Here, two studies seek to characterize a parsimonious common‐denominator personality structure with optimal cross‐cultural replicability. Personality differences are observed in all human populations and cultures, but lexicons for personality attributes contain so many distinctions that parsimony is lacking. Models stipulating the most important attributes have been formulated by experts or by empirical studies drawing on experience in a very limited range of cultures. Factor analyses of personality lexicons of nine languages of diverse provenance (Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Turkish, Greek, Polish, Hungarian, Maasai, and Senoufo) were examined, and their common structure was compared to that of several prominent models in psychology. A parsimonious bivariate model showed evidence of substantial convergence and ubiquity across cultures. Analyses involving key markers of these dimensions in English indicate that they are broad dimensions involving the overlapping content of the interpersonal circumplex, models of communion and agency, and morality/warmth and competence. These “Big Two” dimensions—Social Self‐Regulation and Dynamism—provide a common‐denominator model involving the two most crucial axes of personality variation, ubiquitous across cultures. The Big Two might serve as an umbrella model serving to link diverse theoretical models and associated research literatures.

Findings from analyses of self-descriptions by 631 native speakers of Turkish, using 498 familiar Turkish person-descriptive adjectives, are compared to those of Saucier (1997), who analyzed 500 familiar English adjectives. In the total item pools in both studies, variants of the English/German `Big-Five' factors were recovered, along with a broad Attractiveness factor and another factor composed of items of extremely low endorsement rates. Moreover, in both studies when the item pools were restricted to terms that are less pejorative and more clearly related to personality traits, again variants of the Big-Five factors were recovered. These latter ®ndings replicate those from Somer and Goldberg (1999), who analyzed Turkish synonym clusters rather than single person-descriptive adjectives. We discuss some of the pitfalls of comparative studies of personality lexicons, and suggest some procedures for reconciling diverse ®ndings.

No abstract

This description of the Turkish lexical project reports some initial findings on the structure of Turkish personality-related variables. In addition, it provides evidence on the effects of target evaluative homogeneity vs. heterogeneity (e.g., samples of well-liked target individuals vs. samples of both liked and disliked targets) on the resulting factor structures, and thus it provides a first test of the conclusions reached by D. Peabody and L. R. Goldberg (1989) using English trait terms. In 2 separate studies, and in 2 types of data sets, clear versions of the Big Five factor structure were found. And both studies replicated and extended the findings of Peabody and Goldberg; virtually orthogonal factors of relatively equal size were found in the homogeneous samples, and a more highly correlated set of factors with relatively large Agreeableness and Conscientiousness dimensions was found in the heterogeneous samples.

Findings from the present study indicate that NSSI is a common form of behavior among adolescent youth. There is, however, considerable heterogeneity among those with NSSI histories, with about 40 % at particularly high risk for ongoing distress, future acts of intentional self-harm, and suicidal behavior.

Findings from analyses of self‐descriptions by 631 native speakers of Turkish, using 498 familiar Turkish person‐descriptive adjectives, are compared to those of Saucier (1997), who analyzed 500 familiar English adjectives. In the total item pools in both studies, variants of the English/German ‘Big‐Five’ factors were recovered, along with a broad Attractiveness factor and another factor composed of items of extremely low endorsement rates. Moreover, in both studies when the item pools were restricted to terms that are less pejorative and more clearly related to personality traits, again variants of the Big‐Five factors were recovered. These latter findings replicate those from Somer and Goldberg (1999), who analyzed Turkish synonym clusters rather than single person‐descriptive adjectives. We discuss some of the pitfalls of comparative studies of personality lexicons, and suggest some procedures for reconciling diverse findings. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This article examines the six largest dimensions of the Turkish personality lexicon, as derived from the personality-descriptive terms of Goldberg and Somer's (2000) data set. The six Turkish lexical factors show close correspondences of content to all six dimensions observed in several other languages. In a new data set, the authors then correlate factor scores representing these indigenous Turkish dimensions with the scales of the HEXACO Personality Inventory, which operationalize the six cross-language factors. Results show a pattern of strong convergent and weak discriminant correlations. Overall, findings suggest that the cross-language six-dimensional structure of personality description does generalize to the Turkish lexicon. The Turkish structure also reveals some interesting emic features, particularly with regard to the content of the Openness to Experience factor.

No abstract