Fundamento: A patologia subjacente da ectasia da artéria coronária (EC) isolada não foi totalmente elucidada. Objetivo: Nosso objetivo foi examinar a relação entre o índice de inflamação imune sistêmica (Sıı), que corresponde à multiplicação da razão neutrófilos-linfócitos (RNL) e as contagens de plaquetas, e EC isolada. Método: A população do estudo retrospectivo incluiu 200 pacientes com EC isolada, 200 consecutivos com doença arterial coronariana obstrutiva e 200 consecutivos com angiografia coronária normal. Um valor de p bicaudal <0,05 foi considerado significativo. Resultados: Sıı, RNL, razão plaqueta-linfócito (RPL) e razão monócito-colesterol de lipoproteína de alta densidade (MHR) foram significativamente maiores no grupo EC em comparação com os outros grupos (todos p<0,001). Na análise multivariada, Sıı (p<0,001, OR = 1,005, IC 95% =1,004-1,005) foi considerado um preditor independente de EC isolada. Na análise da curva Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Sıı teve uma área sob a curva maior em comparação com RNL, RPL e MHR. O valor de Sıı >517,35 tem 79% de sensibilidade, 76% de especificidade para a predição do EC [AUC: 0,832, (p<0,001)]. Sıı teve correlação significativa com o número de artérias coronárias ectásicas e classificação de Markis (r: 0,214 p=0,002; r:-0,195, p=0,006, respectivamente). Conclusão: Até onde sabemos, este é o primeiro estudo em que Sıı foi significativamente associado à presença isolada de EC e gravidade anatômica.

As inflammation plays a significant role in the development of coronary artery disease, we hypothesized that there may be a relation between the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) and saphenous vein graft disease (SVGD). The study population consisted of 716 consecutive patients who underwent elective coronary angiography (CAG) >1 year after bypass grafting. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the extent of SVG patency. SII value was significantly higher in the SVGD(+) group compared with the SVGD(−) group ( P < .001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, SII ( P < .001, odds ratio (OR) = 3.27, 95% CI = 1.94–5.65) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ( P < .001, OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.59–3.11) were found to be independent predictors of SVGD. An SII value of >935 (x103/ml) has 89.2% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity for the prediction of the SVGD, and an NLR value of >4.15 has 54.6% sensitivity and 68.5% specificity for the prediction of the SVGD. The AUC of SII was found to be greater than the AUC of NLR ( P = .002), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ( P = .009), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) ( P = .013), MPV ( P = .011), and C-reactive protein (CRP) ( P = .034) in predicting SVGD. In conclusion, we demonstrated that SII, which is among the new inflammation indexes, is a more reliable predictor in determining SVGD than the NLR, PLR, and LMR.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether a simple and easily calculated parameter such as monocyte/ HDL ratio (MHR) may be used in predicting non-dipper (NDHT)-dipper HT (DHT) end organ damage. METHODS: 70 NDHT and 73 DHT patient groups were included in the study according to ambulatory blood pressure screening results. Basic laboratory parameters and spot urine samples were evaluated. Transthoracic echocardiography and ophthalmological examination were performed for end-organ damages. RESULTS: The MHR among the groups was higher in the NDHT group; which was statistically signifi cant (p ≤0.001). In the NDHT group, albumin, creatinine, protein values, protein/creatinine ratio in the spot urine were signifi cantly higher than in the DHT group (p ≤0.05). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and retinopathy were also more frequently observed in the NDHT group (p ≤0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). MHR in patients with LVH and retinopathy was signifi cantly higher than in those without these complications (p =0.001). CONCLUSION: Easy to use, non-invasive and simple calculation, MHR can be used to predict end organ damage in hypertensive cases, and can be also used to distinguish between DHT/NDHT groups. This data supports the role of infl ammation (Tab. 7, Ref. 14).

No abstract