Cohesin is present in almost all active enhancer regions, where it is associated with transcription factors. Cohesin frequently colocalizes with CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor), affecting genomic stability, expression and epigenetic homeostasis. Cohesin subunits are mutated in cancer, but CTCF/cohesin-binding sites (CBSs) in DNA have not been examined for mutations. Here we report frequent mutations at CBSs in cancers displaying a mutational signature where mutations in A•T base pairs predominate. Integration of whole-genome sequencing data from 213 colorectal cancer (CRC) samples and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-exo) data identified frequent point mutations at CBSs. In contrast, CRCs showing an ultramutator phenotype caused by defects in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase ɛ (POLE) displayed significantly fewer mutations at and adjacent to CBSs. Analysis of public data showed that multiple cancer types accumulate CBS mutations. CBSs are a major mutational hotspot in the noncoding cancer genome.

CHEK2 (previously known as "CHK2") is a cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates p53 and BRCA1 in response to DNA damage. A protein-truncating mutation, 1100delC in exon 10, which abolishes the kinase function of CHEK2, has been found in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and in those with a cancer phenotype that is suggestive of LFS, including breast cancer. In the present study, we found that the frequency of 1100delC was 2.0% among an unselected population-based cohort of 1,035 patients with breast cancer. This was slightly, but not significantly (P=.182), higher than the 1.4% frequency found among 1,885 population control subjects. However, a significantly elevated frequency was found among those 358 patients with a positive family history (11/358 [3.1%]; odds ratio [OR] 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-4.63; P=.021, compared with population controls). Furthermore, patients with bilateral breast cancer were sixfold more likely to be 1100delC carriers than were patients with unilateral cancer (95% CI 1.87-20.32; P=.007). Analysis of the 1100delC variant in an independent set of 507 patients with familial breast cancer with no BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations confirmed a significantly elevated frequency of 1100delC (28/507 [5.5%]; OR 4.2; 95% CI 2.4-7.2; P=.0002), compared with controls, with a high frequency also seen in patients with only a single affected first-degree relative (18/291 [6.2%]). Finally, tissue microarray analysis indicated that breast tumors from patients with 1100delC mutations show reduced CHEK2 immunostaining. The results suggest that CHEK2 acts as a low-penetrance tumor-suppressor gene in breast cancer and that it makes a significant contribution to familial clustering of breast cancer-including families with only two affected relatives, which are more common than families that include larger numbers of affected women.

The identification of somatic activating mutations in JAK21–4 and in the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL)5 in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients led to the clinical development of JAK2 kinase inhibitors6,7. JAK2 inhibitor therapy improves MPN-associated splenomegaly and systemic symptoms, but does not significantly reduce or eliminate the MPN clone in most MPN patients. We therefore sought to characterize mechanisms by which MPN cells persist despite chronic JAK2 inhibition. Here we show that JAK2 inhibitor persistence is associated with reactivation of JAK-STAT signaling and with heterodimerization between activated JAK2 and JAK1/TYK2, consistent with activation of JAK2 in trans by other JAK kinases. Further, this phenomenon is reversible, such that JAK2 inhibitor withdrawal is associated with resensitization to JAK2 kinase inhibitors and with reversible changes in JAK2 expression. We saw increased JAK2 heterodimerization and sustained JAK2 activation in cell lines, murine models, and patients treated with JAK2 inhibitors. RNA interference and pharmacologic studies demonstrate that JAK2 inhibitor persistent cells remain dependent on JAK2 protein expression. Consequently, therapies that result in JAK2 degradation retain efficacy in persistent cells and may provide additional benefit to patients with JAK2-dependent malignancies treated with JAK2 inhibitors.

