Cross sections for chemisorption of N2 onto Al44(+/-) cluster ions have been measured as a function of relative kinetic energy and the temperature of the metal cluster. There is a kinetic energy threshold for chemisorption, indicating that it is an activated process. The threshold energies are around 3.5 eV when the clusters are in their solid phase and drop to around 2.5 eV when the clusters melt, indicating that the liquid clusters are much more reactive than the solid. Below the melting temperature the threshold for Al44(-) is smaller than for Al44(+), but for the liquid clusters the anion and cation have similar thresholds. At high cluster temperatures and high collision energies the Al44N2(+/-) chemisorption product dissociates through several channels, including loss of Al, N2, and Al3N. Density functional calculations are employed to understand the thermodynamics and the dynamics of the reaction. The theoretical results suggest that the lowest energy pathway for activation of dinitrogen is not dynamically accessible under the experimental conditions, so that an explicit account of dynamical effects, via molecular dynamics simulations, is necessary in order to interpret the experimental measurements. The calculations reproduce all of the main features of the experimental results, including the kinetic energy thresholds of the anion and cation and the dissociation energies of the liquid Al44N2(+/-) product. The strong increase in reactivity on melting appears to be due to the volume change of melting and to atomic disorder.

The kinetic energy threshold for chemisorption of N(2) on Al(100)(+) has been measured as a function of the nanocluster's temperature from 440 to 790 K. When the Al(100)(+) cluster melts at 620-660 K, the threshold drops by approximately 1 eV (approximately 96 kJ/mol). A decrease in the activation energy of this magnitude causes a 10(8)-fold increase in the reaction rate at the melting temperature. The decrease in the activation energy may result from the mobility of the surface atoms on the liquid cluster, which allows them to move to a lower energy arrangement as the N(2) approaches.

Heat capacities have been measured as a function of temperature for isolated aluminum nanoclusters with 84-128 atoms. Most clusters show a single sharp peak in the heat capacity which is attributed to a melting transition. However, there are several size regimes where additional features are observed; for clusters with 84-89 atoms the peak in the heat capacity is either broad or bimodal. For Al(115) (+), Al(116) (+), and Al(117) (+) there are two well-defined peaks, and for Al(126) (+), Al(127) (+), and Al(128) (+) there is a dip in the heat capacity at lower temperature than the peak. The broad or bimodal peaks for clusters with 84-89 atoms are not significantly changed by annealing to 823 K (above the melting temperature), but the dips for Al(126) (+), Al(127) (+), and Al(128) (+) disappear when these clusters are annealed to 523 K (above the temperature of the dip but below the melting temperature). Both the melting temperatures and the latent heats change fairly smoothly with the cluster size in the size regime examined here. There are steps in the melting temperatures for clusters with around 100 and 117 atoms. The step at Al(100) (+) is correlated with a substantial peak in the latent heats but the step at Al(117) (+) correlates with a minimum. Since the latent heats are correlated with the cluster cohesive energies, the substantial peak in the latent heats at Al(100) (+) indicates this cluster is particularly strongly bound.

Heat capacities measured as a function of temperature for Al(115)(+), Al(116)(+), and Al(117)(+) show two well-resolved peaks, at around 450 and 600 K. After being annealed to 523 K (a temperature between the two peaks) or to 773 K (well above both peaks), the high temperature peak remains unchanged but the low temperature peak disappears. After considering the possible explanations, the low temperature peak is attributed to a structural transition and the high temperature peak to the melting of the higher enthalpy structure generated by the structural transition. The annealing results show that the liquid clusters freeze exclusively into the higher enthalpy structure and that the lower enthalpy structure is not accessible from the higher enthalpy one on the timescale of the experiments. We suggest that the low enthalpy structure observed before annealing results from epitaxy, where the smaller clusters act as a nucleus and follow a growth pattern that provides access to the low enthalpy structure. The solid-to-solid transition that leads to the low temperature peak in the heat capacity does not occur under equilibrium but requires a superheated solid.