Summary Various immunization assays were used to demonstrate the lack of immunogenicity of three BALB/c tumours of spontaneous origin and of a fourth one resulting from foreign body tumorigenesis. All four tumours inhibited the growth of a second implant of the same tumour into the contralateral flank. In our tumour models "concomitant immunity" (1) was not mediated by macrophage or T-cell dependent immune reactions: both thymectomized BALB/c and nude mice (treated or untreated with silica) gave the same results as intact mice; (2) showed some degree of non-specificity, inhibiting the growth of a different tumour in 3/4 cases; though, the existence of a specific component could not be discarded; (3) was proportional to the volume of the primary tumour at the time of the second challenge; (4) was dependent on actively growing primary tumour, not being obtained with progressively increasing daily inocula of irradiated tumour cells; (5) was detectable in an actively growing secondary tumour: recurrent growth after partial surgical excision was inhibited and (6) involved cytostasis of the secondary tumour: a syngeneic graft of the overlying skin led to tumour growth while histological studies revealed the presence of viable tumour cells. It is postulated that "concomitant immunity" or resistance can be generated without the active participation of the immune system and that tumour-related factors are, in certain cases, responsible for blocking the growth of secondary tumours.

Concomitant tumor resistance (CR) is a phenomenon originally described in 1906 in which a tumor-bearing host is resistant to the growth of secondary tumor implants and metastasis. Although recent studies have indicated that T-cell-dependent processes mediate CR in hosts bearing immunogenic small tumors, manifestations of CR induced by immunogenic and nonimmunogenic large tumors have been associated with an elusive serum factor. In this study, we identify this serum factor as tyrosine in its meta and ortho isoforms. In three different murine models of cancer that generate CR, both meta-tyrosine and ortho-tyrosine inhibited tumor growth. In addition, we showed that both isoforms of tyrosine blocked metastasis in a fourth model that does not generate CR but is sensitive to CR induced by other tumors. Mechanistic studies showed that the antitumor effects of the tyrosine isoforms were mediated, in part, by early inhibition of mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway and inactivation of STAT3, potentially driving tumor cells into a state of dormancy. By revealing a molecular basis for the classical phenomenon of CR, our findings may stimulate new generalized approaches to limit the development of metastases that arise after resection of primary tumors, an issue of pivotal importance to oncologists and their patients. Cancer Res; 71(22); 7113-24. Ó2011 AACR.

Concomitant tumor resistance (CR) is a phenomenon in which a tumor-bearing host is resistant to the growth of secondary tumor implants and metastasis. Although previous studies indicated that T-cell-dependent processes mediate CR in hosts bearing immunogenic small tumors, manifestations of CR induced by immunogenic and nonimmunogenic large tumors have been associated with an elusive serum factor. In a recently published study, we identified this factor as meta-tyrosine and ortho-tyrosine, 2 isomers of tyrosine that would not be present in normal proteins. In 3 different murine models of cancer that generate CR, both meta-and orthotyrosine inhibited tumor growth. Additionally, we showed that both isoforms of tyrosine blocked metastasis in a fourth model that does not generate CR but is sensitive to CR induced by other tumors. Mechanistic studies showed that the antitumor effects of the tyrosine isomers were mediated in part by early inhibition of the MAP/ ERK pathway and inactivation of STAT3, potentially driving tumor cells into a state of dormancy in G 0 -phase. Other mechanisms, putatively involving the activation of an intra-S-phase checkpoint, would also inhibit tumor proliferation by accumulating cells in S-phase. By revealing a molecular basis for the classical phenomenon of CR, our findings may stimulate new generalized approaches to limit the development of metastases that arise after resection of primary tumors or after other stressors that may promote the escape of metastases from dormancy, an issue that is of pivotal importance to oncologists and their patients. Cancer Res; 72(5);

Summary Resistance of tumour-bearing mice to a second tumour challenge, that is concomitant resistance, was evaluated in euthymic and nude mice using nine tumours with widely different degrees of immunogenicity. Two temporally separate peaks of concomitant resistance were detected during tumour development. The first one was exhibited only by small immunogenic tumours; it was tumour specific and mediated by classical immunological T-cell-dependent mechanisms. The second peak was shared by both immunogenic and nonimmunogenic large tumours; it was non-specific, thymus independent and correlated with the activity of a serum factor (neither antibody nor complement) that inhibited the in vitro proliferation of tumour cells. This factor was eluted from a Sephadex G-15 column at fractions corresponding to a molecular weight of approximately 1000 Da and it was recovered from a high-performance liquid chromatography column in one peak presenting maximum absorption at 215 and 266 nm. The data presented in this paper suggest for the first time, to our knowledge, that in spite of the differences between immunogenic and non-immunogenic tumours, a common serum-mediated mechanism seems to underlie the concomitant resistance induced by both types of tumours at late stages of tumour development.

