of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase which catalyzes formation of prostaglandins appears to be central to the mechanisms involved in aspirin sensitivity. We have investigated whether the plasma levels of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and its main metabolite salicylic acid (SA) at the time of intolerance reactions correspond with the concentrations required for enzyme inhibition in vitro. Twelve aspirin-sensitive and 15 aspirin-tolerant subjects were followed during provocation with aspirin. ASA and SA concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. After oral provocation (up to 460 mg cumulative dose), the levels of ASA and SA in plasma were equivalent in aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant subjects. For the aspirin-sensitive subjects, at the time of adverse reaction, the concentration range was 2.9-33.3 microM for ASA and 18.1-245 microM for SA. Oral provocation with sodium salicylate yielding 10-fold higher SA levels did not elicit intolerance reactions. Statistically significantly lower levels of ASA and SA (P < or = 0.01) evoked airway obstruction, as compared with merely extrapulmonary symptoms. Bronchial absorption of aspirin was found after inhalation of lysine-aspirin and was comparable in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. In three aspirin-sensitive subjects who developed airway obstruction, the plasma levels for ASA and SA were 0.9-2.6 microM and 0.0-6.7 microM, respectively. In conclusion, the plasma levels of ASA reached at the time of a positive reaction are of the magnitude known to inhibit cyclo-oxygenases. Neither differences in bioavailability of ASA nor the formation of SA seems to contribute to the aspirin-elicited reactions.
The pharmacokinetic parameters and oral bioavailability of the antiarrhythmic drug verapamil were determined in six patients with atrial fibrillation. Plasma samples were taken following i.v. injection of verapamil 10 mg (Isoptin 2 ml), and oral verapamil 80 mg (Isoptin 2 tablets of 40 mg). Verapamil and its N-demethylated metabolite, norverapamil, were analyzed to 1 ng/ml plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using deuterated standards. Following intravenous injection, the disposition of verapamil followed a biexponential pattern with a fast distribution phase and a slower elimination of phase (t 1/2 beta = 5.79 h), corresponding to a plasma clearance of 0.26 l/kg/h. After oral administration, only an elimination phase was evident, with the same elimination rate (t 1/2 beta = 5.53 h). The oral bioavailability was 10.5% +/- 7.5%. The norverapamil formed after i.v. and oral administration of verapamil had plasma half-lives of 5.86 h and 6.77 h, respectively. The elimination of verapamil in patients with atria fibrillation was decreased compared to that in healthy young volunteers and the oral bioavailability was lower. Very good correlation between the percentage reduction in heart rate and the log plasma concentration of verapamil was found in every patient during the elimination phase, irrespective of the route of administration. There was also a high correlation when the plasma concentration -- effect data from the patients were pooled (r = 0.59, n = 71; p less than 0.0005).
The pharmacokinetics of baclofen analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry in a massive intoxication case (baclofen 1230 mg orally) is presented. In contrast to earlier reports, no increase in the plasma half-life of elimination of baclofen could be observed (t1/2 = 4.58 hours). On the contrary, we found an increased plasma clearance (Clpl = 0.368 l/kg) in this highly intoxicated patient compared to the kinetics usually found in healthy subjects.
The pharmacokinetics of the new lipid-lowering drug bezafibrate has been investigated in patients with impaired renal function and hyperlipoproteinaemia. 12 patients received a single oral dose of bezafibrate 300 mg. Plasma and urine samples were collected and bezafibrate was analyzed by gas chromatography. Eight of the patients had moderately impaired renal function, with a creatinine clearance between 20 and 40 ml/min; the mean plasma half-life of bezafibrate in them was 7.8 +3.9 h (SD) and the plasma clearance was 0.03 +0.02 1/kg . h. Three of the patients had a creatinine clearance greater than 40 ml/min; in them the plasma half-life was shorter, 4.6 +1.2 h, and the plasma clearance was higher, 0.06 +0.01 1/kg . h. The slowest elimination of bezafibrate was found in a patient with a creatinine clearance of only 13 ml/min. This patient had a plasma half-life of 20.l h, which is ten times longer than has been reported in healthy volunteers. Thus, when treating hyperlipoproteinaemia in patients with impaired renal function, the dosage of bezafibrate must be individualized because of its reduced renal elimination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.