Introduction: Synaptic damage, axonal neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation are common features in Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). Methods: Unicentric cohort of 353 participants included healthy control (HC) subjects, AD continuum stages, genetic AD and FTD, and FTD and CJD. We measured cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light (NF-L), neurogranin (Ng), 14-3-3, and YKL-40 proteins.Results: Biomarkers showed differences in HC subjects versus AD, FTD, and CJD. Disease groups differed between them except AD versus FTD for YKL-40. Only NF-L differed between all stages within the AD continuum. AD and FTD symptomatic mutation carriers presented differences with respect to HC subjects. Applying the AT(N) system, 96% subjects were positive for neurodegeneration if 14-3-3 was used, 94% if NF-L was used, 62% if Ng was used, and 53% if YKL-40 was used.

Highlights Posterior cortices, hippocampus and amygdala track atrophy in EOAD over two years. The medial temporal cortex is unaltered in EOAD at early stages. EOAD exhibited a posterior-to-anterior gradient of cortical loss after two years. EOAD subcortical volume loss extends beyond hippocampus and amygdala after two years. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers might predict atrophy rates in EOAD.

The neuropathological hallmark of the C9orf72 intronic hexanucleotide expansion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the presence of small ubiquitin/p62-positive and transactive response DNA binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43)-negative cytoplasmic inclusions in several brain areas. The identification of this histopathological signature is highly predictive of an underlying mutation. In this study, we screened 1800 cases of the Barcelona IDIBAPS Brain Bank, independently of the clinical and final neuropathological diagnosis of the brain donor, for the presence of ubiquitin/p62-positive inclusions in the cerebellum (UPPI). Positive cases were also stained for dipeptide repeats. We identified a total of 21 donors with UPPI and in all of them the C9orf72 hexanucleotide expansion was genetically confirmed. Most donors had an FTLD or to a lesser extent ALS clinico-pathological phenotype. However, 3 cases had been previously classified as having clinically and neuropathologically Lewy body disease. Other co-existing pathologies, especially of the PART-type, were also frequently encountered. This study highlights the importance of the evaluation of ubiquitin/p62-positive cytoplasmic inclusions in all neurodegenerative diseases as a good screening method for the detection of C9orf72 expansion mutation, since this mutation is not rare and can overlap with other neurodegenerative entities.

Prior studies have described distinct patterns of brain gray matter and white matter alterations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), as well as differences in their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers profiles. We aim to investigate the relationship between early-onset AD (EOAD) and FTLD structural alterations and CSF biomarker levels. We included 138 subjects (64 EOAD, 26 FTLD, and 48 controls), all of them with a 3T MRI brain scan and CSF biomarkers available (the 42 amino acid-long form of the amyloid-beta protein [Aβ42], total-tau protein [Ttau], neurofilament light chain [NfL], neurogranin [Ng], and 14-3-3 levels). We used FreeSurfer and FSL to obtain cortical thickness (CTh) and fraction anisotropy (FA) maps. We studied group differences in CTh and FA and described the "AD signature" and "FTLD signature." We tested multiple regression models to find which CSFbiomarkers better explained each disease neuroimaging signature. CTh and FA maps Neus Falgàs, Mariona Ruiz-Peris, Albert Lladó, and Raquel Sánchez-Valle authors contributed equally to this work.

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: Early-and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD) share the same neuropathological traits but show distinct cognitive features. We aimed to explore baseline and longitudinal outcomes of global and domainspecific cognitive function in a well characterized cohort of patients with a biomarker-based diagnosis. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 195 participants were included and classified according to their age, clinical status, and CSF AD biomarker profile: 89 EOAD, 37 LOAD, 46 young healthy controls (age ≤ 65 years), and 23 old healthy controls (>65 years). All subjects underwent clinical and neuropsychological assessment, neuroimaging, APOE genotyping and lumbar puncture. Results: We found distinct neuropsychological profiles between EOAD and LOAD at the time of diagnosis. Both groups showed similar performances on memory and language domains, but the EOAD patients displayed worsened deficits in visual perception, praxis, and executive tasks (p < 0.05). Longitudinally, cognitive decline in EOAD was more pronounced than LOAD in the global outcomes at the expense of these nonamnestic domains. We found that years of education significantly influenced the decline in most of the neuropsychological tests. Besides, the APOE e4 status showed a significant effect on the decline of memory-related tasks within the EOAD cohort (p < 0.05). Interpretation: Age of onset is a main factor shaping the cognitive trajectories in AD patients, with younger age driving to a steeper decline of the non-memory domains. Years of education are related to a transversal decline in all cognitive domains and APOE e4 status to a specific decline in memory performance in EOAD.

No abstract