IntroductionOur understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies, most notably acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), has largely resulted from the identification and characterization of recurrent chromosomal translocations. 1 However, in many patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), recurrent clonal cytogenetic abnormalities are not observed. More recently, DNA resequencing studies of candidate genes, 2 gene families, 3,4 and the cancer genome 5 in MPN, CMML, and AML have identified somatic mutations in FLT3, 6 JAK2, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]14,15 and the RAS family of oncogenes. 16 These discoveries demonstrate activation of signal transduction pathways is a common pathogenic event in myeloid malignancies and have led to the development of molecularly targeted therapies. However, with the exception of CML, these therapies have yet to substantively improve outcomes for patients with myeloid malignancies. 17,18 This may reflect insufficient target inhibition, or, alternatively, this may indicate incomplete dependence on these activated pathways resulting from the presence of additional somatic mutations with prognostic, therapeutic, and biologic relevance.The role of TET (Ten-Eleven Translocation) family gene members in hematopoietic transformation was thought to be restricted to the involvement of TET1 as a translocation partner MLL-translocated AML, until the recent identification of inactivating mutations in TET2 in MPN and MDS patients. 19 We therefore sought to evaluate a large set of MPN, CMML, and AML samples for somatic TET2 alterations. We sequenced all coding exons of TET2 in 408 paired tumor/normal samples and then assessed the frequency of somatic TET2 mutations in 606 patients with MPN, CMML, and AML. We also investigated whether deletion or epigenetic inactivation of TET2 are observed in MPN and evaluated MPN patients for somatic mutations in TET1 and TET3. Methods Copy number analysis of TET1, TET2, and TET3A total of 207 MPN tumor samples were analyzed using Affymetrix 250K StyI Arrays. 20 The JAK2V617F-mutant AML cell lines HEL and SET2 were analyzed using Affymetrix 6.0 SNP Arrays. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reactionMethylation of 2 CpG islands in the promoter region of TET2 was assessed in 37 MPN patients and 4 JAK2V617F-positive leukemia cell lines (SET2, MBO2, HEL, UKE1). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed as previously described (primers are listed in supplemental Table 1). 21 StatisticsStatistical analyses were performed using MedCalc (MedCalc). Results and discussionSequence analysis of all coding exons of TET2 in 408 paired tumor/normal samples identified 8 frameshift, 12 nonsense, and 37 nonsynonymous alterations not present in dbSNP. Analysis of germ line DNA distinguished between 31 somatic missense mutations and 6 unannotated SNPs (Table 1; supplemental Figure 1); all unannotated SNPs were observed in matched normal tissue in at least 2 samples. Al...

Key Points • A gene expression profile consistent with activated JAK2 signaling is seen in all MPN patients, including in patients with CALR mutations. • Transcriptional profiling discriminates subsets of MPNs based on JAK2V617F allele burden and on the presence of CALR and TET2 mutations. Genomic studies have identified somatic alterations in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) patients, including JAK2 mutations in the majority of MPN patients and CALR mutations in JAK2-negative MPN patients. However, the role of JAK-STAT pathway activation in different MPNs, and in patients without JAK2 mutations, has not been definitively delineated. We used expression profiling, single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, and mutational profiling to investigate a well-characterized cohort of MPN patients. MPN patients with homozygous JAK2V617F mutations were characterized by a distinctive transcriptional profile. Notably, a transcriptional signature consistent with activated JAK2 signaling is seen in all MPN patients regardless of clinical phenotype or mutational status. In addition, the activated JAK2 signature was present in patients with somatic CALR mutations. Conversely, we identified a gene expression signature of CALR mutations; this signature was significantly enriched in JAK2-mutant MPN patients consistent with a shared mechanism of transformation by JAK2 and CALR mutations. We also identified a transcriptional signature of TET2 mutations in MPN patent samples. Our data indicate that MPN patients, regardless of diagnosis or JAK2 mutational status, are characterized by a distinct gene expression signature with upregulation of JAK-STAT target genes, demonstrating the central importance of the JAK-STAT pathway in MPN pathogenesis. (Blood. 2014;123(22):e123-e133) Introduction The Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are hematopoietic disorders characterized by clonal expansion of mature myeloid elements. These include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Genomic analysis of the MPNs has shown frequent mutational events in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway including JAK2V617F mutations in 90% to 95% of patients with PV, and in 50% to 60% of patients with ET and PMF. 1-5 In addition, somatic mutations in the thrombopoietin receptor MPL in a subset of patients with JAK2V617F-negative ET and PMF, JAK2 exon 12 mutations 6,7 in JAK2V617F-negative PV, 8,9 and LNK mutations in JAK2V617F-negative MPN 10-12 have been identified. These genetic data indicate that mutations that lead to constitutive JAK-STAT signaling are a common genetic event in the different MPNs. The identification of mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway in the majority of MPN patients led to the development of JAK inhibitors, and approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). 13,14 Treatment with ruxolitinib and other JAK kinase inhibitors leads to substantive clinical benefit including marked reduction in spl...