No abstract

Reports highlighting the problems with the standard practice of using bar graphs to show continuous data have prompted many journals to adopt new visualization policies. These policies encourage authors to avoid bar graphs and use graphics that show the data distribution; however, they provide little guidance on how to effectively display data. We conducted a systematic review of studies published in top peripheral vascular disease journals to determine what types of figures are used, and to assess the prevalence of suboptimal data visualization practices. Among papers with data figures, 47.7% of papers used bar graphs to present continuous data. This primer provides a detailed overview of strategies for addressing this issue by (1) outlining strategies for selecting the correct type of figure depending on the study design, sample size, and the type of variable; (2) examining techniques for making effective dot plots, box plots, and violin plots; and (3) illustrating how to avoid sending mixed messages by aligning the figure structure with the study design and statistical analysis. We also present solutions to other common problems identified in the systematic review. Resources include a list of free tools and templates that authors can use to create more informative figures and an online simulator that illustrates why summary statistics are meaningful only when there are enough data to summarize. Last, we consider steps that investigators can take to improve figures in the scientific literature.

Background The endothelial glycocalyx is a vasoprotective barrier between the blood and endothelium. We hypothesized that glycocalyx degradation is present in preeclampsia, a pregnancy‐specific hypertensive disorder characterized by endothelial dysfunction and activation. Methods and Results We examined the sublingual glycocalyx noninvasively using sidestream dark field imaging in the third trimester among women with normotensive pregnancies (n=73), early (n=14) or late (n=29) onset preeclampsia, or gestational diabetes mellitus (n=21). We calculated the width of the glycocalyx that was permeable to red blood cells (called the perfused boundary region , a measure of glycocalyx degradation) and the percentage of vessels that were filled with red blood cells ≥50% of the time (a measure of microvascular perfusion). In addition, we measured circulating levels of glycocalyx components, including heparan sulfate proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, and SDC1 (syndecan 1), in a subset of participants by ELISA . Repeated‐measures ANOVA was performed to adjust for vessel diameter and caffeine intake. Women with early onset preeclampsia showed higher glycocalyx degradation, indicated by a larger perfused boundary region (mean: 2.14 [95% CI, 2.05–2.20]), than the remaining groups (mean: normotensive: 1.99 [95% CI, 1.95–2.02], P =0.002; late‐onset preeclampsia: 2.01 [95% CI, 1.96–2.07], P =0.024; gestational diabetes mellitus: 1.97 [95% CI, 1.91–2.04], P =0.004). The percentage of vessels that were filled with red blood cells was significantly lower in early onset preeclampsia. These structural glycocalyx changes were accompanied by elevated plasma concentrations of the glycocalyx components, heparan sulfate proteoglycans and hyaluronic acid, in early onset preeclampsia compared with normotensive pregnancy. Conclusions Glycocalyx degradation and reduced microvascular perfusion are associated with endothelial dysfunction and activation and vascular injury in early onset preeclampsia.

Transparent reporting is essential for the critical evaluation of studies. However, the reporting of statistical methods for studies in the biomedical sciences is often limited. This systematic review examines the quality of reporting for two statistical tests, t-tests and ANOVA, for papers published in a selection of physiology journals in June 2017. Of the 328 original research articles examined, 277 (84.5%) included an ANOVA or t-test or both. However, papers in our sample were routinely missing essential information about both types of tests: 213 papers (95% of the papers that used ANOVA) did not contain the information needed to determine what type of ANOVA was performed, and 26.7% of papers did not specify what post-hoc test was performed. Most papers also omitted the information needed to verify ANOVA results. Essential information about t-tests was also missing in many papers. We conclude by discussing measures that could be taken to improve the quality of reporting.

No abstract

The relationship between the age of onset of type 1 diabetes and the subsequent development of a severe eating disorder by female patients. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12(4 Pt 2):396-401.

Frequency and findings of the acquired anorectal disease in the pediatric population with chronic constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) are used for closure of fistulas, leaks, and acute perforations, and for GI bleeding. Adverse events include perforation, migration, and ulceration. Little is know about the natural history of OTSCs and no data addressing the longevity of clips is available. We present an interim analysis of our center’s experience with OTSC focusing on natural history. METHODS: OTSCs used from 1/1/2011 to 1/1/2019 were compiled and retrospective chart review undertaken. Primary endpoint was clip retention time (time when the clip was placed to time the clip was last seen or was physically removed). Secondary endpoints were rate of complications and factors that influence clip retention time and clinical success. Cox proportional hazards were used to evaluate variables impacting clip retention. Univariate regression was used to assess potential risk factors for adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 358 OTSC were placed in 299 patients (55.8% male, n = 184) with mean age 64 + 15.3 years. Procedures and indications presented in Table 1. Clip placement was clinically successful in 81% of cases (N = 265). Median time to clip loss as assessed by Kaplan-Meier curve was 267 days (95% CI 196-406) (Figure 1). Adverse events occurred in 34 clip placements (10.7%) and included bleeding (n = 8, 24.2%), perforation (n = 5, 15.2%), ulceration (n = 3, 9.1%), migration (n = 15, 45.5%), and infection (n = 1, 3.0%). Univariate analysis (Table 2) revealed that age, gender, type of clip used (there are 3 types of OTSC), and performing endoscopist did not impact clip retention rate. A size 14 clip had marginally higher rates of retention compared to others. Clips placed in the rectum or esophagus were lost earlier compared to those in the small/large intestine and stomach. Clips placed for fistulas and those associated with adverse event were associated with earlier clip loss. In evaluation of clinical success, clips placed for fistulas had a relative risk of clinical failure of 2.08 (95% CI 1.29-3.36) compared to all other indications. CONCLUSION: OTSCs are retained for a median of 8.9 months with clip location and indication for placement being key factors in time to clip loss. Clips used for fistula closure were more likely to be lost compared to those placed for other indications, less likely to be clinically successful, and more likely to cause a complication. These data help guide decision-making when considering OTSC use across clinical indications.