Although animals can be immunized against the growth of some tumor implants, most of the attempts to use immunotherapy to cause the regression of animal and human tumors once they have become established have been disappointing even when strongly immunogenic tumors were used as target. In this paper, we demonstrate that the failure to achieve an efficient immunological treatment against an established strongly immunogenic murine fibrosarcoma was paralleled with the emergence of a state of immunological unresponsiveness (immunological eclipse) against tumor antigens observed when the tumor surpassed the critical size of 500 mm(3). In turn, the onset of the immunological eclipse was coincidental with the onset of a systemic inflammatory condition characterized by a high number of circulating and splenic polymorphonucleated neutrophils (PMN) displaying activation and Gr1(+)Mac1(+) phenotype and an increasing serum concentration of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-6 cytokines and C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum A amyloid (SAA) phase acute proteins. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with a single low dose (0.75 mg/kg) of the synthetic corticoid dexamethasone (DX) significantly reduced all the systemic inflammatory parameters and simultaneously reversed the immunological eclipse, as evidenced by the restoration of specific T-cell-dependent concomitant immunity, ability of spleen cells to transfer anti-tumor activity and recovery of T-cell signal transduction molecules. Two other anti-inflammatory treatments by using indomethacin or dimeric TNF-alpha receptor, also partially reversed the immunological eclipse although the effect was not as striking as that observed with DX. The reversion of the immunological eclipse was not enough on its own to inhibit the primary growing tumor. However, when we used the two-step strategy of inoculating DX to reverse the eclipse and then dendritic cells loaded with tumor antigens (DC) as an immunization booster, a significant inhibition of the growth of both established tumors and remnant tumor cells after excision of large established tumors was observed, despite the fact that the vaccination alone (DC) had no effect or even enhanced tumor growth in certain circumstances. The two-step strategy of tumor immunotherapy that we present is based on the rationale that it is necessary to eliminate or ameliorate the immunological eclipse as a precondition to allow an otherwise ineffective anti-tumor immunological therapy to have a chance to be successful.

The non-metastatic murine mammary adenocarcinoma M3 and its metastatic variant MM3 were used to evaluate the role of intratumoral necrosis in cell detachment and metastasis. Accelular extracts from necrotic areas of both tumors increased in vitro cellular detachment from M3 but not from MM3 fragments. Furthermore, the in vivo inoculation of the necrotic extracts within non-metastatic M3 tumors gave rise to pulmonary metastases. Histological studies revealed in M3 a central necrosis limited by an uninterrupted peripheral ring of well preserved cells, while in MM3 necrotic and non-necrotic areas alternated. It is concluded that the distribution of necrosis within the primary tumor by facilitating cell detachment is, at least in part, responsible for the development of metastases.

An attempt was made to explain the distinct lung metastatic patterns of 2 mammary adenocarcinomas with a common BALB/c origin: M3, which does not induce spontaneous metastases, and MM3 with an almost 100% incidence. No difference between the 2 tumors was detected with respect to host mononuclear cell content, degree of immunogenicity or lung-colony-forming ability. Conversely, there was a marked difference in the capacity to induce concomitant resistance: M3-bearing mice induced stronger and earlier resistance against i.v. challenge of both M3 and MM3 tumor cells than MM3-bearing mice; this resistance was expressed as lower number of lung metastases and lower tumor-cell proliferation in metastatic nodules. M3 was also able to control the development of spontaneous metastases: metastases developed in all M3-excised mice, compared with none in M3-bearing mice, while MM3-bearing mice also bearing a secondary M3 tumor developed fewer metastases than mice bearing MM3 only. This anti-metastatic effect does not appear to depend on classical immunological mechanisms since no difference could be detected between the 2 tumors in response to T cells, NK, macrophages or antibodies.

Background: Most theories about cancer proposed during the last century share a common denominator: cancer is believed to be a biological nonsense for the organism in which it originates, since cancer cells are believed to be ones evading the rules that control normal cell proliferation and differentiation. In this essay, we have challenged this interpretation on the basis that, throughout the animal kingdom, cancer seems to arise only in injured organs and tissues that display lost or diminished regenerative ability.